From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9E412CA5FA5 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:59:23 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=gC9+4iTynloA2cHF6NCfusb6R3+csWJwJp2/KYeHI68=; b=dhbgDG7BYqU8xoSOUtpA/QlK0c Yia5jmti2n0EeTUFsANDuBFymXDnNcXxusgD079NtH6S6OZ48nBTWtQD+zhdr9gMwBGwrPYQyqfo8 DiBDDLwKpeXT0j6xGJnjATijSSlUrldEGLKwN8tFI0nTLzWLt3JZCGM31QRjSMgQl9CSGOkf7+tzd B0uusGzXNnQ7SbO03pSM/A63CFj3jBYzgw49KdaCOml+/5zNA1DquA3jNUH7s9+DgsPlkY0WlGDcO oH4IMrMmygDCwnE1wkRYF/tUBKuY0YQWfvFtvLHMdkm1L9WMm6018ouVdwgqZVOR2b+jPFgdYegx6 1PN7cfQA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBfr1-00000004erO-0u1D; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:59:15 +0000 Received: from smtp5-g21.free.fr ([212.27.42.5]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xBfqy-00000004eq3-0Jjk for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 21:59:14 +0000 Received: from L30177.local (unknown [IPv6:2a01:e0a:ac2:22b0:fd38:7b91:be5e:6aee]) (Authenticated sender: vjardin@free.fr) by smtp5-g21.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7B1C95FFAA; Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:58:51 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=free.fr; s=smtp-20201208; t=1790719143; bh=cr5V+n/greApI8Zyhw+2u0aNrf/2IvsBktudjqmiqro=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=BNoPtG9afk89bIDpSSwZpYx+lHCVs9Wsyv/laS8KKM0eqRGAjxlZleqPa51jjBBU5 CY7Q33HOgnqUtHj8opAsuXscshB9tSe+jXDsh+/IBv/vcGHmMqdN1bYjb4DteSNDPn B9GDCmqWXGEAaFsiqKB6SN90MGeJKcqebtZORXaAGOryOrUupiWaLlc0JY3LkixbwL ok5AJ2D+qJ/7MYK3yUMeKDeiAFz73Xpqj78QcL1TN6WCvq87mwuHEBaKYE3apNoPkK E2prVdLk25A63Wb5VrAMU4px5KRDXSwyLkmnnsoNC+U20BeWfKKrlKF+G5RXl9sj2P VzGB14XiP14Tg== Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2026 23:58:49 +0200 From: Vincent Jardin To: Andi Shyti Cc: Oleksij Rempel , Pengutronix Kernel Team , Frank Li , Sascha Hauer , Fabio Estevam , Carlos Song , Haobin Jiang , linux-i2c@vger.kernel.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] i2c: imx: add I2C_M_REV_DIR_ADDR and I2C_M_NOSTART Message-ID: References: <20260812-for-upstream-i2c-imx-lx2160-reverse-v2-1-f1343714c5a9@free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20260929_145912_272794_CE524628 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 6.36 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hi Andi, Sorry to ask again: could you consider this patch for i2c/i2c-next, so it can land into v7.4 which is coming soon ? It carries Carlos Song's Acked-by and Frank Li's Reviewed-by. It still applies cleanly on your current i2c/i2c-next. https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/project/linux-i2c/patch/20260812-for-upstream-i2c-imx-lx2160-reverse-v2-1-f1343714c5a9@free.fr/ which I checked few minutes ago. Haobin Jiang's "i2c: imx: honour I2C_M_IGNORE_NAK" v3 is based on it, and waiting for it: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-i2c/tencent_342A87BFCECA70C9982E68A79AAD878B6909@qq.com/ If you prefer a v3 rebased on i2c/i2c-next with both tags, I can send it too. Best regards, Vincent