From: Kohei Enju <enju.kohei@fujitsu.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Suzuki K Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com>,
Sami Mujawar <sami.mujawar@arm.com>,
Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>,
"Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)" <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: rsi: Correct type of realm_config::hash_algo
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:16:19 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as7jnnH0hAvYa0UM@FCCLS0092175.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <as5ljILkGNxH0TTd@arm.com>
On 10/13 18:08, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 29, 2026 at 08:36:00PM +0900, Kohei Enju wrote:
> > The RMM specification defines RsiHashAlgorithm as an 8-bit type, but
> > realm_config::hash_algo is currently declared as unsigned long.
> >
> > There are currently no upstream users of this field, so the mismatch
> > does not cause an observable issue today. However, a proposed series
> > adding support for Realm measurement registers uses this field and
> > exposes a bug caused by the incorrect type.
> >
> > Change hash_algo to u8 to match the RMM specification while preserving
> > the size and layout of struct realm_config.
>
> Doesn't the RMM spec say that the unused bits must be zero? B5.5.19.
You're right. The RMM must zero the unused bits, but TF-RMM does not
appear to do so. I agree that this should be fixed in TF-RMM as well.
> That said, I'm ok with the explicit u8 here.
Thanks.
>
> > Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260413084957.327661-4-sami.mujawar@arm.com/
> > Signed-off-by: Kohei Enju <enju.kohei@fujitsu.com>
> > ---
> > include/linux/arm-smccc-rsi.h | 5 ++++-
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/include/linux/arm-smccc-rsi.h b/include/linux/arm-smccc-rsi.h
> > index fddb77986f70..2fb6ec5e0298 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/arm-smccc-rsi.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/arm-smccc-rsi.h
> > @@ -128,7 +128,10 @@ struct realm_config {
> > union {
> > struct {
> > unsigned long ipa_bits; /* Width of IPA in bits */
> > - unsigned long hash_algo; /* Hash algorithm */
> > + union {
> > + u8 hash_algo; /* Hash algorithm */
> > + u8 pad_hash_algo[8];
> > + };
>
> I would skip the padding for now, we have one already. If we later add
> the next fields, I have a slight preference for a u8 reserved[7] field
> than another union.
Ack. I'll drop the inner union in v2.
Thanks,
Kohei
>
> > };
> > u8 pad[0x200];
> > };
>
> --
> Catalin
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 2:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-09-29 11:36 [PATCH] arm64: rsi: Correct type of realm_config::hash_algo Kohei Enju
2026-10-13 17:08 ` Catalin Marinas
2026-10-14 2:16 ` Kohei Enju [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as7jnnH0hAvYa0UM@FCCLS0092175.localdomain \
--to=enju.kohei@fujitsu.com \
--cc=Suzuki.Poulose@arm.com \
--cc=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=sami.mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox