From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, dcaratti@redhat.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
daniel@riscstar.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: fix mqprio and cbs combination
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2026 11:04:39 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <as9Fp6tT8-R26zsW@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179192615470.434549.15391678719442132292@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 5354 bytes --]
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential
> issue(s) to consider.
>
> Critical: 0 · High: 1 · Medium: 0 · Low: 0
>
> If you believe none of the issues are legitimate, please reply to each
> issue of Medium severity or higher and explain why the AI is wrong.
> If any of them are legitimate and you plan to respin, please let patchwork
> know by including "pw-bot: cr" as a separate line at the end of your reply
> (one such reply per series is enough).
>
> - [High] The commit message says the strict-priority scheduler selected
> by the channel-mode mqprio offload and the per-queue CBS shaper "are…
>
> --
>
> net: stmmac: fix mqprio and cbs combination
>
> This patch removes the checks that stopped the channel-mode mqprio offload
> and the CBS offload from being enabled together. It drops the AVB queue
> rejection in tc_mqprio_validate_chan_mode(), the prio_offload check in
> tc_setup_cbs(), and the matching AVB check in stmmac_reinit_queues().
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c
> > index ea1f97d6f0bd5..175236ba379d0 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_tc.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -1350,18 +1346,6 @@ static int tc_mqprio_validate_chan_mode(struct stmmac_priv *priv,
> > return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > }
> >
> > - /* Forcing strict priority conflicts with the CBS algorithm
> > - * of AVB queues, so reject the offload when any queue is
> > - * configured as AVB.
> > - */
> > - for (i = 0; i < pdata->tx_queues_to_use; i++) {
> > - if (pdata->tx_queues_cfg[i].mode_to_use == MTL_QUEUE_AVB) {
> > - NL_SET_ERR_MSG_MOD(mqprio->extack,
> > - "SP conflicts with AVB queues");
> > - return -EOPNOTSUPP;
> > - }
> > - }
> > -
>
> [Severity: High]
>
> The commit message says:
>
> The strict-priority scheduler selected by the channel-mode mqprio
> offload and the per-queue CBS shaper are independent MTL settings and do
> not conflict
>
> Is that true on XGMAC/XLGMAC cores? They use dwmac510_tc_ops, so both
> tc_setup_dwmac510_mqprio() and tc_setup_cbs() can be reached on them.
>
> On XGMAC, SP and CBS look like two values of the same per-TC TSA field.
> dwxgmac2_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms() rewrites that field on every TC:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c:dwxgmac2_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms() {
> ...
> for (i = 0; i < MTL_MAX_TX_QUEUES; i++) {
> value = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_MTL_TCx_ETS_CONTROL(i));
> value &= ~XGMAC_TSA;
> if (ets)
> value |= XGMAC_ETS;
> writel(value, ioaddr + XGMAC_MTL_TCx_ETS_CONTROL(i));
> }
> }
>
> dwxgmac2_config_cbs() turns CBS on by writing the same field:
>
> drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/dwxgmac2_core.c:dwxgmac2_config_cbs() {
> ...
> value = readl(ioaddr + XGMAC_MTL_TCx_ETS_CONTROL(queue));
> value &= ~XGMAC_TSA;
> value |= XGMAC_CC | XGMAC_CBS;
> writel(value, ioaddr + XGMAC_MTL_TCx_ETS_CONTROL(queue));
> }
>
> With this check gone, what happens if a TX queue is already in AVB mode?
> One way to get there is a DT mtl-tx-config queue with snps,avb-algorithm.
> In that case stmmac_open()->stmmac_mtl_configuration() programs CBS for the
> queue when the device is opened.
I guess the only case that is not covered yet is if the user configures CBS
via the device-tree and then applies mqprio via tc on top of it.
I will fix in v2.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> After that, "tc qdisc replace ... mqprio ... mode channel hw 1" now
> succeeds and runs:
>
> tc_setup_dwmac510_mqprio()
> tc_mqprio_validate_chan_mode()
> tc_mqprio_config_queue_prio()
> stmmac_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms(priv, priv->hw, MTL_TX_ALGORITHM_SP)
> dwxgmac2_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms()
>
> Would this also clear TSA on the AVB queue and turn CBS off in hardware?
> Nothing calls stmmac_configure_cbs() again afterwards. Meanwhile
> tx_queues_cfg[].mode_to_use still says MTL_QUEUE_AVB, so the driver state
> and the hardware would disagree until the next ndo_open.
>
> Removing mqprio seems to cause the same problem. prio_offload can now be
> true while AVB queues exist, and stmmac_reset_tc_mqprio() then does:
>
> stmmac_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms(priv, priv->hw,
> priv->plat->tx_sched_algorithm);
>
> On XGMAC this rewrites TSA on every TC again (to ETS or SP). That would
> wipe CBS on any AVB queue and not restore it.
>
> The example in the commit message (mqprio first, then the cbs children)
> works because config_cbs runs after the SP write.
>
> On dwmac4/EQoS the claim does seem to hold.
> dwmac4_prog_mtl_tx_algorithms() only touches MTL_OPERATION_SCHALG_MASK, and
> CBS is enabled separately through MTL_ETS_CTRL_AVALG.
>
> The commit in the Fixes: tag added these checks on purpose:
>
> Forcing strict priority conflicts with the CBS algorithm of AVB queues
>
> Should the checks be kept for XGMAC? Or could the mqprio set and reset
> paths call stmmac_configure_cbs() again after reprogramming the TX
> algorithm?
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261012-stmmac-mqprio-cbs-combo-v1-1-831e323eb4ef%40oss.qualcomm.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-14 9:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-12 21:14 [PATCH net-next] net: stmmac: fix mqprio and cbs combination Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-13 9:51 ` Daniel Thompson
2026-10-13 9:58 ` Maxime Chevallier
2026-10-13 10:10 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-13 10:21 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-13 10:43 ` Daniel Machon
2026-10-13 12:24 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-13 21:15 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-14 9:04 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=as9Fp6tT8-R26zsW@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=daniel@riscstar.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dcaratti@redhat.com \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox