From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CE4E60A2626 for ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:22:48 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key, unprotected) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=bombadil.20210309 header.b=GRlYOpNe DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=SgnsI9xvRVm2E2Nsl7k7rIHbcV39kvLE5MaE6MErPqI=; b=GRlYOpNeJ4TsYkd1K5JyxTH/yK iz2VAMWpiKGmirNVxnYKdo0gDmfxvFKGvCOZzD5/MNFaRRTyLjzY9vrAaKCbyW4Xk0uX5rUmKwCCR 3W/oKwGOFdhaPBBCMlACaZVEtzbYXHRrG6aeYnwVtPdQ2D+GXIT4hja25TbT0JECsy9xlz5H6FVdb IPRqDo5Z5RP3x3ieIv7fogD3Eb60yWFiATVQHS++EkkAj0VC5rjbtNzA8p6xElg6Mqr1ULiadUIpW wUWjljSC5rAws/j7dwdMdAwrvTvcEodJZv2fd0pAbcUlzOXTPQH9ghbgkJwKv7JUIXwLU4ZMJXXK7 MfkRGpCA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xJXDF-0000000C59j-26mZ; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:22:41 +0000 Received: from elvis.franken.de ([193.175.24.41]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.99.1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1xJXDC-0000000C56s-0j4T for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 14:22:40 +0000 Received: from uucp by elvis.franken.de with local-rmail (Exim 3.36 #1) id 1xJXD0-0008O8-00; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 16:22:26 +0200 Received: by alpha.franken.de (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A39ACC0423; Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:44:18 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2026 15:44:18 +0200 From: Thomas Bogendoerfer To: Andy Shevchenko Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Linus Walleij , Bradford Love , linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , Daniel Mack , Haojian Zhuang , Robert Jarzmik , Russell King , Hauke Mehrtens , =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] gpiolib: kill gpio_request_one() Message-ID: References: <20260715185112.1323510-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> X-Archived-By: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.9.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20261021_072238_513822_76CB9C5F X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 22.49 ) X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_EF,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=4.0.1 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.1 (2024-03-26) on aws-us-west-2-korg-listserv-alma10-1 On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 04:55:16PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Tue, Oct 13, 2026 at 09:35:43AM -0400, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Oct 2026 15:09:14 +0200, Andy Shevchenko > > said: > > > On Fri, Jul 24, 2026 at 11:40:59PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote: > > >> On Wed, Jul 15, 2026 at 8:51 PM Andy Shevchenko > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >> > This is the finilazation of the work announced in the commit 61e1fd2abca4 > > >> > ("gpiolib: legacy: Make sure we kill gpio_request_one() first"). With this > > >> > small series we kill gpio_request_one() and leave only two legacy calls > > >> > devm_gpio_request_one() and gpio_request(), where the managed one has only > > >> > a few users and high chances to be killed soon as well. > > >> > > > >> > The series is supposed to go via GPIO tree (due to nature of the last patch) > > >> > with possible immutable branch for others. Please, ack. > > >> > > >> The kernel is clearly a better place after these patches than before it, so: > > >> Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij > > > > > > Thanks! > > > Bart, anything needs to be done for this series to go in? > > > > We don't have Acks from MIPS maintainers. :( > > Hmm... Usually Thomas is quick. Thomas, can you give your Ack if you agree with > the changes, please? sorry, I was on vacation. I'm fine with the changes, but I'm not, if they still apply cleanly... Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessarily a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]