From: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com>
To: netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org
Cc: maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com, andrew+netdev@lunn.ch,
davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@kernel.org, kuba@kernel.org,
pabeni@redhat.com, mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com,
alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com, ast@kernel.org,
daniel@iogearbox.net, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com,
sdf@fomichev.me, Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com,
boon.leong.ong@intel.com, o.rempel@pengutronix.de,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 3/6] net: stmmac: drop multi-buffer frames in XDP mode
Date: Tue, 27 Oct 2026 11:23:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <auB7sd5hmULjDdHW@lore-desk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <179309225404.3134.13890305235467768199@kernel.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7407 bytes --]
On Oct 27, netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found more severe
> issue(s) in other patches of this series. This mail is only an FYI, in case
> you want to address the nit picks below when you respin.
>
> Low priority / nit picks for your consideration:
>
> - [Low] The patch cites only `Fixes: 5fabb01207a2` ("net: stmmac: Add
> initial XDP support").
>
> Pre-existing issues:
> - [High] Without an XDP program, stmmac_rx() still re-parses the rest of
> a frame as a new frame when napi_build_skb() fails on a non-last…
> - [Medium] stmmac_rx() adds its per-poll local counters to the device-
> wide `priv->xstats.rx_dropped` and `priv->xstats.rx_errors` (plain…
>
> --
>
> net: stmmac: drop multi-buffer frames in XDP mode
>
> This patch makes stmmac_rx() drop frames that span more than one
> descriptor, or that use the second buffer of a descriptor, while an XDP
> program is attached. Discarded buffers are no longer returned to the page
> pool, so stmmac_rx_refill() can reuse them in place. The re-parse of the
> remaining descriptors after an XDP_CONSUMED verdict is also removed.
>
> > Fixes: 5fabb01207a2 ("net: stmmac: Add initial XDP support")
>
> [Severity: Low]
> Should this also carry a Fixes tag for 88095728511e ("net: stmmac: fix rx
> Scatter-Gather support")? Two of the failures described in the commit
> message seem to come from that commit, not from the initial XDP support.
>
> First, the buf1_len underflow. Before 88095728511e, stmmac_rx_buf1_len()
> returned min_t(unsigned int, dma_buf_sz, plen) for the last descriptor. A
> tail re-parsed after XDP_CONSUMED therefore got dma_buf_sz bytes.
>
> 88095728511e changed the return to:
>
> return min_t(unsigned int, priv->dma_conf.dma_buf_sz, plen - len);
>
> It also moved the XDP-mode FCS strip into the if (!skb) block:
>
> if (stmmac_xdp_is_enabled(priv) && !buf2_len) {
> buf1_len -= ETH_FCS_LEN;
>
> Together, these two changes let a 0-3 byte buf1_len underflow.
>
> Second, the second-buffer case. Before 88095728511e, stmmac_rx_buf2_len()
> started with:
>
> if (!priv->sph_active)
> return 0;
>
> stmmac_xdp_set_prog() clears sph_active while XDP is enabled, so buf2_len
> was always 0 in XDP mode. That check is now:
>
> if (!stmmac_rx_check_buf2_cap(priv))
> return 0;
>
> So "GMAC4/XGMAC always provide a second data buffer per descriptor" has
> only been true since 88095728511e. The new buf2_len drop fixes a condition
> that commit introduced.
>
> The last patch in this series ("net: stmmac: fix XDP RX buffer DMA sync
> length") already carries Fixes: 88095728511e.
ack, I will fix the commit message in v2
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > index 3fa2c15222d88..30a2774d722b7 100644
> > --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/stmicro/stmmac/stmmac_main.c
> > @@ -5903,18 +5903,23 @@ static int stmmac_rx(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int limit, u32 queue)
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > - if (unlikely(error && (status & rx_not_ls)))
> > - goto read_again;
> > + /* We do not support SG in XDP mode */
> > + if (unlikely(!error && (status & rx_not_ls) &&
> > + stmmac_xdp_is_enabled(priv))) {
> > + rx_dropped++;
> > + error = 1;
> > + }
> >
> > if (unlikely(error)) {
> > + if (status & rx_not_ls)
> > + goto read_again;
> > +
> > dev_kfree_skb(skb);
> > goto next;
> > }
>
> [Severity: High]
> This is a pre-existing issue, and this patch did not introduce it. The new
> error-and-drain handling only runs when stmmac_xdp_is_enabled() is true.
> Without an XDP program, can the same re-parse still happen when
> napi_build_skb() fails on a non-last descriptor?
This issue has not been introduced in this patch and it needs to be fixed with
a dedicated patch.
>
> The failure branch in stmmac_rx() leaves skb == NULL and error == 0:
>
> skb = napi_build_skb(page_address(buf->page),
> rx_q->napi_skb_frag_size);
> if (!skb) {
> page_pool_recycle_direct(rx_q->page_pool,
> buf->page);
> buf->page = NULL;
> rx_dropped++;
> count++;
> goto drain_data;
> }
> ...
> drain_data:
> if (likely(status & rx_not_ls))
> goto read_again;
>
> The next descriptor of the same hardware frame then passes the error check
> and is handled as the start of a new frame.
>
> SPH is active by default on SPH-capable GMAC4/XGMAC when no XDP program is
> attached. In that case stmmac_rx_buf1_len() returns 0 for this descriptor:
>
> if (priv->sph_active && len)
> return 0;
>
> napi_build_skb() then builds an skb with an empty linear area, and the
> payload is only in a buf2 frag. pskb_trim(skb, len) does nothing, because
> the stale len is larger than skb->len.
>
> With the default hw_vlan_en, nothing pulls the header into the linear area
> before this call chain:
>
> eth_type_trans()
> eth_skb_pull_mac()
> skb_pull_inline(skb, ETH_HLEN)
> __skb_pull()
> BUG()
>
> Under memory pressure, could an on-link peer panic the machine this way by
> sending a frame larger than one buffer? GMAC_CONFIG_JE is set in
> GMAC_CORE_INIT, so such frames are accepted even at MTU 1500.
>
> Without SPH, the stack instead gets a frame whose Ethernet header comes
> from the middle of the peer's payload.
>
> This path is still unchanged at the end of the series. The VLAN rework in
> "net: stmmac: fix VLAN tag stripping on short and non-linear RX frames"
> adds pskb_may_pull() only to the software stmmac_rx_vlan() path.
>
> Would it drain the frame correctly to set error = 1 in the
> napi_build_skb() failure branch, as this patch does for XDP mode?
>
> > @@ -5926,6 +5931,14 @@ static int stmmac_rx(struct stmmac_priv *priv, int limit, u32 queue)
> > buf2_len = stmmac_rx_buf2_len(priv, p, status, len);
> > len += buf2_len;
> >
> > + /* Drop the packet if it is split over buf1 and buf2 on a
> > + * single descriptor if the interface is running in XDP mode.
> > + */
> > + if (unlikely(stmmac_xdp_is_enabled(priv) && buf2_len)) {
> > + rx_dropped++;
> > + goto next;
> > + }
>
> [Severity: Medium]
> This isn't a bug introduced by this patch. The new drop paths add to
> rx_dropped, which stmmac_rx() folds into a device-wide counter at the end:
>
> priv->xstats.rx_dropped += rx_dropped;
> priv->xstats.rx_errors += rx_errors;
This issue has not been introduced in this patch and it needs to be fixed with
a dedicated patch.
Regards,
Lorenzo
>
> These are plain unsigned long fields in struct stmmac_extra_stats. They
> are updated with a non-atomic read-modify-write, and no shared lock is
> held.
>
> Each RX queue has its own NAPI instance. Can two queues polled on
> different CPUs lose each other's increments here? The napi_syncp section
> just before this only protects the per-queue rxq_stats.
>
> The race goes back to 133466c3bbe171 ("net: stmmac: use per-queue 64 bit
> statistics where necessary").
>
> [ ... ]
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://netdev-ai.bots.linux.dev/sashiko/#/patchset/20261023-stmmac-xdp-fixes-v1-0-efb37e19f5bd%40oss.qualcomm.com
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 228 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-27 10:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-23 8:09 [PATCH net 0/6] net: stmmac: XDP path fixes Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-23 8:09 ` [PATCH net 1/6] net: stmmac: take ownership of saved RX state at poll entry Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-27 9:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 9:58 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-23 8:09 ` [PATCH net 2/6] net: stmmac: drop split frames on AF_XDP zero-copy RX Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-27 9:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 10:17 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-23 8:09 ` [PATCH net 3/6] net: stmmac: drop multi-buffer frames in XDP mode Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-27 9:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 10:23 ` Lorenzo Bianconi [this message]
2026-10-23 8:09 ` [PATCH net 4/6] net: stmmac: copy XDP metadata in AF_XDP zero-copy RX Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-27 9:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 10:48 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-23 8:09 ` [PATCH net 5/6] net: stmmac: fix VLAN tag stripping on short and non-linear RX frames Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-27 9:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 11:10 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-23 8:09 ` [PATCH net 6/6] net: stmmac: fix XDP RX buffer DMA sync length Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-27 9:10 ` netdev-bot+sashiko
2026-10-27 11:39 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-10-23 8:12 ` [PATCH net 0/6] net: stmmac: XDP path fixes netdev-bot+sinfo
2026-10-23 8:34 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=auB7sd5hmULjDdHW@lore-desk \
--to=lorenzo.bianconi@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=Jose.Abreu@synopsys.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@foss.st.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=boon.leong.ong@intel.com \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@kernel.org \
--cc=hawk@kernel.org \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=maxime.chevallier@bootlin.com \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev-bot+sashiko@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=o.rempel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox