From: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>
To: "eric.auger@redhat.com" <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
"iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org"
<iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Jean-Philippe Brucker <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>,
"lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>,
"joro@8bytes.org" <joro@8bytes.org>,
"robin.murphy@arm.com" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"will@kernel.org" <will@kernel.org>,
wanghuiqiang <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>,
"Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)" <guohanjun@huawei.com>,
"steven.price@arm.com" <steven.price@arm.com>,
"Sami.Mujawar@arm.com" <Sami.Mujawar@arm.com>,
"jon@solid-run.com" <jon@solid-run.com>,
yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 10:50:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b05a6b6cc10143839be5aec384ba3099@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b546b40c-d047-87a4-1892-1bb9575ecab7@redhat.com>
Hi Eric,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Eric Auger [mailto:eric.auger@redhat.com]
> Sent: 30 September 2021 10:48
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org;
> iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org; Jean-Philippe Brucker
> <Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com>
> Cc: Linuxarm <linuxarm@huawei.com>; lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com;
> joro@8bytes.org; robin.murphy@arm.com; will@kernel.org; wanghuiqiang
> <wanghuiqiang@huawei.com>; Guohanjun (Hanjun Guo)
> <guohanjun@huawei.com>; steven.price@arm.com; Sami.Mujawar@arm.com;
> jon@solid-run.com; yangyicong <yangyicong@huawei.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node
>
> Hi Shameer,
>
> On 8/5/21 10:07 AM, Shameer Kolothum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > The series adds support to IORT RMR nodes specified in IORT
> > Revision E.b -ARM DEN 0049E[0]. RMR nodes are used to describe
> > memory ranges that are used by endpoints and require a unity
> > mapping in SMMU.
>
> I used your series and RMRs to force a guest iommu (vSMMUv3 nested stage
> use case) to have a flat mapping for IOVAs within [0x8000000, 0x8100000]
> (matching MSI_IOVA_BASE and MSI_IOVA_LENGTH) used by the host to map
> MSI
> physical doorbells.
>
> That way when an assigned device protected by a vSMMUv3 implemented
> upon
> nested stage issues an MSI transaction, let's say using IOVA=0x8000000,
> we would get:
> S1 (guest) S2 (host)
> 0x8000000 0x8000000 Physical DB
>
> This method was suggested by Jean-Philippe (added in CC) and it
> simplifies the nested stage integration because we don't have to care
> about nested stage MSI bindings.
>
> However if I understand correctly we cannot define a range of SIDs using
> the same RMR (due to the single mapping bit which must be set, Table 5
> flags format). This is a spec restriction and not an issue with your series.
Yes. The spec currently mandates single mapping bit to be set.
>
> As VFIO devices can be hot-plugged we thus need to create as many RMR
> nodes as potential BDFs, leading to 256 * 6 = 1536 RMR nodes if you have
> 5 pcie root ports as it is usual in VMs. Then this causes some trouble
> at qemu level for instance, wrt migration. See [RFC]
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build: Add IORT RMR regions to handle MSI nested binding.
>
> Do you know if there is a plan to remove the single mapping limitation
> in the spec?
I would imagine so. In an earlier comment[1], Robin did mention about possible
relaxing of this in future spec revision.
Thanks,
Shameer
1. https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/15c7fac0-11a8-0cdb-aac3-b5d8feb8f066@arm.com/
> Thanks
>
> Eric
> >
> > We have faced issues with 3408iMR RAID controller cards which
> > fail to boot when SMMU is enabled. This is because these
> > controllers make use of host memory for various caching related
> > purposes and when SMMU is enabled the iMR firmware fails to
> > access these memory regions as there is no mapping for them.
> > IORT RMR provides a way for UEFI to describe and report these
> > memory regions so that the kernel can make a unity mapping for
> > these in SMMU.
> >
> > Change History:
> >
> > v6 --> v7
> >
> > The only change from v6 is the fix pointed out by Steve to
> > the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install in patch #8.
> >
> > Thanks to the Tested-by tags by Laurentiu with SMMUv2 and
> > Hanjun/Huiqiang with SMMUv3 for v6. I haven't added the tags
> > yet as the series still needs more review[1].
> >
> > Feedback and tests on this series is very much appreciated.
> >
> > v5 --> v6
> > - Addressed comments from Robin & Lorenzo.
> > : Moved iort_parse_rmr() to acpi_iort_init() from
> > iort_init_platform_devices().
> > : Removed use of struct iort_rmr_entry during the initial
> > parse. Using struct iommu_resv_region instead.
> > : Report RMR address alignment and overlap errors, but continue.
> > : Reworked arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() (patch # 6).
> > - Updated SMMUv2 bypass SMR code. Thanks to Jon N (patch #8).
> > - Set IOMMU protection flags(IOMMU_CACHE, IOMMU_MMIO) based
> > on Type of RMR region. Suggested by Jon N.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Shameer
> > [0] https://developer.arm.com/documentation/den0049/latest/
> > [1]
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/20210716083442.1708-1-shameerali.koloth
> um.thodi@huawei.com/T/#m043c95b869973a834b2fd57f3e1ed0325c84f3b7
> > ------
> > v4 --> v5
> > -Added a fw_data union to struct iommu_resv_region and removed
> > struct iommu_rmr (Based on comments from Joerg/Robin).
> > -Added iommu_put_rmrs() to release mem.
> > -Thanks to Steve for verifying on SMMUv2, but not added the Tested-by
> > yet because of the above changes.
> >
> > v3 -->v4
> > -Included the SMMUv2 SMR bypass install changes suggested by
> > Steve(patch #7)
> > -As per Robin's comments, RMR reserve implementation is now
> > more generic (patch #8) and dropped v3 patches 8 and 10.
> > -Rebase to 5.13-rc1
> >
> > RFC v2 --> v3
> > -Dropped RFC tag as the ACPICA header changes are now ready to be
> > part of 5.13[0]. But this series still has a dependency on that patch.
> > -Added IORT E.b related changes(node flags, _DSM function 5 checks for
> > PCIe).
> > -Changed RMR to stream id mapping from M:N to M:1 as per the spec and
> > discussion here[1].
> > -Last two patches add support for SMMUv2(Thanks to Jon Nettleton!)
> > ------
> >
> > Jon Nettleton (1):
> > iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR
> >
> > Shameer Kolothum (8):
> > iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region
> > ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing
> > iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info
> > ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions
> > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper
> > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force
> > bypass
> > iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE
> > iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev
> >
> > drivers/acpi/arm64/iort.c | 172
> +++++++++++++++++++-
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3.c | 76 +++++++--
> > drivers/iommu/arm/arm-smmu/arm-smmu.c | 48 ++++++
> > drivers/iommu/dma-iommu.c | 89 +++++++++-
> > include/linux/acpi_iort.h | 7 +
> > include/linux/dma-iommu.h | 13 ++
> > include/linux/iommu.h | 11 ++
> > 7 files changed, 393 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> >
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-30 10:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-08-05 8:07 [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu: Introduce a union to struct iommu_resv_region Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-20 10:22 ` Steven Price
2021-10-08 12:14 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09 6:57 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 5:47 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-11 13:47 ` Robin Murphy
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 2/9] ACPI/IORT: Add support for RMR node parsing Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 16:03 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 16:31 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-08-05 18:37 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-09-06 17:44 ` Robin Murphy
2021-09-06 19:51 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 7:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16 7:52 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-16 8:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-09-16 11:16 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-17 11:26 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-10-05 10:53 ` Laurentiu Tudor
2021-10-08 12:48 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09 7:06 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 14:04 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-12 8:00 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 12:18 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-12-08 13:26 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-12-08 14:37 ` Robin Murphy
2021-12-08 15:11 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 5:59 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/dma: Introduce generic helper to retrieve RMR info Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:03 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 5:51 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 4/9] ACPI/IORT: Add a helper to retrieve RMR memory regions Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 15:43 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce strtab init helper Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 6/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Refactor arm_smmu_init_bypass_stes() to force bypass Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 7/9] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Get associated RMR info and install bypass STE Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/arm-smmu: Get associated RMR info and install bypass SMR Shameer Kolothum
2021-08-05 8:07 ` [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/dma: Reserve any RMR regions associated with a dev Shameer Kolothum
2021-10-08 13:09 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-09 7:07 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-10-11 15:00 ` Robin Murphy
2021-10-11 15:42 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 13:22 ` [PATCH v7 0/9] ACPI/IORT: Support for IORT RMR node Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-05 13:35 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2021-08-05 14:09 ` Ard Biesheuvel
2021-08-31 5:06 ` Jon Nettleton
2021-09-30 9:47 ` Eric Auger
2021-09-30 10:50 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi [this message]
2022-01-25 13:00 ` Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
2022-01-25 19:30 ` Robin Murphy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b05a6b6cc10143839be5aec384ba3099@huawei.com \
--to=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
--cc=Jean-Philippe.Brucker@arm.com \
--cc=Sami.Mujawar@arm.com \
--cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
--cc=guohanjun@huawei.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=jon@solid-run.com \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linuxarm@huawei.com \
--cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=steven.price@arm.com \
--cc=wanghuiqiang@huawei.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=yangyicong@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).