From: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
To: <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>, <chunkuang.hu@kernel.org>,
<p.zabel@pengutronix.de>, <airlied@linux.ie>, <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
<matthias.bgg@gmail.com>, <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
Cc: <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
<Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com>,
<linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4, 2/4] drm/mediatek: Separate poweron/poweroff from enable/disable and define new funcs
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2022 15:31:31 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b1edb995f5dba2f8e313192a79cfc0972b7c832f.camel@mediatek.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1649644308-8455-3-git-send-email-xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>
Hi, Xinlei:
On Mon, 2022-04-11 at 10:31 +0800, xinlei.lee@mediatek.com wrote:
> From: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
>
> In order to match the changes of "Use the drm_panel_bridge API",
> the poweron/poweroff of dsi is extracted from enable/disable and
> defined as new funcs (pre_enable/post_disable).
>
> Fixes: 2dd8075d2185 ("drm/mediatek: mtk_dsi: Use the drm_panel_bridge
> API")
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@mediatek.com>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c | 51 +++++++++++++++++++---------
> --
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> index 262c027d8c2f..cf76c53a1af6 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/mtk_dsi.c
> @@ -679,16 +679,6 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
> if (--dsi->refcount != 0)
> return;
>
> - /*
> - * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
> - * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after
> mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
> - * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable
> irq.
> - * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in
> mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
> - * after dsi is fully set.
> - */
> - mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
> -
> - mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
> mtk_dsi_reset_engine(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_lane0_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_clk_ulp_mode_enter(dsi);
> @@ -703,17 +693,9 @@ static void mtk_dsi_poweroff(struct mtk_dsi
> *dsi)
>
> static void mtk_output_dsi_enable(struct mtk_dsi *dsi)
> {
> - int ret;
> -
> if (dsi->enabled)
> return;
>
> - ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> - if (ret < 0) {
> - DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
> - return;
> - }
> -
> mtk_dsi_set_mode(dsi);
> mtk_dsi_clk_hs_mode(dsi, 1);
>
> @@ -727,7 +709,16 @@ static void mtk_output_dsi_disable(struct
> mtk_dsi *dsi)
> if (!dsi->enabled)
> return;
>
> - mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
> + /*
> + * mtk_dsi_stop() and mtk_dsi_start() is asymmetric, since
> + * mtk_dsi_stop() should be called after
> mtk_drm_crtc_atomic_disable(),
> + * which needs irq for vblank, and mtk_dsi_stop() will disable
> irq.
> + * mtk_dsi_start() needs to be called in
> mtk_output_dsi_enable(),
> + * after dsi is fully set.
> + */
> + mtk_dsi_stop(dsi);
> +
> + mtk_dsi_switch_to_cmd_mode(dsi, VM_DONE_INT_FLAG, 500);
>
> dsi->enabled = false;
> }
> @@ -762,13 +753,35 @@ static void mtk_dsi_bridge_enable(struct
> drm_bridge *bridge)
> {
> struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
>
> + if (dsi->refcount == 0)
> + return;
> +
> mtk_output_dsi_enable(dsi);
> }
>
> +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_pre_enable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> + int ret;
> +
> + ret = mtk_dsi_poweron(dsi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + DRM_ERROR("failed to power on dsi\n");
> +}
> +
> +static void mtk_dsi_bridge_post_disable(struct drm_bridge *bridge)
> +{
> + struct mtk_dsi *dsi = bridge_to_dsi(bridge);
> +
> + mtk_dsi_poweroff(dsi);
> +}
> +
> static const struct drm_bridge_funcs mtk_dsi_bridge_funcs = {
> .attach = mtk_dsi_bridge_attach,
> .disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_disable,
> .enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_enable,
> + .pre_enable = mtk_dsi_bridge_pre_enable,
The flow looks good to me, but according to [1], pre_enable is
deprecated. Use atomic_pre_enable instead.
[1]
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/drm/drm_bridge.h?h=v5.18-rc2#n235
> + .post_disable = mtk_dsi_bridge_post_disable,
Ditto.
Regards,
CK
> .mode_set = mtk_dsi_bridge_mode_set,
> };
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-13 7:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-11 2:31 [PATCH v4, 0/4] Cooperate with DSI RX devices to modify dsi funcs and delay mipi high to cooperate with panel sequence xinlei.lee
2022-04-11 2:31 ` [PATCH v4, 1/4] drm/mediatek: Adjust the timing of mipi signal from LP00 to LP11 xinlei.lee
2022-04-11 9:07 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-12 7:37 ` [PATCH v4,1/4] " Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-13 1:59 ` [PATCH v4, 1/4] " CK Hu
2022-04-15 2:23 ` xinlei.lee
2022-04-11 2:31 ` [PATCH v4, 2/4] drm/mediatek: Separate poweron/poweroff from enable/disable and define new funcs xinlei.lee
2022-04-11 9:07 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-12 7:38 ` [PATCH v4,2/4] " Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-13 7:31 ` CK Hu [this message]
2022-04-15 2:30 ` [PATCH v4, 2/4] " xinlei.lee
2022-04-11 2:31 ` [PATCH v4, 3/4] drm/mediatek: keep dsi as LP00 before dcs cmds transfer xinlei.lee
2022-04-11 9:07 ` AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
2022-04-12 7:43 ` Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-12 13:09 ` xinlei.lee
2022-04-12 13:07 ` xinlei.lee
2022-04-13 8:31 ` CK Hu
2022-04-15 1:58 ` xinlei.lee
2022-04-29 7:24 ` CK Hu
2022-04-11 2:31 ` [PATCH v4, 4/4] drm/mediatek: Add pull-down MIPI operation in mtk_dsi_poweroff function xinlei.lee
2022-04-12 7:39 ` [PATCH v4,4/4] " Rex-BC Chen
2022-04-13 9:04 ` [PATCH v4, 4/4] " CK Hu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b1edb995f5dba2f8e313192a79cfc0972b7c832f.camel@mediatek.com \
--to=ck.hu@mediatek.com \
--cc=Project_Global_Chrome_Upstream_Group@mediatek.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=chunkuang.hu@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=jitao.shi@mediatek.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=matthias.bgg@gmail.com \
--cc=p.zabel@pengutronix.de \
--cc=rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com \
--cc=xinlei.lee@mediatek.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).