linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: okaya@codeaurora.org (Sinan Kaya)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2018 22:59:13 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8355df0-f3ba-c8c8-ccbb-53b1a294eab6@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1522695990-31082-1-git-send-email-okaya@codeaurora.org>

Alex,

On 4/2/2018 3:06 PM, Sinan Kaya wrote:
> Code includes wmb() followed by writel() in multiple places. writel()
> already has a barrier on some architectures like arm64.
> 
> This ends up CPU observing two barriers back to back before executing the
> register write.
> 
> Since code already has an explicit barrier call, changing writel() to
> writel_relaxed().
> 
> I did a regex search for wmb() followed by writel() in each drivers
> directory. I scrubbed the ones I care about in this series.
> 
> I considered "ease of change", "popular usage" and "performance critical
> path" as the determining criteria for my filtering.
> 
> We used relaxed API heavily on ARM for a long time but
> it did not exist on other architectures. For this reason, relaxed
> architectures have been paying double penalty in order to use the common
> drivers.
> 
> Now that relaxed API is present on all architectures, we can go and scrub
> all drivers to see what needs to change and what can remain.
> 
> We start with mostly used ones and hope to increase the coverage over time.
> It will take a while to cover all drivers.
> 
> Feel free to apply patches individually.
> 
> Change since 7:
> 
> * API clarification with Linus and several architecture folks regarding
> writel()
> 
> https://www.mail-archive.com/netdev at vger.kernel.org/msg225806.html
> 
> * removed wmb() in front of writel() at several places.
> * remove old IA64 comments regarding ordering.
> 

What do you think about this version? Did I miss any SMP barriers?


> Sinan Kaya (7):
>   i40e/i40evf: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
>   ixgbe: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
>   igbvf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
>   igb: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
>   fm10k: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
>   ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb()
>   ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs
> 
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/fm10k/fm10k_main.c     | 15 ++-----------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40e/i40e_txrx.c       | 22 ++++++++----------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40e_txrx.c     |  8 +------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/igb_main.c         | 14 ++----------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igbvf/netdev.c         | 16 +++++---------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c     | 23 ++-----------------
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf.h      |  5 -----
>  drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbevf/ixgbevf_main.c | 27 ++++++++---------------
>  8 files changed, 30 insertions(+), 100 deletions(-)
> 

Sinan

-- 
Sinan Kaya
Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies, Inc. as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2018-04-03  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-04-02 19:06 [PATCH v8 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 1/7] i40e/i40evf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 2/7] ixgbe: eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 3/7] igbvf: " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 4/7] igb: " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 5/7] fm10k: Eliminate " Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 6/7] ixgbevf: keep writel() closer to wmb() Sinan Kaya
2018-04-02 19:06 ` [PATCH v8 7/7] ixgbevf: eliminate duplicate barriers on weakly-ordered archs Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03  2:59 ` Sinan Kaya [this message]
2018-04-03 17:47   ` [PATCH v8 0/7] netdev: intel: Eliminate " Alexander Duyck
2018-04-03 17:50     ` Sinan Kaya
2018-04-03 18:26       ` Jeff Kirsher

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b8355df0-f3ba-c8c8-ccbb-53b1a294eab6@codeaurora.org \
    --to=okaya@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).