From: lersek@redhat.com (Laszlo Ersek)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: aarch64 ACPI boot regressed by commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must bind to node0")
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2016 17:27:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b8b58d52-691c-11f0-2d26-a51e03430771@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d26ea7ca-6b65-b3a6-591e-ab892f1815e7@redhat.com>
On 10/14/16 17:01, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> Maybe the code I
> tried to analyze in this email was never *meant* to associate CPU#0 with
> any NUMA node at all (not even node 0); instead, other code -- for
> example code removed by 7ba5f605f3a0 -- was meant to perform that
> association.
Staring a bit more at the code, this looks very likely; in acpi_map_gic_cpu_interface() we have
> /* Check if GICC structure of boot CPU is available in the MADT */
> if (cpu_logical_map(0) == hwid) {
> if (bootcpu_valid) {
> pr_err("duplicate boot CPU MPIDR: 0x%llx in MADT\n",
> hwid);
> return;
> }
> bootcpu_valid = true;
> return;
> }
which means that this callback function (for parsing the GICC structures in the MADT) expects to find the boot processor as well.
Upon finding the boot processor, we set bootcpu_valid to true, and that's it -- no association with any NUMA node, and no incrementing of "cpu_count".
Thanks
Laszlo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-14 15:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-13 22:50 aarch64 ACPI boot regressed by commit 7ba5f605f3a0 ("arm64/numa: remove the limitation that cpu0 must bind to node0") Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-14 8:05 ` Andrew Jones
2016-10-14 13:18 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-14 13:44 ` Andrew Jones
2016-10-14 15:45 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-14 15:01 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-14 15:27 ` Laszlo Ersek [this message]
2016-10-14 15:42 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-10-14 16:22 ` Laszlo Ersek
2016-10-14 16:58 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-10-17 8:04 ` Leizhen (ThunderTown)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b8b58d52-691c-11f0-2d26-a51e03430771@redhat.com \
--to=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).