From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EC0BEC433F5 for ; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:03:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=oMfzZEiVG+aA6tmGQ5I7EW0yNHVc3wa0QY/VCaPjtyk=; b=kuFeHtuuIwvqN0 6k70bGyNTsKN5MWKH1LHiv+rvYk83EEPTjk1S+ouyyqCMctXInaYzClFgwXhb5QitDQY3m0Z8Jiph Kg95Q1HvN0aY4F76KYU8eHUYd891kymbixpFpYqcQoWoVEElpIFG3jRnXCyzdHby4W2zFQWL77wf3 bI6H85RA37WDZf4yC/GPjKMNZEd0w/uqSz3/scyj8gvDghhbm0zV2we+Pm8W1ll4ZaKDW3CUFF8J7 h/e+GTjwLcqLs4o4Sd5GZwzPgWtmYQTEB4c3vLkjYzpOfkX2E/8ckLI4xsoBmUjw4v1frocyHOAp6 4QDNLGcslFANjLy8bvpA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1njCOq-00CMa7-I5; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:02:04 +0000 Received: from szxga02-in.huawei.com ([45.249.212.188]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1njCOn-00CMXZ-89 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 04:02:03 +0000 Received: from kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga02-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4KnSn01gVSzGpJf; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 11:59:16 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.111.192] (10.67.111.192) by kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.24; Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:01:50 +0800 Message-ID: Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2022 12:01:50 +0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 4/6] bpf, arm64: Impelment bpf_arch_text_poke() for arm64 Content-Language: en-US To: Jakub Sitnicki CC: , , , , , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Steven Rostedt , Ingo Molnar , Daniel Borkmann , Alexei Starovoitov , Zi Shen Lim , Andrii Nakryiko , Martin KaFai Lau , Song Liu , Yonghong Song , John Fastabend , KP Singh , "David S . Miller" , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , David Ahern , Thomas Gleixner , Borislav Petkov , Dave Hansen , , , Shuah Khan , Mark Rutland , Ard Biesheuvel , Pasha Tatashin , Peter Collingbourne , Daniel Kiss , Sudeep Holla , Steven Price , Marc Zyngier , Mark Brown , Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi , Delyan Kratunov , References: <20220414162220.1985095-1-xukuohai@huawei.com> <20220414162220.1985095-5-xukuohai@huawei.com> <87levxfj32.fsf@cloudflare.com> <13cd161b-43a2-ce66-6a27-6662fc36e063@huawei.com> <87pml56xsr.fsf@cloudflare.com> From: Xu Kuohai In-Reply-To: <87pml56xsr.fsf@cloudflare.com> X-Originating-IP: [10.67.111.192] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems703-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.180) To kwepemi500013.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.120) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220425_210201_485355_50ECC286 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 10.60 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 4/25/2022 10:26 PM, Jakub Sitnicki wrote: > On Sun, Apr 24, 2022 at 01:05 PM +08, Xu Kuohai wrote: >> Thanks for your testing and suggestion! I added bpf2bpf poking to this >> series and rebased it to [2] a few days ago, so there are some conflicts >> with the bpf-next branch. I'll rebase it to bpf-next and send v3. >> >> [2] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20220416042940.656344-1-kuifeng@fb.com/ > > Looking forward to it. > > I think it would be okay to post v3 saying that it depends on the > "Attach a cookie to a tracing program" series and won't apply cleanly to > bpf-next with out. > > It would give us more time to review. > . Ah, already sent v3 based on bpf-next :(, will send an update after [2] is merged. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel