From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: m.niestroj@grinn-global.com (Marcin Niestroj)
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:16:49 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: dts: imx6ul: Add DTS for liteSOM module
In-Reply-To: <CAOMZO5Cp_ihOa9Z1r5_NiDqiGB+ZfpUn4n5xG95DMA27T=WX0A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20160909103906.15209-1-m.niestroj@grinn-global.com>
 <CAOMZO5AmXRs9eqzvOc8WOVc_xzZJFN8DOoOddw22WALqU66u6w@mail.gmail.com>
 <de2e41be-ad69-ce4b-57fe-3215bc9811ad@grinn-global.com>
 <CAOMZO5Cp_ihOa9Z1r5_NiDqiGB+ZfpUn4n5xG95DMA27T=WX0A@mail.gmail.com>
Message-ID: <b9766440-d35d-b931-2883-3dcc11425337@grinn-global.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On 12.09.2016 12:36, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 12, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Marcin Niestroj
> <m.niestroj@grinn-global.com> wrote:
>
>>> Is it possible to use a dual GPLv2/X11 license?
>>
>> It is possible. But why should we do that?
>
> So that non-Linux users could reuse the dts. There are many dual
> licence examples in arch/arm/boot/dts.

We are including imx6ul.dtsi which is GPLv2 only. Do you plan to
relicense it?

What do you mean by non-Linux users? What other projects are using dts?


-- 
Marcin Niestroj