linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/9] treewide: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in header files
Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2025 11:07:13 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ba1499c3-47ca-42ed-a0d7-74c5ee768132@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251121100044.282684-1-thuth@redhat.com>

On 21/11/2025 11.00, Thomas Huth wrote:
>   Hi Arnd!
> 
> Could you please help to get the remaining patches of this macro
> renaming series merged? I already got most patches from the initial
> version merged through the architecture specific trees (thanks to every
> maintainer who helped me here!), but for alpha and arm 32-bit, I did
> not manage to get the attention of the maintainers. Hexagon got an
> Acked-by by Brian, but the patches did not get merged yet.

Sorry, forgot to mention: csky and arm64 are still in linux-next and not in 
Linus' master branch yet, so they need to get merged first.

  Thomas


> Anyway, original patch series description follows:
> 
> The kernel Makefiles define the __ASSEMBLY__ macro to provide
> a way to use headers in both, assembly and C source code.
> However, all the supported versions of the GCC and Clang compilers
> also define the macro __ASSEMBLER__ automatically already when compiling
> assembly code, so some kernel headers are using __ASSEMBLER__ instead.
> With regards to userspace code, this seems also to be constant source
> of confusion, see for example these links here:
> 
>   https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20250222014526.2302653-1-seanjc@google.com/
>   https://stackoverflow.com/questions/28924355/gcc-assembler-preprocessor-not-compatible-with-standard-headers
>   https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?p=1652944#p1653834
>   https://github.com/riscv-software-src/opensbi/issues/199
> 
> To avoid confusion in the future, it would make sense to standardize
> on the macro that gets defined by the compiler, so this patch series
> changes all occurances of __ASSEMBLY__ into __ASSEMBLER__ and
> finally removes the -D__ASSEMBLY__ from the Makefiles.
> 
> I split the patches per architecture to ease the review, and I also
> split the uapi headers from the normal ones in case we decide that
> uapi needs to be treated differently from the normal headers here.
> 
> v4:
> - Most patches from the original series got already merged via the
>    tree of the individual architectures, so the amount of patches here
>    has been greatly reduced
> - Rebased patches on top of linux-next, fixed conflicts and new
>    occurances
> 
> Thomas Huth (9):
>    alpha: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in the alpha headers
>    arm: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in uapi headers
>    arm: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers
>    hexagon: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in uapi headers
>    hexagon: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers
>    uapi: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in uapi headers
>    include: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers
>    x86/headers: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ stragglers with __ASSEMBLER__
>    treewide: Stop defining __ASSEMBLY__ for assembler files



      parent reply	other threads:[~2025-11-21 10:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21 10:00 [PATCH v4 0/9] treewide: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in header files Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] alpha: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in the alpha headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-29 23:00   ` Magnus Lindholm
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] arm: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in uapi headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] arm: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] hexagon: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in uapi headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] hexagon: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] uapi: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in uapi headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] include: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ with __ASSEMBLER__ in non-uapi headers Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] x86/headers: Replace __ASSEMBLY__ stragglers with __ASSEMBLER__ Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:00 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] treewide: Stop defining __ASSEMBLY__ for assembler files Thomas Huth
2025-11-21 10:07 ` Thomas Huth [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ba1499c3-47ca-42ed-a0d7-74c5ee768132@redhat.com \
    --to=thuth@redhat.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).