From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matthias.bgg@gmail.com (Matthias Brugger) Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 14:52:38 +0200 Subject: [PATCH v4 2/2] arm: dts: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c device node In-Reply-To: <1497349452.930.36.camel@mhfsdcap03> References: <1495784107-6711-1-git-send-email-jun.gao@mediatek.com> <1495784107-6711-3-git-send-email-jun.gao@mediatek.com> <1497268468.930.26.camel@mhfsdcap03> <1497349452.930.36.camel@mhfsdcap03> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 13/06/17 12:24, Jun Gao wrote: > On Tue, 2017-06-13 at 11:36 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: >> >> On 12/06/17 13:54, Jun Gao wrote: >>> On Fri, 2017-05-26 at 15:35 +0800, Jun Gao wrote: >>>> From: Jun Gao >>>> >>>> Add MT2701 i2c device node. >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Jun Gao >>>> --- >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701-evb.dts | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> arch/arm/boot/dts/mt2701.dtsi | 42 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 2 files changed, 84 insertions(+) >> [...] >>> >>> Dear Matthias, >>> >>> Could you take this patch together with >>> [PATCH v4 1/2]dt-bindings: i2c: Add Mediatek MT2701 i2c binding ? >>> >>> Thanks! >>> >> >> They are both included in the pull request I send [1] [2], or do I miss >> something? >> >> Regards, >> Matthias >> >> [1] >> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/729b7f8dbdaff270c53052897ea06486221a49a2 >> [2] >> https://github.com/mbgg/linux-mediatek/commit/c6c301d3ff7531894257acc4f4a73928a109bda1 > > Dear Matthias, > > Would you mind to use the same style as follows in i2c-mtk.txt of [2]? > > "mediatek,mt2701-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT2701 > "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT6577 > "mediatek,mt6589-i2c": for Mediatek MT6589 > "mediatek,mt7623-i2c", "mediatek,mt6577-i2c": for Mediatek MT7623 > "mediatek,mt8173-i2c": for Mediatek MT8173 > > > Thanks! > You mean I should fix-up the patch to fit to the new binding description? Or do you mean it should be MTxxxx instead of mtxxxx? Regards, Matthias