Re: [PATCH v6 13/27] KVM: arm64/sve: Context switch the SVE registers

[Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>]

On 19/03/2019 17:52, Dave Martin wrote:
> In order to give each vcpu its own view of the SVE registers, this
> patch adds context storage via a new sve_state pointer in struct
> vcpu_arch.  An additional member sve_max_vl is also added for each
> vcpu, to determine the maximum vector length visible to the guest
> and thus the value to be configured in ZCR_EL2.LEN while the vcpu
> is active.  This also determines the layout and size of the storage
> in sve_state, which is read and written by the same backend
> functions that are used for context-switching the SVE state for
> host tasks.
> 
> On SVE-enabled vcpus, SVE access traps are now handled by switching
> in the vcpu's SVE context and disabling the trap before returning
> to the guest.  On other vcpus, the trap is not handled and an exit
> back to the host occurs, where the handle_sve() fallback path
> reflects an undefined instruction exception back to the guest,
> consistently with the behaviour of non-SVE-capable hardware (as was
> done unconditionally prior to this patch).
> 
> No SVE handling is added on non-VHE-only paths, since VHE is an
> architectural and Kconfig prerequisite of SVE.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@arm.com>
> 

Reviewed-by: Julien Thierry <julien.thierry@arm.com>

> ---
> 
> Changes since v5:
> 
>  * [Julien Thierry, Julien Grall] Commit message typo fixes
> 
>  * [Mark Rutland] Rename trap_class to hsr_ec, for consistency with
>    existing code.
> 
>  * [Mark Rutland] Simplify condition for refusing to handle an
>    FPSIMD/SVE trap, using multiple if () statements for clarity.  The
>    previous condition was a bit tortuous, and how that the static_key
>    checks have been hoisted out, it makes little difference to the
>    compiler how we express the condition here.
> ---
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h |  6 ++++
>  arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c           |  5 +--
>  arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c       | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
>  3 files changed, 66 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> index 22cf484..4fabfd2 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> @@ -228,6 +228,8 @@ struct vcpu_reset_state {
>  
>  struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	struct kvm_cpu_context ctxt;
> +	void *sve_state;
> +	unsigned int sve_max_vl;
>  
>  	/* HYP configuration */
>  	u64 hcr_el2;
> @@ -323,6 +325,10 @@ struct kvm_vcpu_arch {
>  	bool sysregs_loaded_on_cpu;
>  };
>  
> +/* Pointer to the vcpu's SVE FFR for sve_{save,load}_state() */
> +#define vcpu_sve_pffr(vcpu) ((void *)((char *)((vcpu)->arch.sve_state) + \
> +				      sve_ffr_offset((vcpu)->arch.sve_max_vl)))
> +
>  /* vcpu_arch flags field values: */
>  #define KVM_ARM64_DEBUG_DIRTY		(1 << 0)
>  #define KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED		(1 << 1) /* guest FP regs loaded */
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
> index 7053bf4..6e3c9c8 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/fpsimd.c
> @@ -87,10 +87,11 @@ void kvm_arch_vcpu_ctxsync_fp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  
>  	if (vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_FP_ENABLED) {
>  		fpsimd_bind_state_to_cpu(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.fp_regs,
> -					 NULL, SVE_VL_MIN);
> +					 vcpu->arch.sve_state,
> +					 vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl);
>  
>  		clear_thread_flag(TIF_FOREIGN_FPSTATE);
> -		clear_thread_flag(TIF_SVE);
> +		update_thread_flag(TIF_SVE, vcpu_has_sve(vcpu));
>  	}
>  }
>  
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> index 9d46066..5444b9c 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c
> @@ -100,7 +100,10 @@ static void activate_traps_vhe(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	val = read_sysreg(cpacr_el1);
>  	val |= CPACR_EL1_TTA;
>  	val &= ~CPACR_EL1_ZEN;
> -	if (!update_fp_enabled(vcpu)) {
> +	if (update_fp_enabled(vcpu)) {
> +		if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
> +			val |= CPACR_EL1_ZEN;
> +	} else {
>  		val &= ~CPACR_EL1_FPEN;
>  		__activate_traps_fpsimd32(vcpu);
>  	}
> @@ -317,16 +320,48 @@ static bool __hyp_text __populate_fault_info(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  	return true;
>  }
>  
> -static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
> +/* Check for an FPSIMD/SVE trap and handle as appropriate */
> +static bool __hyp_text __hyp_handle_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  {
> -	struct user_fpsimd_state *host_fpsimd = vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state;
> +	bool vhe, sve_guest, sve_host;
> +	u8 hsr_ec;
>  
> -	if (has_vhe())
> -		write_sysreg(read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) | CPACR_EL1_FPEN,
> -			     cpacr_el1);
> -	else
> +	if (!system_supports_fpsimd())
> +		return false;
> +
> +	if (system_supports_sve()) {
> +		sve_guest = vcpu_has_sve(vcpu);
> +		sve_host = vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_IN_USE;
> +		vhe = true;
> +	} else {
> +		sve_guest = false;
> +		sve_host = false;
> +		vhe = has_vhe();
> +	}
> +
> +	hsr_ec = kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu);
> +	if (hsr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD &&
> +	    hsr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_SVE)
> +		return false;
> +
> +	/* Don't handle SVE traps for non-SVE vcpus here: */
> +	if (!sve_guest)
> +		if (hsr_ec != ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD)
> +			return false;
> +
> +	/* Valid trap.  Switch the context: */
> +
> +	if (vhe) {
> +		u64 reg = read_sysreg(cpacr_el1) | CPACR_EL1_FPEN;
> +
> +		if (sve_guest)
> +			reg |= CPACR_EL1_ZEN;
> +
> +		write_sysreg(reg, cpacr_el1);
> +	} else {
>  		write_sysreg(read_sysreg(cptr_el2) & ~(u64)CPTR_EL2_TFP,
>  			     cptr_el2);
> +	}
>  
>  	isb();
>  
> @@ -335,24 +370,28 @@ static bool __hyp_text __hyp_switch_fpsimd(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
>  		 * In the SVE case, VHE is assumed: it is enforced by
>  		 * Kconfig and kvm_arch_init().
>  		 */
> -		if (system_supports_sve() &&
> -		    (vcpu->arch.flags & KVM_ARM64_HOST_SVE_IN_USE)) {
> +		if (sve_host) {
>  			struct thread_struct *thread = container_of(
> -				host_fpsimd,
> +				vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state,
>  				struct thread_struct, uw.fpsimd_state);
>  
> -			sve_save_state(sve_pffr(thread), &host_fpsimd->fpsr);
> +			sve_save_state(sve_pffr(thread),
> +				       &vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state->fpsr);
>  		} else {
> -			__fpsimd_save_state(host_fpsimd);
> +			__fpsimd_save_state(vcpu->arch.host_fpsimd_state);
>  		}
>  
>  		vcpu->arch.flags &= ~KVM_ARM64_FP_HOST;
>  	}
>  
> -	__fpsimd_restore_state(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.fp_regs);
> -
> -	if (vcpu_has_sve(vcpu))
> +	if (sve_guest) {
> +		sve_load_state(vcpu_sve_pffr(vcpu),
> +			       &vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.fp_regs.fpsr,
> +			       sve_vq_from_vl(vcpu->arch.sve_max_vl) - 1);
>  		write_sysreg_s(vcpu->arch.ctxt.sys_regs[ZCR_EL1], SYS_ZCR_EL12);
> +	} else {
> +		__fpsimd_restore_state(&vcpu->arch.ctxt.gp_regs.fp_regs);
> +	}
>  
>  	/* Skip restoring fpexc32 for AArch64 guests */
>  	if (!(read_sysreg(hcr_el2) & HCR_RW))
> @@ -388,10 +427,10 @@ static bool __hyp_text fixup_guest_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *exit_code)
>  	 * and restore the guest context lazily.
>  	 * If FP/SIMD is not implemented, handle the trap and inject an
>  	 * undefined instruction exception to the guest.
> +	 * Similarly for trapped SVE accesses.
>  	 */
> -	if (system_supports_fpsimd() &&
> -	    kvm_vcpu_trap_get_class(vcpu) == ESR_ELx_EC_FP_ASIMD)
> -		return __hyp_switch_fpsimd(vcpu);
> +	if (__hyp_handle_fpsimd(vcpu))
> +		return true;
>  
>  	if (!__populate_fault_info(vcpu))
>  		return true;
> 

-- 
Julien Thierry

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel