From: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
To: Dev Jain <dev.jain@arm.com>, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: ryan.roberts@arm.com, willy@infradead.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
will@kernel.org, Liam.Howlett@oracle.com,
lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com, vbabka@suse.cz, jannh@google.com,
anshuman.khandual@arm.com, peterx@redhat.com, joey.gouly@arm.com,
ioworker0@gmail.com, baohua@kernel.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com,
quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
yangyicong@hisilicon.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
namit@vmware.com, hughd@google.com, yang@os.amperecomputing.com,
ziy@nvidia.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable()
Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2025 11:15:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bbd0e5fb-ad47-4531-adde-c2c2ee2cef61@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250429052336.18912-7-dev.jain@arm.com>
On 29.04.25 07:23, Dev Jain wrote:
> In preparation for patch 7, we need to properly batch around
> can_change_pte_writable(). We batch around pte_needs_soft_dirty_wp() by
> the corresponding fpb flag, we batch around the page-anon exclusive check
> using folio_maybe_mapped_shared(); modify_prot_start_ptes() collects the
> dirty and access bits across the batch, therefore batching across
> pte_dirty(): this is correct since the dirty bit on the PTE really
> is just an indication that the folio got written to, so even if
> the PTE is not actually dirty (but one of the PTEs in the batch is),
> the wp-fault optimization can be made.
If you want to add a batched version of can_change_pte_writable(), do it
right away instead of just adding parameters to functions.
Then, add a simple
#define can_change_pte_writable(...) can_change_ptes_writable(..., 1);
So you don't have to touch all callers and don't have to update the
function name in comments.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-29 9:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 53+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-29 5:23 [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Dev Jain
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] mm: Refactor code in mprotect Dev Jain
2025-04-29 6:41 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29 6:54 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:00 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() by batch-skipping PTEs Dev Jain
2025-04-29 7:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29 8:59 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:19 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 6:37 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 13:18 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 13:36 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] mm: Add batched versions of ptep_modify_prot_start/commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29 8:39 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-29 9:01 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 13:52 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 6:25 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 14:37 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:30 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-05-06 15:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 14:09 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-30 14:34 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-01 11:33 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-05-01 12:58 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-06 14:28 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 5:35 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30 5:45 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-30 14:16 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_start Dev Jain
2025-04-30 5:43 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30 5:49 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 6:14 ` Anshuman Khandual
2025-04-30 6:32 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] arm64: Add batched version of ptep_modify_prot_commit Dev Jain
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] mm: Batch around can_change_pte_writable() Dev Jain
2025-04-29 9:15 ` David Hildenbrand [this message]
2025-04-29 9:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 9:27 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-29 13:57 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:00 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 5:44 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06 9:16 ` Dev Jain
2025-05-06 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-04-30 6:17 ` kernel test robot
2025-04-29 5:23 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] mm: Optimize mprotect() through PTE-batching Dev Jain
2025-04-29 7:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] Optimize mprotect for large folios Lance Yang
2025-04-29 9:02 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 10:41 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-30 5:42 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-30 6:22 ` Lance Yang
2025-04-30 7:07 ` Dev Jain
2025-04-29 11:03 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-04-29 14:02 ` David Hildenbrand
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bbd0e5fb-ad47-4531-adde-c2c2ee2cef61@redhat.com \
--to=david@redhat.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=baohua@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dev.jain@arm.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=joey.gouly@arm.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=namit@vmware.com \
--cc=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=quic_zhenhuah@quicinc.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
--cc=yang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
--cc=ziy@nvidia.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).