From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D891CC433EF for ; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:54:42 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:CC:To:Subject: MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=N2ERuTZhhg2LMTYrZBnwCLQ1pBWVt6VTZM4XWlhLd8U=; b=pxuJ2del9QDaP2 4+gyTQIqJeUL1FrR9VFMbKAWaqYK1lnsneFd1dM3hoLecm6BFhbMJCfjMaPBKajYsdWE8l0J54DLZ GWk2EsNU2QaSR88e3LXE3G4b9MYZit7G5paRiVneLqLj1pUSfZIJsWuTHaKuhvwukYe/u9tYieo2t OQ+CQ3wbpv3KnpI6gBUjhzBsoFqXkoETbqGLEAxXo8U8APcHuX9Jz/dQOoHWRmYGVuPcyFGZkdWUC FdQ+7xDChp0Kzkup+nlRg3z+urNipMsvx+eOiVS8NOgT0lFV/obzXoBPOmlWoWuk1c8/5yUvG+N8M QuM0TrKKiTYa0XKf3ICw==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKdTh-009mz0-Me; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:53:33 +0000 Received: from frasgout.his.huawei.com ([185.176.79.56]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nKdTd-009mxS-CO for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:53:31 +0000 Received: from fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.147.226]) by frasgout.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4JzqrT6W4rz6F8c6; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 17:52:57 +0800 (CST) Received: from lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) by fraeml735-chm.china.huawei.com (10.206.15.216) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 10:53:25 +0100 Received: from [10.47.81.42] (10.47.81.42) by lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2308.21; Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:53:24 +0000 Message-ID: Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2022 09:53:23 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.1 Subject: Re: Test 73 Sig_trap fails on arm64 (was Re: [PATCH] perf test: Test 73 Sig_trap fails on s390) To: Leo Yan , Dmitry Vyukov CC: Will Deacon , Marco Elver , "Thomas Richter" , , , , , , , , "Mark Rutland" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" References: <90efb5a9-612a-919e-cf2f-c528692d61e2@huawei.com> <20220118091827.GA98966@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> <20220118124343.GC98966@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> <06412caf-42e4-5c4b-c9b3-9691075405bd@huawei.com> <20220215143459.GB7592@willie-the-truck> <8c582e45-0954-a2ea-764a-4dd78a464988@huawei.com> <20220216131306.GA56419@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> From: John Garry In-Reply-To: <20220216131306.GA56419@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> X-Originating-IP: [10.47.81.42] X-ClientProxiedBy: lhreml754-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.204) To lhreml724-chm.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.75) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220217_015329_601654_7F6A1BE3 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.58 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 16/02/2022 13:13, Leo Yan wrote: >> It does and fwiw I am just trying to use it. Things work only on x86 so far. > So here we have agreement to disable the cases for Arm64/Arm. > > John, since you put much efforts to follow up the issue, I'd like to > leave decision to you if you want to proceed for patches? Otherwise, > I will send patches to disable cases in perf. Hi Leo, I'll send later today. Thanks, John _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel