From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C650AC0219B for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:17:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=nopQg6glBYBF33hbfwau4+1pYX3nxBZHENZSs6upCnw=; b=FgAFd80EURM3GmnaktDOgfwpZv CTsA0ePrj7Iu8+bNyjsDj8CiBFwYXKqQYKJK6JSbj6Ou4upu73X23ReSxRNez1arTzlQTgunfOV6x pnaUdV/wY/LifR6bm2NABPXr/NZbnk31Oy0MGkQf2hHvrM9lYhsAXimt44J12QjRRZ4lVPzY0Hc6U vU87sfuGfA76eVMIebGGUItsYl7bQGgUvIwxR+Ryrh1K7s9e6ByqZzAMgcrxX3CbgYef7YnJj7zSG TbS+hnXqBBa+5hRSmJbeaJ/B5Sr5GNVDUV/5Hp/ObOs56oU0D+Eplel4ARUf1eB6PAqL+pwgrNNq/ 8brucf/A==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thq8L-00000003vB1-3uQO; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 13:17:01 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1thpqA-00000003rLn-3VjS for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:58:15 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B97075C1095; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:57:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E3E10C4CEDD; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:58:12 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739278694; bh=+towMT1nCuVs7DFgHgZTIfGgiiKqozkce+4klGi0s9E=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=DMUZ3WZj6egUmoREWZ/i5BecZ/SF//YWj68XqzGu1zV+XnFL5IV5tfvKBJR2h8fIG kleJ/Oddvmj1TDVbAFCb/eUl7+QgprOX2NQsNDecwBHjUTJL7QG1LynoofzU4fWRcl rhaqVrGBzAy3BA2tzGYOkabptSUcxl7qneA7RCbIwYZhyS47ZVh9ER25wHEZeB2gu3 mgnyKlv9XPn3btcLrlGNuy9ivTzXc5i+rrNqI4g4UJ22Cpuvtk7u3EA1OUWO26+Eg2 mxK9OT+OJxs0c3UKdgrfGSGahhZOIqFdTEOO8RHMG5f34YkBYGxxIr/IgmVFlTYFVD ZlffazOPxk9Sw== Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 12:58:10 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Mark Rutland Cc: Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Add missing registrations of SF8MMx hwcaps Message-ID: References: <20250210-arm64-fix-2024-dpisa-v1-1-d77f43c7b253@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rD0p0luEF5BMl3yP" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Printed on recycled paper. X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250211_045814_916662_FBCD8CA9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 12.92 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org --rD0p0luEF5BMl3yP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 11:37:44AM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 07:14:58PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 10, 2025 at 06:41:09PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote: > > > Looking again, it looks like KERNEL_HWCAP_FPRCVT also isn't wired up? > > Indeed. I'll add that separately. > Given that KERNEL_HWCAP_FPRCVT was also added by commit 819935464cb2, > I assume you mean you'll send a v2 of this patch doing that. Well, I was actually intending to send a separate patch given that otherwise it ends up looking like two different changelogs in the same patch and the diffs shouldn't overlap. --rD0p0luEF5BMl3yP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmerSWEACgkQJNaLcl1U h9BKtwf/XoPWbuG6MzQSQ1e31PolrljHwu4itDeKvhdyeP8GcDCDRi33tSf+K2ja KauZo++0ZKaq1Ja+MFAToO/len+b3BgCOzm0rCuiFhhtTV0ClkFun8hZ1B0FbHbC 53X8vn00Agvf7SEmOPtsmTM/FJTOMn421x9FYgM7xunf1YKj9wGnt/V7/VrBZTAm LEPUDKO6uPEQk4xl4m3LRBMHrqignAXy4ScZ9YgaIyT84cks0zI+m4UcLtIpnHsC wZ2o6Zfx0wu/DMUvESijSvUjiLeIhbk5YINhitBmKUYHV9ECgkBOonZ5XDmrrZmc c+8oJAemdZYCU0ngIvowVZ/ecC9EVg== =/UnQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rD0p0luEF5BMl3yP--