From: stepanm@codeaurora.org (stepanm at codeaurora.org)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] arm: msm: Add MSM IOMMU support.
Date: Mon, 9 Aug 2010 20:42:13 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bf2b5539fdb03a1a9c55ee1122c40b99.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1281409689.1954.96.camel@Joe-Laptop.home>
> Why use both pr_err and printk(KERN_ERR ?
I had been using pr_err for printing badness messages internal to the
driver, but I guess their functionality is largely paralleled by return
error codes. I had been using printk(KERN_ERR for messages that have been
caused by an event that is more external to the driver and its callers
(like the data for the page fault, which is most likely to be caused by a
misprogrammed client). pr_err gives other information like function name,
line number, etc, which would be noise when looking at an iommu page
fault. And, I guess if the pr_err stuff got turned off, you would want the
page fault data to still be printed... but that's kind of a minor point.
I am actually considering doing away with all the pr_err lines entirely
because they typically also result in returning -Ewhatever and other IOMMU
drivers don't give this level of error reporting. But, they may be helpful
to the users of the API. What are people's thoughts on this?
Thanks
Steve
>> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "%s %i " fmt, __func__, __LINE__
>> + pr_err("bad size: %d\n", len);
>> + pr_err("null page table\n");
>> + pr_err("could not allocate second level table\n");
>> + pr_err("null page table\n");
>> + pr_err("first level PTE is 0\n");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "FAR = %08x PAR = %08x\n",
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "FSR = %08x [%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s%s]\n", fsr,
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "FSYNR0 = %08x FSYNR1 = %08x\n",
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "TTBR0 = %08x TTBR1 = %08x\n",
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "SCTLR = %08x ACTLR = %08x\n",
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "PRRR = %08x NMRR = %08x\n",
>> + pr_err("Invalid device ID in context interrupt handler\n");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "===== WOAH! =====\n");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Unexpected IOMMU page fault!\n");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "base = %08x\n", (unsigned int) base);
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Fault occurred in context %d.\n", i);
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "Interesting registers:\n");
>> + printk(KERN_ERR "\n");
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-arm-msm"
> in
> the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-08-10 3:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-08-10 2:27 [PATCH v3] arm: msm: Add MSM IOMMU support Stepan Moskovchenko
2010-08-10 3:08 ` Joe Perches
2010-08-10 3:42 ` stepanm at codeaurora.org [this message]
2010-08-10 5:36 ` Joe Perches
2010-08-10 19:22 ` stepanm at codeaurora.org
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bf2b5539fdb03a1a9c55ee1122c40b99.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org \
--to=stepanm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).