Re: [PATCH 00/20] iio: make masklength __private (round 1)

["Nuno Sá" <noname.nuno@gmail.com>]

On Tue, 2024-07-02 at 21:26 +0100, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 02 Jul 2024 18:02:32 +0200
> Nuno Sa via B4 Relay <devnull+nuno.sa.analog.com@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jonathan,
> > 
> > Here it goes the first round of what we discussed in [1] about
> > annotating .masklength as __private. Patches should be fairly simple so
> > hopefully I did not messed up much...
> > 
> > Note that in core, there's one place where we're still directly writing
> > into .masklength (when it's effectively set). The plan is then to
> > directly use ACCESS_PRIVATE() in there in the same patch where we mark
> > .masklength as __private.
> 
> Makes sense. Series looks good to me, but I'll not pick it up just yet.
> I've tagged a like second 6.11 pull request, so this is probably 6.12 material
> unless things go particularly smoothly and Greg takes an additional last
> minute one as there is one set waiting for a fix that is in char-misc
> but not yet iio-togreg.
> 
> Jonathan
> 

Yeah, looks sane to me. Advantage of going in 6.12 is that (likely) we'' get all
the conversions done.

- Nuno Sá
>