From: Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org>
To: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Mulu He <muluhe@codeaurora.org>,
David Laight <David.Laight@aculab.com>,
Tingwei Zhang <tingwei@codeaurora.org>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@st.com>,
linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com,
Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
Cc: Rajendra Nayak <rnayak@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org, Sibi Sankar <sibis@codeaurora.org>,
Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] stm class: Fix out of bound access from bitmap allocation
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 09:03:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c238838c-4155-c85c-8622-64b21d16712c@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87mukqc7v8.fsf@ashishki-desk.ger.corp.intel.com>
On 4/16/2019 8:30 PM, Alexander Shishkin wrote:
> Sai Prakash Ranjan <saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org> writes:
>
>> From: Mulu He <muluhe@codeaurora.org>
>>
>> Bitmap allocation works on array of unsigned longs and
>> for stm master allocation when the number of software
>> channels is 32, 4 bytes are allocated and there is a out of
>> bound access at the first 8 bytes access of bitmap region.
>
> Does the below fix the problem for you?
>
> From fb22b9ab109b332e58d72df13563e270befbd0e3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2019 17:47:02 +0300
> Subject: [PATCH] stm class: Fix channel bitmap on 32-bit systems
>
> Commit 7bd1d4093c2f ("stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace
> Module devices") naively calculates the channel bitmap size in 64-bit
> chunks regardless of the size of underlying unsigned long, making the
> bitmap half as big on a 32-bit system. This leads to an out of bounds
> access with the upper half of the bitmap.
>
> Fix this by using BITS_TO_LONGS. While at it, convert to using
> struct_size() for the total size calculation of the master struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
> Fixes: 7bd1d4093c2f ("stm class: Introduce an abstraction for System Trace Module devices")
> Reported-by: Mulu He <muluhe@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v4.4+
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c | 6 ++----
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> index 5b5807cbcf7c..8c45e79e47db 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/stm/core.c
> @@ -166,11 +166,9 @@ stm_master(struct stm_device *stm, unsigned int idx)
> static int stp_master_alloc(struct stm_device *stm, unsigned int idx)
> {
> struct stp_master *master;
> - size_t size;
>
> - size = ALIGN(stm->data->sw_nchannels, 8) / 8;
> - size += sizeof(struct stp_master);
> - master = kzalloc(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> + master = kzalloc(struct_size(master, chan_map, BITS_TO_LONGS(stm->data->sw_nchannels)),
> + GFP_ATOMIC);
> if (!master)
> return -ENOMEM;
>
>
++ David
Yes it does fix the issue. Actually initial fix internally was using
BITS_TO_LONGS, don't no why they deferred from it.
Anyways thanks for the patch.
- Sai
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member
of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-04-17 3:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-04-05 12:22 [PATCH] stm class: Fix out of bound access from bitmap allocation Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-04-05 13:14 ` David Laight
2019-04-07 4:31 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan
2019-04-08 10:23 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-08 10:33 ` David Laight
2019-04-08 10:52 ` Robin Murphy
2019-04-08 11:13 ` David Laight
2019-04-16 15:00 ` Alexander Shishkin
2019-04-17 3:33 ` Sai Prakash Ranjan [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c238838c-4155-c85c-8622-64b21d16712c@codeaurora.org \
--to=saiprakash.ranjan@codeaurora.org \
--cc=David.Laight@aculab.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexandre.torgue@st.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com \
--cc=mathieu.poirier@linaro.org \
--cc=mcoquelin.stm32@gmail.com \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=muluhe@codeaurora.org \
--cc=rnayak@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sibis@codeaurora.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=tingwei@codeaurora.org \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).