Re: iio: xilinx-ams: shift-out-of-bounds in ams_enable_channel_sequence

* Re: iio: xilinx-ams: shift-out-of-bounds in ams_enable_channel_sequence
       [not found] <a6dd3a2f-c3e9-4781-801b-8e8e72ac9beb@linux.dev>
@ 2024-03-05 17:50 ` Sean Anderson
  2024-03-06  6:53   ` Michal Simek
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Sean Anderson @ 2024-03-05 17:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Manish Narani, Michal Simek
  Cc: Jonathan Cameron, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org

+CC Michal

The email for the listed maintainer (Anand Ashok Dumbre
<anand.ashok.dumbre@xilinx.com>) bounces. Does he still work for
Xilinx/AMD?

--Sean

On 3/5/24 12:30, Sean Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> When enabling UBSAN on a ZynqMP Ultrascale+, I see the following error during boot:
> 
> [    1.447628] ================================================================================
> [    1.447832] UBSAN: shift-out-of-bounds in ../drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c:426:16
> [    1.448019] shift exponent 66 is too large for 64-bit type 'long long unsigned int'
> [    1.448211] CPU: 2 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 6.6.20+ #90
> [    1.448368] Hardware name: xlnx,zynqmp (DT)
> [    1.448475] Call trace:
> [    1.448547]  dump_backtrace+0x9c/0x11c
> [    1.448655]  show_stack+0x18/0x24
> [    1.448749]  dump_stack_lvl+0xac/0xd4
> [    1.448853]  dump_stack+0x18/0x24
> [    1.448947]  ubsan_epilogue+0x10/0x44
> [    1.449051]  __ubsan_handle_shift_out_of_bounds+0x98/0x134
> [    1.449191]  ams_enable_channel_sequence+0x22c/0x23c
> [    1.449324]  ams_probe+0x570/0x6d4
> [    1.449423]  platform_probe+0x68/0x108
> [    1.449530]  really_probe+0x158/0x3b0
> [    1.449632]  __driver_probe_device+0x88/0x1a0
> [    1.449747]  driver_probe_device+0x3c/0x138
> [    1.449859]  __driver_attach+0xe4/0x1bc
> [    1.449964]  bus_for_each_dev+0x78/0xe0
> [    1.450068]  driver_attach+0x24/0x30
> [    1.450167]  bus_add_driver+0x110/0x240
> [    1.450271]  driver_register+0x60/0x128
> [    1.450376]  __platform_driver_register+0x28/0x34
> [    1.450500]  ams_driver_init+0x1c/0x28
> [    1.450609]  do_one_initcall+0x78/0x2c8
> [    1.450714]  kernel_init_freeable+0x2f8/0x59c
> [    1.450831]  kernel_init+0x30/0x150
> [    1.450932]  ret_from_fork+0x10/0x20
> [    1.451073] ================================================================================
> 
> When applying the following patch:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c
> index f0b71a1220e0..1ced8cff461a 100644
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/xilinx-ams.c
> @@ -414,8 +414,17 @@ static void ams_enable_channel_sequence(struct iio_dev *indio_dev)
>  
>         /* Run calibration of PS & PL as part of the sequence */
>         scan_mask = BIT(0) | BIT(AMS_PS_SEQ_MAX);
> -       for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++)
> +       for (i = 0; i < indio_dev->num_channels; i++) {
> +               if (indio_dev->channels[i].scan_index >= 64) {
> +                       const struct iio_chan_spec *chan = &indio_dev->channels[i];
> +
> +                       dev_warn(&indio_dev->dev,
> +                                "channel %d (%d %d.%d @ %lx) has scan_index %d\n",
> +                                i, chan->type, chan->channel, chan->channel2,
> +                                chan->address, chan->scan_index);
> +               }
>                 scan_mask |= BIT_ULL(indio_dev->channels[i].scan_index);
> +       }
>  
>         if (ams->ps_base) {
>                 /* put sysmon in a soft reset to change the sequence */
> 
> I see these additional outputs:
> 
> [    1.447457] iio iio:device0: channel 0 (0 0.0 @ 60) has scan_index 66
> [    1.451280] iio iio:device0: channel 1 (0 1.0 @ 6c) has scan_index 67
> [    1.451446] iio iio:device0: channel 2 (0 2.0 @ 78) has scan_index 68
> [    1.451612] iio iio:device0: channel 3 (0 3.0 @ 7c) has scan_index 69
> [    1.451777] iio iio:device0: channel 4 (0 4.0 @ 80) has scan_index 70
> [    1.451942] iio iio:device0: channel 5 (0 5.0 @ 84) has scan_index 71
> [    1.452107] iio iio:device0: channel 6 (0 6.0 @ 9c) has scan_index 72
> 
> Indicating that the issue is with the ams_ctrl_channels using the
> AMS_CTRL_CHAN_VOLTAGE macro.
> 
> --Sean

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread