Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible

From: Judith Mendez <jm@ti.com>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@kernel.org>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>,
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski+dt@linaro.org>,
	Conor Dooley <conor+dt@kernel.org>,
	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
	Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
	William Breathitt Gray <william.gray@linaro.org>,
	David Lechner <david@lechnology.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
	<devicetree@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<linux-iio@vger.kernel.org>, Nishanth Menon <nm@ti.com>,
	Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] dt-bindings: counter: Add new ti,am62-eqep compatible
Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 12:19:49 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c2c58229-8623-4765-90ab-9cbc6964ca85@ti.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240525-tall-cultural-1a3f181d39ac@spud>

Hi Conor,

On 5/25/24 10:23 AM, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Fri, May 24, 2024 at 04:30:32PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>> On 5/24/24 1:38 PM, Conor Dooley wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 23, 2024 at 06:15:10PM -0500, Judith Mendez wrote:
>>>> Add new compatible ti,am62-eqep for TI K3 devices. If a device
>>>> uses this compatible, require power-domains property.
>>>>
>>>> Since there is only one functional and interface clock for eqep,
>>>> clock-names is not really required. The clock-name also changed
>>>> for TI K3 SoCs so make clock-names optional for the new compatible
>>>> since there is only one clock that is routed to the IP.
>>>
>>> Really the clock should be named after the function it has in the IP
>>> block - it looks like "sysoutclk" is more likely the name of the clock
>>> routed to the IP rather than the role it has?
>>
>> It is the name of the clock, though id like to keep sysclkout for
>> backwards compatibility, even though the name is confusing.
> 
> FWIW, I was not suggesting that it be renamed.

Understood, thanks.

> 
> Thanks,
> Conor.

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel