From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A3C0C433FE for ; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 05:25:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:To:Subject: CC:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=mlBzUmon26D0g3CwUvfYuqwQ/iBvsAM96YeskrYWdN4=; b=V/xOr7fOJIRMsg PJQ2L7kbjJgDFKgNtDP0HPdaQKEWuVwJsT1hzzYpke/NCYWatImKf/I0W3o/r3BmvjPpja+W5LLOw fVxHHRaKj036wnEj7YCiOK/WAarqSaijvc00qLJxMuTN1ee35P/XMx+IuwNlP7xF2ovJ0TKurgJ6e sqVql0adoxifXjf77j9+LR2Ah9Ujr1ZmSfvhdoJ5ZGU2ULKN4G3aZ5cy3xnvJoEEviyAdxZJCC+mW dQSOYuw3Cl6OnpWpBXBtsqJxQY2eSInnOGtbT2oIsdk94Yz5RfWNh8nyX5c1Qs6XmN2ERAPhsOVyk 1P+NmmkhRNTYaQcclLeg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0FaC-00DNLw-P1; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 05:24:32 +0000 Received: from lelv0142.ext.ti.com ([198.47.23.249]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1p0Fa9-00DNIo-03 for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 30 Nov 2022 05:24:30 +0000 Received: from lelv0266.itg.ti.com ([10.180.67.225]) by lelv0142.ext.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2AU5O5FB043970; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:24:05 -0600 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ti.com; s=ti-com-17Q1; t=1669785845; bh=v9JCM7cinCQxkLHmBdwigheft5PArJwsd1wyyLAA4+E=; h=Date:CC:Subject:To:References:From:In-Reply-To; b=SBBfUakvyFfIRXptuT/SelEqS3T4f7LFdbob8fELr5cVDbTirwZ7DGNUM8PHXB4tf /cOA3A2GOezRaK/b03YvV4Z/fmRsYByXu/AyXNtNa9pzzVUUlsosN1ewj/cOdm9ri4 YyjiLNc4lRpWUbPmv6P6B0/RWnwaLH+YGeYn+0OI= Received: from DFLE100.ent.ti.com (dfle100.ent.ti.com [10.64.6.21]) by lelv0266.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPS id 2AU5O5sh119362 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:24:05 -0600 Received: from DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) by DFLE100.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.21) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.16; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:24:05 -0600 Received: from fllv0039.itg.ti.com (10.64.41.19) by DFLE104.ent.ti.com (10.64.6.25) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA256_P256) id 15.1.2507.16 via Frontend Transport; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:24:05 -0600 Received: from [172.24.145.61] (ileaxei01-snat2.itg.ti.com [10.180.69.6]) by fllv0039.itg.ti.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id 2AU5O0FK084785; Tue, 29 Nov 2022 23:24:01 -0600 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2022 10:54:00 +0530 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 CC: , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: ethernet: ti: am65-cpsw: Fix RGMII configuration at SPEED_10 To: Pavan Chebbi References: <20221129050639.111142-1-s-vadapalli@ti.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Siddharth Vadapalli In-Reply-To: X-EXCLAIMER-MD-CONFIG: e1e8a2fd-e40a-4ac6-ac9b-f7e9cc9ee180 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20221129_212429_166096_4534AE46 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 8.60 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org Hello, On 29/11/22 11:16, Pavan Chebbi wrote: > Looks like this patch should be directed to net-next? The commit fixed by this patch is a part of the released kernel. Thus, I think it should be a part of net instead of net-next. Please let me know. Regards, Siddharth. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel