From: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
To: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: chrisl@kernel.org, david@redhat.com, ioworker0@gmail.com,
kasong@tencent.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com,
v-songbaohua@oppo.com, x86@kernel.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, ying.huang@intel.com,
zhengtangquan@oppo.com, lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 11:40:04 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c35845be-46dc-4868-b8f7-beb44eee04cc@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250113033901.68951-5-21cnbao@gmail.com>
On 2025/1/13 11:39, Barry Song wrote:
> From: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
>
> The try_to_unmap_one() function currently handles PMD-mapped THPs
> inefficiently. It first splits the PMD into PTEs, copies the dirty
> state from the PMD to the PTEs, iterates over the PTEs to locate
> the dirty state, and then marks the THP as swap-backed. This process
> involves unnecessary PMD splitting and redundant iteration. Instead,
> this functionality can be efficiently managed in
> __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(), avoiding the extra steps and
> improving performance.
>
> The following microbenchmark redirties folios after invoking MADV_FREE,
> then measures the time taken to perform memory reclamation (actually
> set those folios swapbacked again) on the redirtied folios.
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <sys/mman.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <time.h>
>
> #define SIZE 128*1024*1024 // 128 MB
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> while(1) {
> volatile int *p = mmap(0, SIZE, PROT_READ | PROT_WRITE,
> MAP_PRIVATE | MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0);
>
> memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
> madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_FREE);
> /* redirty after MADV_FREE */
> memset((void *)p, 1, SIZE);
>
> clock_t start_time = clock();
> madvise((void *)p, SIZE, MADV_PAGEOUT);
> clock_t end_time = clock();
>
> double elapsed_time = (double)(end_time - start_time) / CLOCKS_PER_SEC;
> printf("Time taken by reclamation: %f seconds\n", elapsed_time);
>
> munmap((void *)p, SIZE);
> }
> return 0;
> }
>
> Testing results are as below,
> w/o patch:
> ~ # ./a.out
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007300 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007226 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007295 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007731 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007134 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007285 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007720 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007128 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007710 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007712 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007236 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007690 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007174 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007670 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007169 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007305 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007432 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007158 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.007133 seconds
> …
>
> w/ patch
>
> ~ # ./a.out
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002116 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002150 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002261 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002137 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002173 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002063 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002088 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002169 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002124 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002111 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002224 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002297 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002260 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002246 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002272 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002277 seconds
> Time taken by reclamation: 0.002462 seconds
> …
>
> This patch significantly speeds up try_to_unmap_one() by allowing it
> to skip redirtied THPs without splitting the PMD.
>
> Suggested-by: Baolin Wang <baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
> Suggested-by: Lance Yang <ioworker0@gmail.com>
> Signed-off-by: Barry Song <v-songbaohua@oppo.com>
> ---
> mm/huge_memory.c | 17 ++++++++++++++---
> mm/rmap.c | 11 ++++++++++-
> 2 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/huge_memory.c b/mm/huge_memory.c
> index 3d3ebdc002d5..aea49f7125f1 100644
> --- a/mm/huge_memory.c
> +++ b/mm/huge_memory.c
> @@ -3070,8 +3070,12 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> int ref_count, map_count;
> pmd_t orig_pmd = *pmdp;
>
> - if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> + if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> + folio_set_dirty(folio);
> + if (folio_test_dirty(folio) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE)) {
> + folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> return false;
> + }
>
> orig_pmd = pmdp_huge_clear_flush(vma, addr, pmdp);
>
> @@ -3098,8 +3102,15 @@ static bool __discard_anon_folio_pmd_locked(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> *
> * The only folio refs must be one from isolation plus the rmap(s).
> */
> - if (folio_test_dirty(folio) || pmd_dirty(orig_pmd) ||
> - ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> + if (pmd_dirty(orig_pmd))
> + folio_set_dirty(folio);
> + if (folio_test_dirty(folio) && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_DROPPABLE)) {
> + folio_set_swapbacked(folio);
> + set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> + return false;
> + }
> +
> + if (ref_count != map_count + 1) {
> set_pmd_at(mm, addr, pmdp, orig_pmd);
> return false;
> }
> diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
> index 3ef659310797..02c4e4b2cd7b 100644
> --- a/mm/rmap.c
> +++ b/mm/rmap.c
> @@ -1671,7 +1671,7 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> DEFINE_FOLIO_VMA_WALK(pvmw, folio, vma, address, 0);
> pte_t pteval;
> struct page *subpage;
> - bool anon_exclusive, ret = true;
> + bool anon_exclusive, lazyfree, ret = true;
> struct mmu_notifier_range range;
> enum ttu_flags flags = (enum ttu_flags)(long)arg;
> int nr_pages = 1;
> @@ -1724,9 +1724,18 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct folio *folio, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> }
>
> if (!pvmw.pte) {
> + lazyfree = folio_test_anon(folio) && !folio_test_swapbacked(folio);
You've checked lazyfree here, so can we remove the duplicate check in
unmap_huge_pmd_locked()? Then the code should be:
if (lazyfree && unmap_huge_pmd_locked(...))
goto walk_done;
> if (unmap_huge_pmd_locked(vma, pvmw.address, pvmw.pmd,
> folio))
> goto walk_done;
> + /*
> + * unmap_huge_pmd_locked has either already marked
> + * the folio as swap-backed or decided to retain it
> + * due to GUP or speculative references.
> + */
> + if (lazyfree)
> + goto walk_abort;
>
> if (flags & TTU_SPLIT_HUGE_PMD) {
> /*
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-14 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-13 3:38 [PATCH v2 0/4] mm: batched unmap lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-01-13 3:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] mm: Set folio swapbacked iff folios are dirty in try_to_unmap_one Barry Song
2025-01-13 13:19 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-13 13:20 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-13 21:56 ` Barry Song
2025-01-14 2:55 ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-14 6:05 ` Lance Yang
2025-01-13 3:38 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] mm: Support tlbbatch flush for a range of PTEs Barry Song
2025-01-13 16:48 ` Will Deacon
2025-01-14 9:52 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-01-14 10:37 ` Barry Song
2025-01-13 3:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] mm: Support batched unmap for lazyfree large folios during reclamation Barry Song
2025-01-13 3:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] mm: Avoid splitting pmd for lazyfree pmd-mapped THP in try_to_unmap Barry Song
2025-01-14 3:40 ` Baolin Wang [this message]
2025-01-14 4:09 ` Barry Song
2025-01-14 6:00 ` Barry Song
2025-01-14 7:51 ` Baolin Wang
2025-01-14 6:30 ` Lance Yang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c35845be-46dc-4868-b8f7-beb44eee04cc@linux.alibaba.com \
--to=baolin.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=chrisl@kernel.org \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=ioworker0@gmail.com \
--cc=kasong@tencent.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=v-songbaohua@oppo.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=ying.huang@intel.com \
--cc=zhengtangquan@oppo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox