From: sboyd@codeaurora.org (Stephen Boyd)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCHv2 3/7] arm64: move non-entry code out of .entry.text
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2017 14:38:17 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c35db9f2-6a4c-c85b-f01a-a4123d755a6e@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1501093110-3844-4-git-send-email-mark.rutland@arm.com>
On 07/26/2017 11:18 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> Currently, cpu_switch_to and ret_from_fork both live in .entry.text,
> though neither form the critical path for an exception entry.
>
> In subsequent patches, we will require that code in .entry.text is part
> of the critical path for exception entry, for which we can assume
> certain properties (e.g. the presence of exception regs on the stack).
>
> Neither cpu_switch_to nor ret_from_fork will meet these requirements, so
> we must most them out of .entry.text. To ensure that neither are kprobed
s/most/move/ ?
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-07-26 21:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-07-26 18:18 [PATCHv2 0/7] arm64: unwind: fix broken exception stack dump Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 1/7] arm64: Add ASM_BUG() Mark Rutland
2017-08-08 15:31 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-08 15:58 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-08 16:10 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-09 10:07 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-08-09 13:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-08-09 14:32 ` Catalin Marinas
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 2/7] arm64: consistently use bl for C exception entry Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 3/7] arm64: move non-entry code out of .entry.text Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 21:38 ` Stephen Boyd [this message]
2017-07-31 10:21 ` Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 4/7] arm64: unwind: avoid percpu indirection for irq stack Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 5/7] arm64: unwind: disregard frame.sp when validating frame pointer Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 6/7] arm64: unwind: reference pt_regs via embedded stack frame Mark Rutland
2017-07-26 18:18 ` [PATCHv2 7/7] arm64: unwind: remove sp from struct stackframe Mark Rutland
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c35db9f2-6a4c-c85b-f01a-a4123d755a6e@codeaurora.org \
--to=sboyd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).