[PATCH 21/52] mtd: rawnand: jz4780: convert driver to nand_scan()

[harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com (Harvey Hunt)]

Hi Miqu?l,

On 03/16/2018 01:38 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
> Hi Harvey,
> 
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2018 15:40:25 +0000, Harvey Hunt
> <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Miquel,
>>
>> Sorry it's taken me a little while to review your changes, a few
>> comments below:
>>
>> On 03/02/2018 05:03 PM, Miquel Raynal wrote:
>>> Two helpers have been added to the core to make ECC-related
>>> configuration between the detection phase and the final NAND scan. Use
>>> these hooks and convert the driver to just use nand_scan() instead of
>>> both nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail().
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Miquel Raynal <miquel.raynal@bootlin.com>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4780_nand.c | 30 ++++++++++++------------------
>>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4780_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4780_nand.c
>>> index e69f6ae4c539..fd5dc9d9b0c6 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4780_nand.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/jz4780_nand.c
>>> @@ -157,9 +157,8 @@ static int jz4780_nand_ecc_correct(struct mtd_info *mtd, u8 *dat,
>>>  	return jz4780_bch_correct(nfc->bch, &params, dat, read_ecc);
>>>  }
>>>  
>>> -static int jz4780_nand_init_ecc(struct jz4780_nand_chip *nand, struct device *dev)
>>> +static int jz4780_nand_attach_chip(struct nand_chip *chip)
>>>  {
>>> -	struct nand_chip *chip = &nand->chip;
>>>  	struct mtd_info *mtd = nand_to_mtd(chip);
>>>  	struct jz4780_nand_controller *nfc = to_jz4780_nand_controller(chip->controller);
>>>  	int eccbytes;
>>> @@ -170,7 +169,8 @@ static int jz4780_nand_init_ecc(struct jz4780_nand_chip *nand, struct device *de
>>>  	switch (chip->ecc.mode) {
>>>  	case NAND_ECC_HW:
>>>  		if (!nfc->bch) {
>>> -			dev_err(dev, "HW BCH selected, but BCH controller not found\n");
>>> +			dev_err(nfc->dev,
>>> +				"HW BCH selected, but BCH controller not found\n");
>>>  			return -ENODEV;
>>>  		}
>>>  
>>> @@ -179,15 +179,16 @@ static int jz4780_nand_init_ecc(struct jz4780_nand_chip *nand, struct device *de
>>>  		chip->ecc.correct = jz4780_nand_ecc_correct;
>>>  		/* fall through */
>>>  	case NAND_ECC_SOFT:
>>> -		dev_info(dev, "using %s (strength %d, size %d, bytes %d)\n",
>>> -			(nfc->bch) ? "hardware BCH" : "software ECC",
>>> -			chip->ecc.strength, chip->ecc.size, chip->ecc.bytes);
>>> +		dev_info(nfc->dev, "using %s (strength %d, size %d, bytes %d)\n",
>>> +			 (nfc->bch) ? "hardware BCH" : "software ECC",
>>> +			 chip->ecc.strength, chip->ecc.size, chip->ecc.bytes)>  		break;
>>>  	case NAND_ECC_NONE:
>>> -		dev_info(dev, "not using ECC\n");
>>> +		dev_info(nfc->dev, "not using ECC\n");
>>>  		break;
>>>  	default:
>>> -		dev_err(dev, "ECC mode %d not supported\n", chip->ecc.mode);
>>> +		dev_err(nfc->dev, "ECC mode %d not supported\n",
>>> +			chip->ecc.mode);
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>>  	}  
>> These changes seem redundant as dev is passed into the function,
>> although you could remove it from the function defintion.
> 
> That is right, I should have also removed the 'dev' parameter.
> 

That'd be great

>>
>>>  
>>> @@ -199,7 +200,7 @@ static int jz4780_nand_init_ecc(struct jz4780_nand_chip *nand, struct device *de
>>>  	eccbytes = mtd->writesize / chip->ecc.size * chip->ecc.bytes;
>>>  
>>>  	if (eccbytes > mtd->oobsize - 2) {
>>> -		dev_err(dev,
>>> +		dev_err(nfc->dev,
>>>  			"invalid ECC config: required %d ECC bytes, but only %d are available",
>>>  			eccbytes, mtd->oobsize - 2);
>>>  		return -EINVAL;
>>> @@ -279,15 +280,8 @@ static int jz4780_nand_init_chip(struct platform_device *pdev,
>>>  	chip->controller = &nfc->controller;
>>>  	nand_set_flash_node(chip, np);
>>>  
>>> -	ret = nand_scan_ident(mtd, 1, NULL);
>>> -	if (ret)
>>> -		return ret;
>>> -
>>> -	ret = jz4780_nand_init_ecc(nand, dev)  
>>
>> You've removed this call, but without it the ECC won't be initialised...
> 
> Actually it is not removed but just renamed to match the core's hook
> name. The purpose of this function is to perform any chip-related
> tuning after the identification, and the name should not limit
> ourselves to do something not related to ECC configuration.
> 

Sorry for the noise, seems I've forgotten how to read patches...

>>
>>> -	if (ret)
>>> -		return ret;
>>> -
>>> -	ret = nand_scan_tail(mtd);
>>> +	chip->ecc.attach_chip = jz4780_nand_attach_chip;  
>>
>> This function doesn't exist.
> 
> See above, the *nand_init_ecc() function has been renamed in
> *nand_attach_chip().
> 
> This hook: chip->ecc.attach_chip() will be called between
> nand_scan_ident() and nand_scan_tail() from within nand_scan().
> 

Same as above :-)

Once you remove the redundant dev param:

Acked-By: Harvey Hunt <harveyhuntnexus@gmail.com>

>>
>>> +	ret = nand_scan(mtd, 1);
>>>  	if (ret)
>>>  		return ret;
>>>  
>>>   
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Harvey
> 
> Thanks for reviewing,
> Miqu?l
> 

Thanks,

Harvey