Re: [RFC] drm/imx: upstream direction for i.MX95 display support

[Marek Vasut <marex@nabladev.com>]

On 7/7/26 4:26 AM, Liu Ying wrote:

Hi,

> I need to point out that i.MX95 display controller also has 2 display engines
> and 1 pixel engine, which is something missing in your code.  This makes me
> think that you have no enough i.MX95 display controller documents.
> 
> Generally speaking, I'd say there is a lot to be improved before posting the
> formal patch series.  Gut feeling is that maybe it's a bit too difficult
> for you to get the drivers right.  As I said earlier, my original plan is to
> add i.MX8QXP prefetch engine support first with the posted patch series and
> then to add i.MX95 display controller support, but maybe I can try to add the
> latter first - just need to find a time slot.  However, adding prefetch engine
> support first would directly show a reason to people why two DRM drivers are
> warranted when adding i.MX95 display controller support.

I haven't seen any MX95 DPU patches posted (except for my work from last 
year), was there any progress since this discussion ?