public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@kernel.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Sebastian Andrzej Siewior" <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
	"Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
	"David Laight" <david.laight.linux@gmail.com>,
	"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
	"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
	"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	"Jisheng Zhang" <jszhang@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64/runtime-const: Use aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() for patching
Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2026 01:24:45 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c45ede13-f8d0-4b6a-b2ed-f06af4882ebc@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <adjE6WzFM7NogzlU@arm.com>

Hello Catalin,

Thank you for taking a look at the series and pointing to the Shashiko
review.

On 4/10/2026 3:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> -static inline void __runtime_fixup_caches(void *where, unsigned int insns)
>> -{
>> -     unsigned long va = (unsigned long)where;
>> -     caches_clean_inval_pou(va, va + 4*insns);
>> +     aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(p, insn);
>>  }
> 
> Sashiko has some good points here:

Ack! I did check the Sashiko review a few days after posting. I think
I'll probably start replying to Shahsiko's inline review on future
threads on LKML to keep the record like some folks are doing.

> 
> https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260402112250.2138-1-kprateek.nayak@amd.com
> 
> In short, aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() does not expect a linear map
> address but rather a kernel text one (or vmalloc/modules). The other
> valid point is on aliasing I-caches.
> 
> I think dropping the lm_alias() and just use 'where' directly would do
> but I haven't tried.

Ack! I completely missed that subtlety of passing "where" to
caches_clean_inval_pou(). I'm still surprised that it didn't
blow up in my testing.

Anyhow, following diff, on top of the full series builds and
tests fine and has been blessed by review-prompts:

diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h
index 21f817eb5951..d3f0dfa7ced0 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/runtime-const.h
@@ -57,21 +57,21 @@
 } while (0)
 
 /* 16-bit immediate for wide move (movz and movk) in bits 5..20 */
-static inline void __runtime_fixup_16(__le32 *p, unsigned int val)
+static inline void __runtime_fixup_16(void *where, unsigned int val)
 {
+	__le32 *p = lm_alias(where);
 	u32 insn = le32_to_cpu(*p);
 	insn &= 0xffe0001f;
 	insn |= (val & 0xffff) << 5;
-	aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(p, insn);
+	aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(where, insn);
 }
 
 static inline void __runtime_fixup_ptr(void *where, unsigned long val)
 {
-	__le32 *p = lm_alias(where);
-	__runtime_fixup_16(p, val);
-	__runtime_fixup_16(p+1, val >> 16);
-	__runtime_fixup_16(p+2, val >> 32);
-	__runtime_fixup_16(p+3, val >> 48);
+	__runtime_fixup_16(where, val);
+	__runtime_fixup_16(where + 4, val >> 16);
+	__runtime_fixup_16(where + 8, val >> 32);
+	__runtime_fixup_16(where + 12, val >> 48);
 }
 
 /* Immediate value is 6 bits starting at bit #16 */
@@ -81,15 +81,14 @@ static inline void __runtime_fixup_shift(void *where, unsigned long val)
 	u32 insn = le32_to_cpu(*p);
 	insn &= 0xffc0ffff;
 	insn |= (val & 63) << 16;
-	aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(p, insn);
+	aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync(where, insn);
 }
 
 /* Immediate value is 6 bits starting at bit #16 */
 static inline void __runtime_fixup_mask(void *where, unsigned long val)
 {
-	__le32 *p = lm_alias(where);
-	__runtime_fixup_16(p, val);
-	__runtime_fixup_16(p+1, val >> 16);
+	__runtime_fixup_16(where, val);
+	__runtime_fixup_16(where + 4, val >> 16);
 }
 
 static inline void runtime_const_fixup(void (*fn)(void *, unsigned long),
---

I'll do some more sanity checks and address the rest of the comments
before posting out v4 soon after the merge window. Thank you again
for your feedback. Much appreciated.

-- 
Thanks and Regards,
Prateek



  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-11 19:55 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-02 11:22 [PATCH v3 0/7] futex: Use runtime constants for futex_hash computation K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 1/7] x86/runtime-const: Introduce runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 2/7] arm64/runtime-const: Use aarch64_insn_patch_text_nosync() for patching K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-10  9:37   ` Catalin Marinas
2026-04-11 19:54     ` K Prateek Nayak [this message]
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 3/7] arm64/runtime-const: Introduce runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 4/7] riscv/runtime-const: " K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-03  9:42   ` Guo Ren
2026-04-03 10:35     ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 5/7] s390/runtime-const: " K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 6/7] asm-generic/runtime-const: Add dummy runtime_const_mask_32() K Prateek Nayak
2026-04-02 11:22 ` [PATCH v3 7/7] futex: Use runtime constants for __futex_hash() hot path K Prateek Nayak

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c45ede13-f8d0-4b6a-b2ed-f06af4882ebc@amd.com \
    --to=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
    --cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
    --cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
    --cc=david.laight.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
    --cc=jszhang@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox