From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AD3CAC433F5 for ; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 22:01:50 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=lPls0gTaO3wEq+K3akuwtuvtnvmigCMObVxgxmV/Kq0=; b=CrZkgB++oSK4dt BOzzBkUZ/Oal3X5RMBC/65cDI6UbN2USOP4epb4ppyaOFnzi/1CNKgp2LvIUA/P4BX2MGbm72CVUo 9SpGTILt665K4WhAMdLDvm+WNcPaGyKPVup/De1D29iNw7cbTHn/R9l67Urk7/EjDyD6tNZi5MVhY ZfrE/3T83izGytudjanBE3TPGYIY82pOP8oQoVhqyeDcG680peMSGygw34pxVVHw6pgvVlmo7rYDV sPzrxFZmvx2W3Tw6aTNWUz1lKz7/zjSVIusPw+igJuJ1xVRkYwXlKlQFUvHel8vEe1YzmyZJbXkuK lynL7jdwPTKFoLmW///Q==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nRhsp-006OCa-5z; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 22:00:43 +0000 Received: from linux.microsoft.com ([13.77.154.182]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nRhsl-006OBM-8E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 08 Mar 2022 22:00:40 +0000 Received: from [192.168.254.32] (unknown [47.189.24.195]) by linux.microsoft.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5F17C20B7178; Tue, 8 Mar 2022 14:00:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 linux.microsoft.com 5F17C20B7178 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.microsoft.com; s=default; t=1646776837; bh=6aGA5zF6jU5zH7UbdaZnmMkVSuozYHUjOEcPB4bdYIM=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=svryphXe56GxH3wIuzgftWULHzQSof0sq6j9xgRGizLEfetBH1iw9N8TcDC+1q8H4 nosAMecuDL0jjxqe/Pg4Yp9855PAje7MevjtTI/7/wuk0sYLH16KSld6/LlEGQSfOU u/gWY8CGNOdLUg8ciaTqx87ftEXwodHcasEH9rEk= Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:00:35 -0600 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.5.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 06/11] arm64: Use stack_trace_consume_fn and rename args to unwind() Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Brown Cc: Mark Rutland , jpoimboe@redhat.com, ardb@kernel.org, nobuta.keiya@fujitsu.com, sjitindarsingh@gmail.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, jmorris@namei.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, live-patching@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <95691cae4f4504f33d0fc9075541b1e7deefe96f> <20220117145608.6781-1-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <20220117145608.6781-7-madvenka@linux.microsoft.com> <845e4589-97d9-5371-3a0e-f6e05919f32d@linux.microsoft.com> From: "Madhavan T. Venkataraman" In-Reply-To: X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220308_140039_359512_777E9259 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 14.72 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 3/7/22 11:01, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:51:38AM -0600, Madhavan T. Venkataraman wrote: >> Hey Mark Rutland, Mark Brown, >> >> Could you please review the rest of the patches in the series when you can? >> > > Please don't send content free pings. As far as I remember I'd reviewed > or was expecting changes based on review or dependent patches for > everything that you'd sent. > Indeed you did! Many thanks! It is just that patch 11 that defines "select HAVE_RELIABLE_STACKTRACE" did not receive any comments from you (unless I missed a comment that came from you. That is entirely possible. If I missed it, my bad). Since you suggested that change, I just wanted to make sure that that patch looks OK to you. >> Also, many of the patches have received a Reviewed-By from you both. So, after I send the next version out, can we upstream those ones? > > That's more a question for Catalin and Will. If myself and Mark have > reviewed patches then we're saying we think those patches are good to > go. Got it! Thanks! Madhavan _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel