From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: sricharan@codeaurora.org (Sricharan R) Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 09:39:03 +0530 Subject: [PATCH V12 00/14] Krait clocks + Krait CPUfreq In-Reply-To: <153980741313.5275.10376918222904341760@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> References: <1534248753-2440-1-git-send-email-sricharan@codeaurora.org> <2ae96741-94c0-ba4c-fc19-05d33179683c@codeaurora.org> <153979105280.5275.841088095583550635@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> <153980741313.5275.10376918222904341760@swboyd.mtv.corp.google.com> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Stephen, On 10/18/2018 1:46 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Stephen Boyd (2018-10-17 08:44:12) >> Quoting Sricharan R (2018-09-20 06:03:31) >>> >>> >>> On 9/20/2018 1:54 AM, Craig wrote: >>>> Yup, this patch seems to have fixed the higher frequencies from the quick test I did. >>>> >>> Thanks !!. Can i take that as >>> Tested-by: Craig Tatlor ? >>> >> >> Is this patch series going to be resent? >> > > Nevermind. Looking at it I think I can apply all the clk ones and we're > good to go. If you can send a followup patch series to change the > registration and provider APIs to be clk_hw instead of clk based I would > appreciate it. > Sorry for the late response. Was away. Only pending thing was separating out the binding documentation for the cpu-freq driver and fixing the text in documentation. That means, yes its fine to merge the clk ones as you said. I will resend that. Also, will send a follow up series for clk_hw to clk change as you mentioned separately. Regards, Sricharan -- "QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation