From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: rnayak@codeaurora.org (Rajendra Nayak) Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2018 14:59:55 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v2 9/9] PM / Domains: Add dev_pm_domain_attach_by_id() to manage multi PM domains In-Reply-To: References: <20180529100421.31022-1-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> <20180529100421.31022-10-ulf.hansson@linaro.org> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On 06/27/2018 02:35 PM, Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 27 June 2018 at 10:55, Rajendra Nayak wrote: >> >> >> On 05/30/2018 08:00 PM, Jon Hunter wrote: >>>>> My only other comments on this series are ... >>>>> >>>>> 1. I think it would be nice to have an dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() and >>>>> that the DT binding has a 'power-domain-names' property. >>>> I think it makes sense, but my plan was to do that as second step on >>>> top. Are you okay with that as well? >>> Yes that is fine with me. >> >> Ulf, do you have a patch for this? I am working on moving some of qcom >> remoteproc drivers to use this series and it will help to have a >> dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name() api. > > Right. Besides this I have been working on a little improvement, > avoiding to power the PM domain while attaching. > > I post a series in a day or two. great, thank you. > > Kind regards > Uffe > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > -- Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation