From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0619FCA0EFB for ; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:15:04 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc :References:In-Reply-To:Subject:To:From:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:MIME-Version :Content-Type:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=j1RSaqSBfdEgRZZK4r1EKSpaMqq1K5TQ7okIVP5zzlw=; b=Ki8XJBkOEOHHHg+2F7ZG1GOGOQ KR3vHzztRqARHQWNZfycvOOPT5ongeBv+UEXYNJ/iwevrXtUNbWSj06WDe8sJFEY84D7wr+gfC1OX YH5Je5Si3bpPGeeR5fDo6jI6T4aFF4khHiVgOe8VPcLcBZWvatlv1RgefRHzQPz4Wjb+3InMo9sut aKrCacxF7xUSiLAXizkYaMKSl6xrC/qsk4PHtXf7KJ+5ETrUmil6BQs1FgRC4j02A1GdIWibWxeRG 3o+8wxvlfcFMGb8eJsItsk0C/TXK7hnpUeX0uMhQ3EQ4y3JeFU1J+7jxOXz2AK7Tn65YvPWv+YIpC A3OAkjbA==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uoQrK-0000000BEVa-1GYV; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 18:14:58 +0000 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org ([2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uoMqm-0000000AgBx-0QHI for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:09 +0000 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (transwarp.subspace.kernel.org [100.75.92.58]) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AFEF5C5B63; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3D65BC4CEF1; Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:06 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755611886; bh=j1RSaqSBfdEgRZZK4r1EKSpaMqq1K5TQ7okIVP5zzlw=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Cc:From; b=NxwatY5crFE7fECYQEVBOyoOpjfP5/45PpoptNh0DX5HMNjlR78x6TXhATmaA+bzq 4Lujs3/Xpx8qVH+EW3iLIDPQfcsLZ5zwfeCgcNaZ7JxiF2qHhJRpXuv3KWeTi0mq6y UEz1EdD23lMfhpqmWrGRowMgtXIy4WnBZx/T0fDjfN1QpgM8fB0DLO8P8mLFH3p7hf 7e8GGuZrDnh8Ps4HHjfe45pI6M4e46Yt8Y7aBMqv+b0744Y+fESCvh32S/ZbKareoS 7BwF3oZAKOWHUNzMZRniG87VfOZfezS5oxkraL1dSiP2NNpYYgtHgn7kWBbw2iHH9g in2WzE4R2PUIQ== Message-ID: Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2025 13:58:04 +0000 From: "Maxime Ripard" To: "Luca Ceresoli" Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/9] drm/omapdrm: use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() In-Reply-To: <20250801-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v2-4-888912b0be13@bootlin.com> References: <20250801-drm-bridge-alloc-getput-drm_bridge_get_next_bridge-v2-4-888912b0be13@bootlin.com> Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, "Andrzej Hajda" , "David Airlie" , "Fabio Estevam" , "Hui Pu" , "Jernej Skrabec" , "Jonas Karlman" , "Laurent Pinchart" , "Liu Ying" , "Maarten Lankhorst" , "Maxime Ripard" , "Neil Armstrong" , "Pengutronix Kernel Team" , "Philipp Zabel" , "Robert Foss" , "Sascha Hauer" , "Shawn Guo" , "Simona Vetter" , "Thomas Petazzoni" , "Thomas Zimmermann" , "Tomi Valkeinen" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250819_065808_176098_ECB4D990 X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 7.42 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Fri, 1 Aug 2025 19:05:26 +0200, Luca Ceresoli wrote: > Use drm_bridge_chain_get_last_bridge() instead of open coding a loop with > two invocations of drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() per iteration. >=20 > Besides being cleaner and more efficient, this change is necessary in > preparation for drm_bridge_get_next_bridge() to get a reference to the >=20 > [ ... ] Reviewed-by: Maxime Ripard Thanks! Maxime