From: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
To: "coresight@lists.linaro.org" <coresight@lists.linaro.org>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Mike Leach <mike.leach@arm.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@linux.dev>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
Leo Yan <leo.yan@arm.com>, Suyash Mahar <smahar@meta.com>,
Amir Ayupov <aaupov@fb.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6/6] coresight: perf: Retry failed HW_ID writes
Date: Fri, 21 Aug 2026 11:01:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c7c42471-d537-4196-b78d-9c9aa6c87570@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260821-james-cs-hw_id-output-failure-v1-6-9d532ddabcc3@linaro.org>
On 21/08/2026 10:50, James Clark wrote:
> Don't set the aux_hwid_done bit when writes fail so that it can be
> retried later if the ring buffer was full.
>
> Add a second attempt on stop in case this session only has one call
> to start. Otherwise there is no chance to retry and it isn't fixed by
> not setting aux_hwid_done.
>
> Signed-off-by: James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>
> ---
> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c | 52 +++++++++++++++---------
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> index 09b21a711a87..0ffc5cd9c88f 100644
> --- a/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> +++ b/drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm-perf.c
> @@ -536,6 +536,31 @@ static int etm_event_resume(struct coresight_path *path)
> return ret;
> }
>
> +static void etm_output_hw_id(struct perf_event *event,
> + struct etm_event_data *event_data,
> + struct coresight_path *path,
> + struct coresight_device *sink)
> +{
> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> + u64 hw_id;
> +
> + /*
> + * output cpu / trace ID in perf record, once for the lifetime
> + * of the event.
> + */
> + if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &event_data->aux_hwid_done)) {
> + hw_id = FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_MAJOR_VERSION_MASK,
> + CS_AUX_HW_ID_MAJOR_VERSION);
> + hw_id |= FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_MINOR_VERSION_MASK,
> + CS_AUX_HW_ID_MINOR_VERSION);
> + hw_id |= FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_TRACE_ID_MASK, path->trace_id);
> + hw_id |= FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_SINK_ID_MASK, coresight_get_sink_id(sink));
> +
> + if (!perf_report_aux_output_id(event, hw_id))
> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &event_data->aux_hwid_done);
> + }
> +}
> +
> static void etm_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> {
> int cpu = smp_processor_id();
> @@ -544,7 +569,6 @@ static void etm_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> struct perf_output_handle *handle = &ctxt->handle;
> struct coresight_device *source, *sink;
> struct coresight_path *path;
> - u64 hw_id;
>
> if (flags & PERF_EF_RESUME) {
> path = etm_event_get_ctxt_path(ctxt);
> @@ -596,22 +620,7 @@ static void etm_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> if (coresight_enable_source(source, event, CS_MODE_PERF, path))
> goto fail_disable_path;
>
> - /*
> - * output cpu / trace ID in perf record, once for the lifetime
> - * of the event.
> - */
> - if (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpu, &event_data->aux_hwid_done)) {
> - cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &event_data->aux_hwid_done);
> -
> - hw_id = FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_MAJOR_VERSION_MASK,
> - CS_AUX_HW_ID_MAJOR_VERSION);
> - hw_id |= FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_MINOR_VERSION_MASK,
> - CS_AUX_HW_ID_MINOR_VERSION);
> - hw_id |= FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_TRACE_ID_MASK, path->trace_id);
> - hw_id |= FIELD_PREP(CS_AUX_HW_ID_SINK_ID_MASK, coresight_get_sink_id(sink));
> -
> - perf_report_aux_output_id(event, hw_id);
> - }
> + etm_output_hw_id(event, event_data, path, sink);
>
> out:
> /* Tell the perf core the event is alive */
> @@ -630,7 +639,7 @@ static void etm_event_start(struct perf_event *event, int flags)
> */
> if (READ_ONCE(handle->event)) {
> perf_aux_output_flag(handle, PERF_AUX_FLAG_TRUNCATED);
> - perf_aux_output_end(handle, 0);
> + perf_aux_output_end(path->handle, 0);
Accidentally left this in from hacking. It doesn't do anything so I'll
remove it.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-21 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-21 9:50 [PATCH 0/6] perf: cs-etm: HW_ID improvements James Clark
2026-08-21 9:50 ` [PATCH 1/6] perf: cs-etm: Don't add global v0 HW_IDs to unformatted queues James Clark
2026-08-21 9:50 ` [PATCH 2/6] perf cs-etm: Free partially created queues James Clark
2026-08-21 9:50 ` [PATCH 3/6] perf cs-etm: Synthesize missing HW_ID mappings for raw trace James Clark
2026-08-21 9:50 ` [PATCH 4/6] perf: cs-etm: Respect --no-itrace option James Clark
2026-08-24 9:53 ` Adrian Hunter
2026-08-21 9:50 ` [PATCH 5/6] perf/core: Return errors from perf_report_aux_output_id() James Clark
2026-08-21 9:50 ` [PATCH 6/6] coresight: perf: Retry failed HW_ID writes James Clark
2026-08-21 10:01 ` James Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c7c42471-d537-4196-b78d-9c9aa6c87570@linaro.org \
--to=james.clark@linaro.org \
--cc=aaupov@fb.com \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=acme@redhat.com \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=leo.yan@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mike.leach@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=smahar@meta.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox