From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A19B5C4363C for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 04:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Received: from merlin.infradead.org (merlin.infradead.org [205.233.59.134]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 52B47206DD for ; Sun, 4 Oct 2020 04:21:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="S6rM8sQw"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="HZqlR/YP" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 52B47206DD Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=perches.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=merlin.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:References:In-Reply-To:Date:To:From: Subject:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=hQrOCHQLc8GIU7v8g4OsJ3HK8Qcw6IXuKQ+LQsxJoc0=; b=S6rM8sQwXYAeVAVaLNVM71q2X VtD8HNdiy1Aqi+XqPNn+r5b2zvQ5kKmwiH0k5H1WRhiF5l/kTtBvxjDjpp5ypxn9QQhVP8DmkkGpM Jo/oheuyLpDUKibjj77mswCw4SjKNdi6bcJAEgx94B3rQPo+YEs3ggboj4Qwp+jRcO2iV69xBEMyE mWrMdQ/ufhK0FvUawUlGAW1PYjIyoVrkmOtE47uoMdU/r7A7YIyPrl5h+TNnmzr6uujqhlrdnu6hu QT0Gs90hv7WL6Q4vIyd0Z6BVpBmRfFNDEhJZnM82xsJZrSL1k7KuhaNmTyy0UgeI0J9il2N8kktde 3gFRwZgBQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=merlin.infradead.org) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOvVd-0000Lg-C2; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 04:20:29 +0000 Received: from casper.infradead.org ([2001:8b0:10b:1236::1]) by merlin.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOvVa-0000Kj-Un; Sun, 04 Oct 2020 04:20:26 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:MIME-Version: Content-Type:References:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:To:From:Subject:Message-ID:Sender :Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=fvbqGCVEpVDhVRg/xUlRvVYkBg6uEL6hdcITKuytgKc=; b=HZqlR/YPSIQY5xfaXj2gWz/6ra gGwjqEykquJJ+3GyUE9e6uojJVOhE+8+bk+WfF8GaLVlngCRquORIW+WMc2qyZOhP+uEj9jhFauhQ x1x6Ct+gNuDUUJdEldJcPcmzvzl1wKRmypkw0dtyStvWnw77l7msdE/gE26mlpXDLx+LbXPtsE3ua Gj6c0SY24gnGSUJ6w3WWu6dUTXmt1cGc4z5jYKg8Fh3jonfBy39B4HZ0BdoXaIdeTUeByMPDH/w7o WXYwE8J7H+R96H8k2u8vCIgj2ut7XUToemPPqWxn9DOsShBDfnat5soaX+Ax0mbObwbxWsPt/ymfm XBqzf6qg==; Received: from smtprelay0027.hostedemail.com ([216.40.44.27] helo=smtprelay.hostedemail.com) by casper.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1kOnBa-0002Rm-Rg; Sat, 03 Oct 2020 19:27:18 +0000 Received: from filter.hostedemail.com (clb03-v110.bra.tucows.net [216.40.38.60]) by smtprelay07.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F8B181D330D; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:27:08 +0000 (UTC) X-Session-Marker: 6A6F6540706572636865732E636F6D X-HE-Tag: bell15_5909bf3271af X-Filterd-Recvd-Size: 2863 Received: from XPS-9350.home (unknown [47.151.133.149]) (Authenticated sender: joe@perches.com) by omf01.hostedemail.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Sat, 3 Oct 2020 19:27:04 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/18] use semicolons rather than commas to separate statements From: Joe Perches To: Konstantin Ryabitsev Date: Sat, 03 Oct 2020 12:27:03 -0700 In-Reply-To: <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> References: <1601233948-11629-1-git-send-email-Julia.Lawall@inria.fr> <160132172369.55460.9237357219623604216.b4-ty@kernel.org> <20200929113745.GB4799@sirena.org.uk> <20201001110150.GA6715@sirena.org.uk> <20201003191501.o56tqq63d2buq5ox@chatter.i7.local> User-Agent: Evolution 3.36.4-0ubuntu1 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20201003_202715_447791_B88DA086 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 17.93 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, drbd-dev@lists.linbit.com, Neil Armstrong , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, Jerome Brunet , David Lechner , Martin Blumenstingl , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Mark Brown , linux-amlogic@lists.infradead.org, Thomas Gleixner , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, Valdis =?UTF-8?Q?Kl=C4=93tnieks?= , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Julia Lawall , linux-crypto@vger.kernel.org, openipmi-developer@lists.sourceforge.net, tools@linux.kernel.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On Sat, 2020-10-03 at 15:15 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote: > On Sat, Oct 03, 2020 at 11:40:48AM -0700, Joe Perches wrote: > > (Adding tools and Konstantin Ryabitsev) > > > > There seems to be some mismatch between b4's use of the > > cover letter to a patch series and what maintainers that > > apply a subset of the patches in the patch series. > > > > The merge description shows the entire patch series as > > applied, but the actual merge is only a subset of the > > series. > > > > Can this be improved in b4? > > So, the following logic should be applied: > > - if the entire series was applied, reply to 0/n > - if a subset only is applied, reply to each n/n of the patch that was > cherry-picked out of the series > > Is that an accurate summary? Exactly so, thanks. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel