public inbox for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: andre.przywara@arm.com (Andre Przywara)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 2/5] arm64: only select PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner platforms
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 18:19:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c878ba53-a33a-e042-2d65-11f86a47b844@arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170228172444.59655-2-icenowy@aosc.xyz>

Hi,

On 28/02/17 17:24, Icenowy Zheng wrote:
> As the pinctrl driver selecting is refactored in Kconfig file of
> pinctrl-sunxi, now we can select only PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner
> platform, and the default value of several pinctrl drivers useful on
> ARM64 Allwinner SoCs will become Y.
> 
> Drop the select of per-SoC pinctrl choices, but select PINCTRL_SUNXI.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Icenowy Zheng <icenowy@aosc.xyz>
> ---
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> index 129cc5ae4091..f6db2a938b1e 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig.platforms
> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ config ARCH_SUNXI
>  	bool "Allwinner sunxi 64-bit SoC Family"
>  	select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP
>  	select PINCTRL
> -	select PINCTRL_SUN50I_A64
> +	select PINCTRL_SUNXI

Why do we need to add this generic PINCTRL_SUNXI here? This is selected
already by the SoC specific PINCTRL symbols (see your previous patch).

Cheers,
Andre.

>  	help
>  	  This enables support for Allwinner sunxi based SoCs like the A64.
>  
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-28 18:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-28 17:24 [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: sunxi: refactor pinctrl choice selecting for ARM64 Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] arm64: only select PINCTRL_SUNXI for Allwinner platforms Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 18:19   ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2017-02-28 18:57     ` [linux-sunxi] " Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] dt-bindings: fix for Allwinner H5 pinctrl's compatible Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] dt: bindings: add binding for Allwinner A64 R_PIO pinctrl Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 17:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] pinctrl: sunxi: Add A64 R_PIO controller support Icenowy Zheng
2017-02-28 18:29   ` [linux-sunxi] " Andre Przywara
2017-02-28 18:58     ` Icenowy Zheng
2017-03-01  2:34     ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2017-02-28 18:17 ` [linux-sunxi] [PATCH 1/5] pinctrl: sunxi: refactor pinctrl choice selecting for ARM64 Andre Przywara
2017-02-28 18:55   ` Icenowy Zheng
2017-03-01  2:38     ` Chen-Yu Tsai

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c878ba53-a33a-e042-2d65-11f86a47b844@arm.com \
    --to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox