From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7A142C3ABB6 for ; Mon, 5 May 2025 10:11:14 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender:List-Subscribe:List-Help :List-Post:List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To:Subject:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From: Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=BmTwP3C/5RRHNa0cESV330FAgf6OjrxM/JkWPUJkdr4=; b=W9u474DxYsYRgkPpAalF/qv1qN UvnQSVs3dcLB90x4RlFvjl6fFVGR3l9meeOqgDSO7NBywDUT63fjyJ8lRu/1pJBK8dL60EW9v74Yw okpEsRm+Kp9qFzwZBiiYCV1K9xtN+tLT2btJbpKVghaVI9KvWWKV9jKp1hLe8KVRbKJ+fXnXSBBlO hiwedvIF2wNodYIcOuoyirnkd3UH/DlcFLXZrOArggEuguPv+J4+ciAWbymeNdP802hYAvp8hndqQ ulGjmyEi4rQx753aaWLuHWTElMXDbCtHZmbAVteF070Xdbu1gx9S/vk0oL2LQuTC01YbzjZ+WQ0K5 qNJWCMWQ==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uBsmu-000000071jS-2jz5; Mon, 05 May 2025 10:11:04 +0000 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([170.10.133.124]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1uBsku-000000071In-2waC for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 05 May 2025 10:09:01 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1746439739; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:autocrypt:autocrypt; bh=BmTwP3C/5RRHNa0cESV330FAgf6OjrxM/JkWPUJkdr4=; b=ijC8Cqhb9owexcj8Ls/ioT2HGqT5u3EyYh1DokUuROFfWzzuAVi39BWv8BM4rOOiGPmUl+ tQOL/Wp2aLlm24iRdUD3ds2ar4PIXlW7423JsZrehAV+5ElJmHmCaQfKbYuekQpjpgsHOc 1vcHAJt6fjySPfW7xXl09Z9ox7UaGTA= Received: from mail-wm1-f72.google.com (mail-wm1-f72.google.com [209.85.128.72]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.3, cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-606-Tb7-hN-SOZ6l93Bez_vCiQ-1; Mon, 05 May 2025 06:08:58 -0400 X-MC-Unique: Tb7-hN-SOZ6l93Bez_vCiQ-1 X-Mimecast-MFC-AGG-ID: Tb7-hN-SOZ6l93Bez_vCiQ_1746439737 Received: by mail-wm1-f72.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-440667e7f92so24790085e9.3 for ; Mon, 05 May 2025 03:08:57 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1746439737; x=1747044537; h=content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:organization:autocrypt :content-language:from:references:cc:to:subject:user-agent :mime-version:date:message-id:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=BmTwP3C/5RRHNa0cESV330FAgf6OjrxM/JkWPUJkdr4=; b=tKgeQ2KJcFjQjR602AiSfw8R3fmHeS8EoXuNPyOHTqXFDzmyA++EHPYahvyw8aQA1r eB9WrSztIae0Ox06gg+A618hF1/eFdI74s/pj8BTVXE/fZCa+5vK5CXf7SmQRxEIl9iu IIDPXjRyJBkItUg/6cVHP/DHQuqgwY+HqUcEXLAJdKPSEe1BlUqv6fVohgUsL3EKSsVU cp0d4w/Pm7VSuLKD3I/v7UPcWAXsTvQlWBiCXf+8POYuS/IBsiWuCc+1YsbQanoL9oOH bYHedbVzd/ntMv9ADIsff6dPiDcpOmUm0SWOx/k8znuycGNayJehQBbr3525eimEEa80 xmXw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxDgggqM2gOKEICoqzq5fHjG6XspsxzFcBZvK9Cxw2tFm7LplvX csvCrjDp9njApK3jBzpWhCTFjZ63meMh7a/IEzDQxoKpeXAXDep4GAlbJVu6RR3eLVp/6aHTWY1 poElgXxqwcKwkSlJZpQxG6DU+7dLT+qnalSXFTV7euvbsNwqMCK2HFjkRm+bV/d9E/GBL32uQ X-Gm-Gg: ASbGncv9YEzxEvyJOsmrDx3M3tc/Qkf6YMtJeVuM03JptSGJz+sLCNHMXPrTA+1owgv 7OpKS1J10IGrv9EUcfOtp6iLQ/mS0JM/7TF50g1CBXlt7Pfvu+t7xvWLbpqKkx4rX64UjXfCTr3 TEjN80wmGoEn7pp2oW7p5p5Bisqi13jRqGRRuLO+04I84D1huO7rYauv/Lu5nw8VE1l46J4FZ5f RAL8M/TUfxLvSmePXGgxfjWLtpibtvGX6OUVGFd3PnczL0nRnC9Q712wl6SVZOJzWWrgkR83L1r paigm5i7P8BaHyqOY/eGG2cBT9ZUyf/BjSBjWAlreVzTsQnq63LSb9UaoCbsDAnMpBs3rFNybOn 5IqPjjWfAI2w26LYd4QMtVByWspio1Jm/QG912TU= X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a13:b0:43c:f81d:f with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-441c48bca3bmr57375785e9.8.1746439736741; Mon, 05 May 2025 03:08:56 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGPx432VgCohrDR6C5RgxgqMkrU5XckKpboeqJ5naVLmUoTk99ORY1qD6XhEz6hLJ5dyJF7Ng== X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:a13:b0:43c:f81d:f with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-441c48bca3bmr57375515e9.8.1746439736336; Mon, 05 May 2025 03:08:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?IPV6:2003:cb:c73d:2400:3be1:a856:724c:fd29? (p200300cbc73d24003be1a856724cfd29.dip0.t-ipconnect.de. [2003:cb:c73d:2400:3be1:a856:724c:fd29]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-441c0dfc537sm82386455e9.16.2025.05.05.03.08.55 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 05 May 2025 03:08:55 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 May 2025 12:08:54 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v4 4/5] mm/readahead: Store folio order in struct file_ra_state To: Ryan Roberts , Andrew Morton , "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Alexander Viro , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Dave Chinner , Catalin Marinas , Will Deacon , Kalesh Singh , Zi Yan Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org References: <20250430145920.3748738-1-ryan.roberts@arm.com> <20250430145920.3748738-5-ryan.roberts@arm.com> From: David Hildenbrand Autocrypt: addr=david@redhat.com; keydata= xsFNBFXLn5EBEAC+zYvAFJxCBY9Tr1xZgcESmxVNI/0ffzE/ZQOiHJl6mGkmA1R7/uUpiCjJ dBrn+lhhOYjjNefFQou6478faXE6o2AhmebqT4KiQoUQFV4R7y1KMEKoSyy8hQaK1umALTdL QZLQMzNE74ap+GDK0wnacPQFpcG1AE9RMq3aeErY5tujekBS32jfC/7AnH7I0v1v1TbbK3Gp XNeiN4QroO+5qaSr0ID2sz5jtBLRb15RMre27E1ImpaIv2Jw8NJgW0k/D1RyKCwaTsgRdwuK Kx/Y91XuSBdz0uOyU/S8kM1+ag0wvsGlpBVxRR/xw/E8M7TEwuCZQArqqTCmkG6HGcXFT0V9 PXFNNgV5jXMQRwU0O/ztJIQqsE5LsUomE//bLwzj9IVsaQpKDqW6TAPjcdBDPLHvriq7kGjt WhVhdl0qEYB8lkBEU7V2Yb+SYhmhpDrti9Fq1EsmhiHSkxJcGREoMK/63r9WLZYI3+4W2rAc UucZa4OT27U5ZISjNg3Ev0rxU5UH2/pT4wJCfxwocmqaRr6UYmrtZmND89X0KigoFD/XSeVv jwBRNjPAubK9/k5NoRrYqztM9W6sJqrH8+UWZ1Idd/DdmogJh0gNC0+N42Za9yBRURfIdKSb B3JfpUqcWwE7vUaYrHG1nw54pLUoPG6sAA7Mehl3nd4pZUALHwARAQABzSREYXZpZCBIaWxk ZW5icmFuZCA8ZGF2aWRAcmVkaGF0LmNvbT7CwZgEEwEIAEICGwMGCwkIBwMCBhUIAgkKCwQW AgMBAh4BAheAAhkBFiEEG9nKrXNcTDpGDfzKTd4Q9wD/g1oFAl8Ox4kFCRKpKXgACgkQTd4Q 9wD/g1oHcA//a6Tj7SBNjFNM1iNhWUo1lxAja0lpSodSnB2g4FCZ4R61SBR4l/psBL73xktp rDHrx4aSpwkRP6Epu6mLvhlfjmkRG4OynJ5HG1gfv7RJJfnUdUM1z5kdS8JBrOhMJS2c/gPf wv1TGRq2XdMPnfY2o0CxRqpcLkx4vBODvJGl2mQyJF/gPepdDfcT8/PY9BJ7FL6Hrq1gnAo4 3Iv9qV0JiT2wmZciNyYQhmA1V6dyTRiQ4YAc31zOo2IM+xisPzeSHgw3ONY/XhYvfZ9r7W1l pNQdc2G+o4Di9NPFHQQhDw3YTRR1opJaTlRDzxYxzU6ZnUUBghxt9cwUWTpfCktkMZiPSDGd KgQBjnweV2jw9UOTxjb4LXqDjmSNkjDdQUOU69jGMUXgihvo4zhYcMX8F5gWdRtMR7DzW/YE BgVcyxNkMIXoY1aYj6npHYiNQesQlqjU6azjbH70/SXKM5tNRplgW8TNprMDuntdvV9wNkFs 9TyM02V5aWxFfI42+aivc4KEw69SE9KXwC7FSf5wXzuTot97N9Phj/Z3+jx443jo2NR34XgF 89cct7wJMjOF7bBefo0fPPZQuIma0Zym71cP61OP/i11ahNye6HGKfxGCOcs5wW9kRQEk8P9 M/k2wt3mt/fCQnuP/mWutNPt95w9wSsUyATLmtNrwccz63XOwU0EVcufkQEQAOfX3n0g0fZz Bgm/S2zF/kxQKCEKP8ID+Vz8sy2GpDvveBq4H2Y34XWsT1zLJdvqPI4af4ZSMxuerWjXbVWb T6d4odQIG0fKx4F8NccDqbgHeZRNajXeeJ3R7gAzvWvQNLz4piHrO/B4tf8svmRBL0ZB5P5A 2uhdwLU3NZuK22zpNn4is87BPWF8HhY0L5fafgDMOqnf4guJVJPYNPhUFzXUbPqOKOkL8ojk CXxkOFHAbjstSK5Ca3fKquY3rdX3DNo+EL7FvAiw1mUtS+5GeYE+RMnDCsVFm/C7kY8c2d0G NWkB9pJM5+mnIoFNxy7YBcldYATVeOHoY4LyaUWNnAvFYWp08dHWfZo9WCiJMuTfgtH9tc75 7QanMVdPt6fDK8UUXIBLQ2TWr/sQKE9xtFuEmoQGlE1l6bGaDnnMLcYu+Asp3kDT0w4zYGsx 5r6XQVRH4+5N6eHZiaeYtFOujp5n+pjBaQK7wUUjDilPQ5QMzIuCL4YjVoylWiBNknvQWBXS lQCWmavOT9sttGQXdPCC5ynI+1ymZC1ORZKANLnRAb0NH/UCzcsstw2TAkFnMEbo9Zu9w7Kv AxBQXWeXhJI9XQssfrf4Gusdqx8nPEpfOqCtbbwJMATbHyqLt7/oz/5deGuwxgb65pWIzufa N7eop7uh+6bezi+rugUI+w6DABEBAAHCwXwEGAEIACYCGwwWIQQb2cqtc1xMOkYN/MpN3hD3 AP+DWgUCXw7HsgUJEqkpoQAKCRBN3hD3AP+DWrrpD/4qS3dyVRxDcDHIlmguXjC1Q5tZTwNB boaBTPHSy/Nksu0eY7x6HfQJ3xajVH32Ms6t1trDQmPx2iP5+7iDsb7OKAb5eOS8h+BEBDeq 3ecsQDv0fFJOA9ag5O3LLNk+3x3q7e0uo06XMaY7UHS341ozXUUI7wC7iKfoUTv03iO9El5f XpNMx/YrIMduZ2+nd9Di7o5+KIwlb2mAB9sTNHdMrXesX8eBL6T9b+MZJk+mZuPxKNVfEQMQ a5SxUEADIPQTPNvBewdeI80yeOCrN+Zzwy/Mrx9EPeu59Y5vSJOx/z6OUImD/GhX7Xvkt3kq Er5KTrJz3++B6SH9pum9PuoE/k+nntJkNMmQpR4MCBaV/J9gIOPGodDKnjdng+mXliF3Ptu6 3oxc2RCyGzTlxyMwuc2U5Q7KtUNTdDe8T0uE+9b8BLMVQDDfJjqY0VVqSUwImzTDLX9S4g/8 kC4HRcclk8hpyhY2jKGluZO0awwTIMgVEzmTyBphDg/Gx7dZU1Xf8HFuE+UZ5UDHDTnwgv7E th6RC9+WrhDNspZ9fJjKWRbveQgUFCpe1sa77LAw+XFrKmBHXp9ZVIe90RMe2tRL06BGiRZr jPrnvUsUUsjRoRNJjKKA/REq+sAnhkNPPZ/NNMjaZ5b8Tovi8C0tmxiCHaQYqj7G2rgnT0kt WNyWQQ== Organization: Red Hat In-Reply-To: <20250430145920.3748738-5-ryan.roberts@arm.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-MFC-PROC-ID: 18fWUXQ6WT3LFDD76E3amQXcDV35pzNVq9iykg_IGCY_1746439737 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Language: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20250505_030900_880955_AD8F2565 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 30.14 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 30.04.25 16:59, Ryan Roberts wrote: > Previously the folio order of the previous readahead request was > inferred from the folio who's readahead marker was hit. But due to the > way we have to round to non-natural boundaries sometimes, this first > folio in the readahead block is often smaller than the preferred order > for that request. This means that for cases where the initial sync > readahead is poorly aligned, the folio order will ramp up much more > slowly. > > So instead, let's store the order in struct file_ra_state so we are not > affected by any required alignment. We previously made enough room in > the struct for a 16 order field. This should be plenty big enough since > we are limited to MAX_PAGECACHE_ORDER anyway, which is certainly never > larger than ~20. > > Since we now pass order in struct file_ra_state, page_cache_ra_order() > no longer needs it's new_order parameter, so let's remove that. > > Worked example: > > Here we are touching pages 17-256 sequentially just as we did in the > previous commit, but now that we are remembering the preferred order > explicitly, we no longer have the slow ramp up problem. Note > specifically that we no longer have 2 rounds (2x ~128K) of order-2 > folios: > > TYPE STARTOFFS ENDOFFS SIZE STARTPG ENDPG NRPG ORDER RA > ----- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------- ------- ----- ----- -- > HOLE 0x00000000 0x00001000 4096 0 1 1 > FOLIO 0x00001000 0x00002000 4096 1 2 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00002000 0x00003000 4096 2 3 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00003000 0x00004000 4096 3 4 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00004000 0x00005000 4096 4 5 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00005000 0x00006000 4096 5 6 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00006000 0x00007000 4096 6 7 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00007000 0x00008000 4096 7 8 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00008000 0x00009000 4096 8 9 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00009000 0x0000a000 4096 9 10 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0000a000 0x0000b000 4096 10 11 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0000b000 0x0000c000 4096 11 12 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0000c000 0x0000d000 4096 12 13 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0000d000 0x0000e000 4096 13 14 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0000e000 0x0000f000 4096 14 15 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0000f000 0x00010000 4096 15 16 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00010000 0x00011000 4096 16 17 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00011000 0x00012000 4096 17 18 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00012000 0x00013000 4096 18 19 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00013000 0x00014000 4096 19 20 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00014000 0x00015000 4096 20 21 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00015000 0x00016000 4096 21 22 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00016000 0x00017000 4096 22 23 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00017000 0x00018000 4096 23 24 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00018000 0x00019000 4096 24 25 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00019000 0x0001a000 4096 25 26 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0001a000 0x0001b000 4096 26 27 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0001b000 0x0001c000 4096 27 28 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0001c000 0x0001d000 4096 28 29 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0001d000 0x0001e000 4096 29 30 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0001e000 0x0001f000 4096 30 31 1 0 > FOLIO 0x0001f000 0x00020000 4096 31 32 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00020000 0x00021000 4096 32 33 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00021000 0x00022000 4096 33 34 1 0 > FOLIO 0x00022000 0x00024000 8192 34 36 2 1 > FOLIO 0x00024000 0x00028000 16384 36 40 4 2 > FOLIO 0x00028000 0x0002c000 16384 40 44 4 2 > FOLIO 0x0002c000 0x00030000 16384 44 48 4 2 > FOLIO 0x00030000 0x00034000 16384 48 52 4 2 > FOLIO 0x00034000 0x00038000 16384 52 56 4 2 > FOLIO 0x00038000 0x0003c000 16384 56 60 4 2 > FOLIO 0x0003c000 0x00040000 16384 60 64 4 2 > FOLIO 0x00040000 0x00050000 65536 64 80 16 4 > FOLIO 0x00050000 0x00060000 65536 80 96 16 4 > FOLIO 0x00060000 0x00080000 131072 96 128 32 5 > FOLIO 0x00080000 0x000a0000 131072 128 160 32 5 > FOLIO 0x000a0000 0x000c0000 131072 160 192 32 5 > FOLIO 0x000c0000 0x000e0000 131072 192 224 32 5 > FOLIO 0x000e0000 0x00100000 131072 224 256 32 5 > FOLIO 0x00100000 0x00120000 131072 256 288 32 5 > FOLIO 0x00120000 0x00140000 131072 288 320 32 5 Y > HOLE 0x00140000 0x00800000 7077888 320 2048 1728 > > Signed-off-by: Ryan Roberts > --- > include/linux/fs.h | 2 ++ > mm/filemap.c | 6 ++++-- > mm/internal.h | 3 +-- > mm/readahead.c | 18 +++++++++++------- > 4 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h > index 44362bef0010..cde482a7270a 100644 > --- a/include/linux/fs.h > +++ b/include/linux/fs.h > @@ -1031,6 +1031,7 @@ struct fown_struct { > * and so were/are genuinely "ahead". Start next readahead when > * the first of these pages is accessed. > * @ra_pages: Maximum size of a readahead request, copied from the bdi. > + * @order: Preferred folio order used for most recent readahead. Looking at other members, and how it relates to the other members, should we call this something like "ra_prev_order" / "prev_ra_order" to distinguish it from !ra members and indicate the "most recent" semantics similar to "prev_pos"? Just a thought while digging through this patch ... ... > --- a/mm/filemap.c > +++ b/mm/filemap.c > @@ -3222,7 +3222,8 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf) > if (!(vm_flags & VM_RAND_READ)) > ra->size *= 2; > ra->async_size = HPAGE_PMD_NR; > - page_cache_ra_order(&ractl, ra, HPAGE_PMD_ORDER); > + ra->order = HPAGE_PMD_ORDER; > + page_cache_ra_order(&ractl, ra); > return fpin; > } > #endif > @@ -3258,8 +3259,9 @@ static struct file *do_sync_mmap_readahead(struct vm_fault *vmf) > ra->start = max_t(long, 0, vmf->pgoff - ra->ra_pages / 2); > ra->size = ra->ra_pages; > ra->async_size = ra->ra_pages / 4; > + ra->order = 0; > ractl._index = ra->start; > - page_cache_ra_order(&ractl, ra, 0); > + page_cache_ra_order(&ractl, ra); > return fpin; > } Why not let page_cache_ra_order() consume the order and update ra->order (or however it will be called :) ) internally? That might make at least the "most recent readahead" semantics of the variable clearer. Again, just a thought ... -- Cheers, David / dhildenb