linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: f.fainelli@gmail.com (Florian Fainelli)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH] ARM: smp: Remove CPU: shutdown notice
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2017 14:49:55 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <c91c2cc7-d516-2dec-ccd8-9b36b6644f24@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170118223948.GR27312@n2100.armlinux.org.uk>

On 01/18/2017 02:39 PM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2017 at 03:39:45PM -0800, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> Well, for one it's inconsistent, and it also leaves room for subtle
>> timing/caching issues with some platforms (OK, maybe not so much).
>> Improving the speed and consistency was the primary motive.
> 
> Actually, it's not as inconsistent as you claim.
> 
> c68b0274fb3c ("ARM: reduce "Booted secondary processor" message to debug level")
> dropped the corresponding pr_info() in the bringup path to debug level,
> so to be consistent, this one should be dropped to debug level too.
> 
> Removing it arguably makes it more inconsistent!

OK, fair point, I missed that one.

> 
> So, I'd be willing to accept a patch lowering this to a pr_debug()
> to make it more consistent with the bringup path, but otherwise the
> consistency argument doesn't really stand.

Sounds good, thanks!
-- 
Florian

  reply	other threads:[~2017-01-18 22:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-17 23:07 [PATCH] ARM: smp: Remove CPU: shutdown notice Florian Fainelli
2017-01-17 23:23 ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-17 23:39   ` Florian Fainelli
2017-01-18  9:55     ` Petr Mladek
2017-01-18 19:56       ` Florian Fainelli
2017-01-19 12:07         ` Sergey Senozhatsky
2017-01-18 22:39     ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-18 22:49       ` Florian Fainelli [this message]
2017-01-18 22:53 ` [PATCH] ARM: Reduce "CPU: shutdown" message to debug level Florian Fainelli
2017-01-18 23:20   ` Russell King - ARM Linux
2017-01-19  0:27     ` Florian Fainelli

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=c91c2cc7-d516-2dec-ccd8-9b36b6644f24@gmail.com \
    --to=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).