From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D607C433F5 for ; Wed, 18 May 2022 09:46:35 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20210309; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:From:References:Cc:To: Subject:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=vo8S+TNbX92IYdFdPhCoJvKUiYEkVAgal2sNfqW0NMg=; b=GLi4Za4XuMiR/S SE/n4RlnIuujyRGkj+yJtHbcMkBL/pU0yuqiyPMNSUd862CEHDMUrx428v4v7ahfg6NSchImMSu4b FwJk2ArwjK6d4GWveVDhg6jGX9mxwgfd0cBGFtUx2IHLdXmqeix21Wq60I0Pw2zzk2IvNUPgGLyKm LoB8Dmp5uJ4+EYqkmsc3VFglC1sGaJtfTa4IXKEJXIClZQpXYKTYE3iK3jPHd2JZcss1M3xar2T/Z HapK8smwFeV1a/HwLOpCjj3sEv9tLJr1SVoHby0N6acu0nbvVUs1SOaIPsgaCc/v9IwzJeiiALl9S AX5R5Q8twC29mDaV79wg==; Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nrGEv-00198R-Nj; Wed, 18 May 2022 09:45:11 +0000 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1nrGEo-00196A-Qq for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 18 May 2022 09:45:05 +0000 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 33AD61FB; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:45:01 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [10.57.4.200] (unknown [10.57.4.200]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 872E13F66F; Wed, 18 May 2022 02:44:58 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 18 May 2022 10:44:57 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.8.1 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] perf tools: arm64: Add support for VG register Content-Language: en-US To: Leo Yan Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org, acme@kernel.org, german.gomez@arm.com, mathieu.poirier@linaro.org, john.garry@huawei.com, Will Deacon , Mike Leach , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Mark Rutland , Alexander Shishkin , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org References: <20220517102005.3022017-1-james.clark@arm.com> <20220517102005.3022017-5-james.clark@arm.com> <20220517131952.GE153558@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> From: James Clark In-Reply-To: <20220517131952.GE153558@leoy-ThinkPad-X240s> X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20220518_024503_061586_446D698B X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 28.12 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 17/05/2022 14:19, Leo Yan wrote: > On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 11:20:05AM +0100, James Clark wrote: >> Add the name of the VG register so it can be used in --user-regs >> >> The event will fail to open if the register is requested but not >> available so only add it to the mask if the kernel supports sve and also >> if it supports that specific register. >> >> Signed-off-by: James Clark >> --- >> tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c | 2 ++ >> 2 files changed, 36 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c >> index 476b037eea1c..c0a921512a90 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/arch/arm64/util/perf_regs.c >> @@ -2,9 +2,11 @@ >> #include >> #include >> #include >> +#include >> #include >> #include >> >> +#include "../../../perf-sys.h" >> #include "../../../util/debug.h" >> #include "../../../util/event.h" >> #include "../../../util/perf_regs.h" >> @@ -43,6 +45,7 @@ const struct sample_reg sample_reg_masks[] = { >> SMPL_REG(lr, PERF_REG_ARM64_LR), >> SMPL_REG(sp, PERF_REG_ARM64_SP), >> SMPL_REG(pc, PERF_REG_ARM64_PC), >> + SMPL_REG(vg, PERF_REG_ARM64_VG), >> SMPL_REG_END >> }; >> >> @@ -131,3 +134,34 @@ int arch_sdt_arg_parse_op(char *old_op, char **new_op) >> >> return SDT_ARG_VALID; >> } >> + >> +uint64_t arch__user_reg_mask(void) >> +{ >> + struct perf_event_attr attr = { >> + .type = PERF_TYPE_HARDWARE, >> + .config = PERF_COUNT_HW_CPU_CYCLES, >> + .sample_type = PERF_SAMPLE_REGS_USER, >> + .disabled = 1, >> + .exclude_kernel = 1, >> + .sample_period = 1, >> + .sample_regs_user = PERF_REGS_MASK >> + }; >> + int fd; >> + >> + if (getauxval(AT_HWCAP) & HWCAP_SVE) >> + attr.sample_regs_user |= SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_VG); >> + >> + /* >> + * Check if the pmu supports perf extended regs, before >> + * returning the register mask to sample. >> + */ >> + if (attr.sample_regs_user != PERF_REGS_MASK) { >> + event_attr_init(&attr); >> + fd = sys_perf_event_open(&attr, 0, -1, -1, 0); >> + if (fd != -1) { >> + close(fd); >> + return attr.sample_regs_user; >> + } >> + } > > Just curious, since we can know SVE is supported from reading > auxiliary value, can we directly return the register mask as below? > > PERF_REGS_MASK | SMPL_REG_MASK(PERF_REG_ARM64_VG); I was trying to cover the case where the system supports SVE, but the kernel doesn't have my changes to add the VG register yet. Technically I could just attempt to open the event without checking for SVE first and see if it works or not. But I preferred to be explicit so it's obvious why we're doing that. James > > Except this question, this patch looks good to me. > > Thanks, > Leo > >> + return PERF_REGS_MASK; >> +} >> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c >> index a982e40ee5a9..872dd3d38782 100644 >> --- a/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c >> +++ b/tools/perf/util/perf_regs.c >> @@ -103,6 +103,8 @@ static const char *__perf_reg_name_arm64(int id) >> return "lr"; >> case PERF_REG_ARM64_PC: >> return "pc"; >> + case PERF_REG_ARM64_VG: >> + return "vg"; >> default: >> return NULL; >> } >> -- >> 2.28.0 >> _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel