Re: [PATCH] iommu: Improve the performance for direct_mapping

[Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>]

On 2020-11-20 09:06, Yong Wu wrote:
> Currently direct_mapping always use the smallest pgsize which is SZ_4K
> normally to mapping. This is unnecessary. we could gather the size, and
> call iommu_map then, iommu_map could decide how to map better with the
> just right pgsize.
> 
>  From the original comment, we should take care overlap, otherwise,
> iommu_map may return -EEXIST. In this overlap case, we should map the
> previous region before overlap firstly. then map the left part.
> 
> Each a iommu device will call this direct_mapping when its iommu
> initialize, This patch is effective to improve the boot/initialization
> time especially while it only needs level 1 mapping.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Anan Sun <anan.sun@mediatek.com>
> Signed-off-by: Yong Wu <yong.wu@mediatek.com>
> ---
>   drivers/iommu/iommu.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++--
>   1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> index df87c8e825f7..854a8fcb928d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu.c
> @@ -737,6 +737,7 @@ static int iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group,
>   	/* We need to consider overlapping regions for different devices */
>   	list_for_each_entry(entry, &mappings, list) {
>   		dma_addr_t start, end, addr;
> +		size_t unmapped_sz = 0;
>   
>   		if (domain->ops->apply_resv_region)
>   			domain->ops->apply_resv_region(dev, domain, entry);
> @@ -752,10 +753,25 @@ static int iommu_create_device_direct_mappings(struct iommu_group *group,
>   			phys_addr_t phys_addr;
>   
>   			phys_addr = iommu_iova_to_phys(domain, addr);
> -			if (phys_addr)
> +			if (phys_addr == 0) {
> +				unmapped_sz += pg_size; /* Gather the size. */
>   				continue;
> +			}

I guess the reason we need to validate every page is because they may 
already have been legitimately mapped if someone else's reserved region 
overlaps - is it worth explicitly validating that, i.e. bail out if 
something's gone wrong enough that phys_addr != addr?

Other than the naming issue (I agree that map_size is a far, far better 
choice), I don't have any strong opinions about the rest of the 
implementation - I've written enough variations of this pattern to know 
that there's just no "nice" way to do it in C; all you can do is shuffle 
the clunkiness around :)

Robin.

>   
> -			ret = iommu_map(domain, addr, addr, pg_size, entry->prot);
> +			if (unmapped_sz) {
> +				/* Map the region before the overlap. */
> +				ret = iommu_map(domain, start, start,
> +						unmapped_sz, entry->prot);
> +				if (ret)
> +					goto out;
> +				start += unmapped_sz;
> +				unmapped_sz = 0;
> +			}
> +			start += pg_size;
> +		}
> +		if (unmapped_sz) {
> +			ret = iommu_map(domain, start, start, unmapped_sz,
> +					entry->prot);
>   			if (ret)
>   				goto out;
>   		}
> 

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel