From: Steve Clevenger <scclevenger@os.amperecomputing.com>
To: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>,
Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>,
James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>, Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
coresight@lists.linaro.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] coresight: tmc: Make etr buffer mode user configurable from sysfs
Date: Mon, 28 Aug 2023 09:35:29 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc1b1082-2bcb-9d76-afc7-0e12edd694f0@os.amperecomputing.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1b2a035c-489e-ace9-f851-c1ec157ff9fa@arm.com>
Hi Suzuki,
On 8/27/2023 2:35 PM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> Hi Steve
>
> On 26/08/2023 01:14, Steve Clevenger wrote:
>>
>> Unfortunately, I tested with the original patch not [PATCH V2]. I've
>> remedied this. My results below:
>>
>> [root@sut01sys-b212 linux]# cat
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu123/ARMHC501\:23/tmc_etr35/buf_modes_available
>> auto flat catu
>> [root@sut01sys-b212 linux]# cat
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu123/ARMHC501\:23/tmc_etr35/buf_mode_preferred
>> auto
>> [root@sut01sys-b212 linux]# echo "catu" >
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu123/ARMHC501\:23/tmc_etr35/buf_mode_preferred
>> [root@sut01sys-b212 linux]# cat
>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu123/ARMHC501\:23/tmc_etr35/buf_mode_preferred
>> catu
>>
>> As with the V1 patch, auto defaults to catu.
>>
>> I expected to see tmc-sg (former default) as an available mode, but do
>> not. As I recall, the buffer mode defaulted to ETR scatter-gather prior
>> to this patch. Must this capability now be explicitly advertised? I've
>> seen this done as "arm,scatter-gather" in device trees, but not used by
>> Ampere. Perhaps someone can enlighten me.
>
> Yes, you must add that property to the TMC-ETR node (for both DT and
> ACPI). In the past, almost all of the TMC-ETRs (except Juno board)
> locked up the system while using the SG mode (due to the interconnect
> issues, something to do with the transaction). Thus, we decided to
> add a property explicitly enabling this for a given platform.
>
> When you mentioned, it was using TMC-ETR SG mode, how did you verify
> this ? Please be aware that the table allocation code etc are shared
> by both TMC-SG and CATU.
>
You might recall how this started. I had no way to test the CATU due to
the order the ETR modes defaulted (Flat, ETR-SG, CATU). For test
purposes, I programmatically swapped the ETR-SG/CATU order and could
then verify CATU operation by the driver calling into CATU code. This
suggests Flat mode was bypassed, and the driver defaulted to ETR-SG
prior to this hack. This didn't offer the user any control, hence my
feature request. Note that most of the early Ampere self-hosted trace
collection used ETR-SG. Now I can't select it.
How is this property described in the ACPI? The "ACPI for CoreSight™ 1.1
Platform Design Document" (DEN0067) doesn't describe this.
Thanks,
Steve
> Kind regards
> Suzuki
>
>>
>> Steve C.
>>
>> On 8/23/2023 4:10 PM, Steve Clevenger wrote:
>>>
>>> Here's some quick feedback. My system shows two modes available; auto
>>> catu
>>>
>>> etr_buf_mode_current is writable. I expected to see tmc-sg (former
>>> default) listed in etr_buf_modes_available but it doesn't show up.
>>>
>>> Note that both the auto and catu etr_buf_mode_current settings default
>>> to catu. My understanding is auto should revert to the default behavior.
>>> On my system the default was tmc-sg.
>>>
>>> More later.
>>>
>>> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# cat
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/ARMHC501\:60/tmc_etr96/etr_buf_modes_available
>>>
>>> auto catu
>>> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# cat
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/ARMHC501\:60/tmc_etr96/etr_buf_mode_current
>>> catu
>>> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# echo "catu" >
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/ARMHC501\:60/tmc_etr96/etr_buf_mode_current
>>> [root@sut01sys-b212 kernel]# cat
>>> /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu20/ARMHC501\:60/tmc_etr96/etr_buf_mode_current
>>> catu
>>>
>>> Steve C.
>>>
>>>
>>> On 8/21/2023 12:40 PM, Steve Clevenger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi Suzuki,
>>>>
>>>> I may be able to test it this week. You've already pointed me at the
>>>> patch thread(s). The main holdup is I need to merge the 6.6 pending
>>>> platform work in order to use the Ampere ACPI. I couldn't get these
>>>> patches to apply directly to 6.4 last I tried.
>>>>
>>>> Steve C.
>>>>
>>>> On 8/18/2023 2:39 AM, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
>>>>> Cc: Steve
>>>>>
>>>>> Steve,
>>>>>
>>>>> Are you able to test this with CATU ?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On 18/08/2023 09:21, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
>>>>>> Currently TMC-ETR automatically selects the buffer mode from all
>>>>>> available
>>>>>> methods in the following sequentially fallback manner - also in that
>>>>>> order.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. FLAT mode with or without IOMMU
>>>>>> 2. TMC-ETR-SG (scatter gather) mode when available
>>>>>> 3. CATU mode when available
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But this order might not be ideal for all situations. For example if
>>>>>> there
>>>>>> is a CATU connected to ETR, it may be better to use TMC-ETR scatter
>>>>>> gather
>>>>>> method, rather than CATU. But hard coding such order changes will
>>>>>> prevent
>>>>>> us from testing or using a particular mode. This change provides
>>>>>> following
>>>>>> new sysfs tunables for the user to control TMC-ETR buffer mode
>>>>>> explicitly,
>>>>>> if required. This adds following new sysfs files for buffer mode
>>>>>> selection
>>>>>> purpose explicitly in the user space.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etr<N>/buf_modes_available
>>>>>> /sys/bus/coresight/devices/tmc_etr<N>/buf_mode_preferred
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ cat buf_modes_available
>>>>>> auto flat tmc-sg catu ------------------> Supported TMC-ETR buffer
>>>>>> modes
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ echo catu > buf_mode_preferred -------> Explicit buffer mode
>>>>>> request
>>>>>>
>>>>>> But explicit user request has to be within supported ETR buffer modes
>>>>>> only.
>>>>>> These sysfs interface files are exclussive to ETR, and hence these
>>>>>> are
>>>>>> not
>>>>>> available for other TMC devices such as ETB or ETF etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> A new auto' mode (i.e ETR_MODE_AUTO) has been added to help fallback
>>>>>> to the
>>>>>> existing default behaviour, when user provided preferred buffer mode
>>>>>> fails.
>>>>>> ETR_MODE_FLAT and ETR_MODE_AUTO are always available as preferred
>>>>>> modes.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cc: Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org>
>>>>>> Cc: James Clark <james.clark@arm.com>
>>>>>> Cc: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org>
>>>>>> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>
>>>>>> Cc: coresight@lists.linaro.org
>>>>>> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
>>>>>> Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Anshuman Khandual <anshuman.khandual@arm.com>
>>>>>> ---
>>>>>> This applies on v6.5-rc6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in V2:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Renamed sysfs file etr_buf_modes_available as buf_modes_available
>>>>>> - Renamed sysfs file buf_mode_current as buf_mode_preferred
>>>>>> - Renamed etr_supports_flat_mode() as etr_can_use_flat_mode()
>>>>>> - Renamed coresight_tmc_groups[] as coresight_etf_groups[]
>>>>>> - Reused coresight_tmc_group[] for trigger_cntr and buffer_size
>>>>>> - Fallback trying ETR_MODE_AUTO when user preferred mode fails
>>>>>> - Moved ETR sysfs details into coresight-tmc-etr.c
>>>>>> - Dropped etr_can_use_flat_mode() check while offering ETR_MODE_FLAT
>>>>>> in sysfs
>>>>>> - Moved struct etr_buf_hw inside coresight-tmc-etr.c
>>>>>> - Moved get_etr_buf_hw() and etr_can_use_flat_mode() inside
>>>>>> coresight-tmc-etr.c
>>>>>> - Updated month in
>>>>>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tmc
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes in V1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230728084837.276551-1-anshuman.khandual@arm.com/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .../testing/sysfs-bus-coresight-devices-tmc | 16 +++
>>>>>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-core.c | 15 ++-
>>>>>> .../hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc-etr.c | 111
>>>>>> ++++++++++++++++--
>>>>>> drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-tmc.h | 3 +
>>>>>> 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Looks good to me.
>>>>>
>>>>> Suzuki
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-08-28 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-08-18 8:21 [PATCH V2] coresight: tmc: Make etr buffer mode user configurable from sysfs Anshuman Khandual
2023-08-18 9:39 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-21 19:40 ` Steve Clevenger OS
2023-08-23 23:10 ` Steve Clevenger
2023-08-26 0:14 ` Steve Clevenger
2023-08-27 21:35 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-08-28 16:35 ` Steve Clevenger [this message]
2023-08-30 16:04 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-09-01 12:22 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-09-07 21:31 ` Steve Clevenger
2023-12-04 21:41 ` Steve Clevenger
2023-12-11 15:42 ` Suzuki K Poulose
2023-09-15 9:53 ` Anshuman Khandual
2023-10-16 22:58 ` Suzuki K Poulose
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cc1b1082-2bcb-9d76-afc7-0e12edd694f0@os.amperecomputing.com \
--to=scclevenger@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
--cc=coresight@lists.linaro.org \
--cc=james.clark@arm.com \
--cc=leo.yan@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mike.leach@linaro.org \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).