From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: kirill@shutemov.name (Kirill A. Shutemov) Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 12:37:59 +0300 Subject: [RFC] ptrace: system call number interpretation during PTRACE_SET_SYSCALL request handling In-Reply-To: <20080601083036.GD5818@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> References: <484047C3.4090509@gmail.com> <20080601083036.GD5818@flint.arm.linux.org.uk> Message-ID: To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Jun 1, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote: > On Fri, May 30, 2008 at 09:30:27PM +0300, Volodymyr G. Lukiianyk wrote: >> I've encountered a problem while running strace on the kernel with >> CONFIG_AEABI not set. This problem can be worked around in userspace, >> but it looks like the correct place for a fix is the kernel. > > I'm really nervous about this. ?I need to check what my own strace > patches do - and if they don't suffer from this problem I'd say that > the bug lies in userspace. Any results? Do we need to workaround it in user space or it will be fixed in kernel? > Yes, for a long time I've had patches to strace to add proper ARM > support and fix a load of issues with it, but I've never been able > to get them integrated into strace itself. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------- > List admin: http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel > FAQ: ? ? ? ?http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/faq.php > Etiquette: ?http://www.arm.linux.org.uk/mailinglists/etiquette.php >