From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8DCBCC433FF for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 640D32089E for ; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:40:37 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="e7BpRZRk"; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=st.com header.i=@st.com header.b="hdHXeNjd" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 640D32089E Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=st.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender:Content-Type: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post:List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date:Message-ID:From: References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Owner; bh=w0cbcOfQIsvWkAaBwJW75UbVNjFMK9qVCWgWtLgDQJI=; b=e7BpRZRkVvO/bVrHuSNoBrgp0 csABxG9Aet2JGaBjHeQL7Xsmcf5T3KKCWNqCB1P58APMPuVHl+IVPYK/Dyf6Cb9CZCfG6o6rhvL/7 2S2FbTXlzisA5FAYkMb0Kmd48sJ55FnNEoFpW/ukuK9rNYBLTyUwvW5YcYg0ZAOmKSuqE8QSeJiTs lfU/Lxn3H1c1StbGe9UG4NvRI6NnTzz6kn4+mFuihXBr05ItyveoWMfRLNU6udkGdOx+lB6MXmPR5 nWqw4hkOYuzKWfhm7JCTr5il8gQHvg2XcdbPYZqqtK/bkM/KSLlfkD5Tzhh/SSlBzZ0Vntvybi1md 5QCqz0ExQ==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hspmH-0006cT-PO; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:40:29 +0000 Received: from mx08-00178001.pphosted.com ([91.207.212.93] helo=mx07-00178001.pphosted.com) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hspmE-0006c4-8E for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:40:27 +0000 Received: from pps.filterd (m0046660.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx08-00178001.pphosted.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x6VEcGiP031653; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:40:19 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=st.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=STMicroelectronics; bh=AFDZi45NFu0boqD+CAnY4m7Y5fAiIfy1q8BHKSUyjP8=; b=hdHXeNjda3sh2xQpndsqpigl53QQIGQeef4AE++pk6q4aoeHiWh4VNKighKTmboeWN0J 6fdMVK8oo3aD76eXZDTqCdan5VGuA/8a8l47Hdpoq2C+fQEV2x+NiSkxCUPuZTCwzVpa s2205slvDSMfpooFTvRZz2/fNEA9YAKwhs3HgjxQi1wcgnyE2MWvMQFmuKooddl5eIZU NAmH6KAYsQ9dQujJ4EqJqimHdx+hMtsHrfAdw0YQpofH9Y3sUHlSsIpPFJlUus9eMbT7 SbI0D63j2Pz5emFhBr1VnYyEr8fLiIMGMEhFVzUWElaZBdbIghP9Enysptia3K0tUkgL OA== Received: from beta.dmz-eu.st.com (beta.dmz-eu.st.com [164.129.1.35]) by mx08-00178001.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 2u0bra5253-1 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:40:19 +0200 Received: from euls16034.sgp.st.com (euls16034.sgp.st.com [10.75.44.20]) by beta.dmz-eu.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id 09B0D41; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 14:40:18 +0000 (GMT) Received: from Webmail-eu.st.com (sfhdag3node2.st.com [10.75.127.8]) by euls16034.sgp.st.com (STMicroelectronics) with ESMTP id DF58FAE6AC; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:40:18 +0200 (CEST) Received: from lmecxl0912.lme.st.com (10.75.127.44) by SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1347.2; Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:40:18 +0200 Subject: Re: ARM: multi_v7_defconfig: Enable SPI_STM32_QSPI support To: Olof Johansson References: <20190729135505.15394-1-patrice.chotard@st.com> From: Alexandre Torgue Message-ID: Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2019 16:40:17 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.8.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US X-Originating-IP: [10.75.127.44] X-ClientProxiedBy: SFHDAG2NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.5) To SFHDAG3NODE2.st.com (10.75.127.8) X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-07-31_06:, , signatures=0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190731_074026_757601_31DF276E X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 15.46 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Arnd Bergmann , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Patrice CHOTARD , Russell King , linux-stm32@st-md-mailman.stormreply.com, Linux ARM Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; Format="flowed" Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 7/31/19 3:21 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:20 PM Olof Johansson wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 8:48 AM Alexandre Torgue >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Olof >>> >>> On 7/30/19 7:36 PM, Olof Johansson wrote: >>>> Hi Patrice, >>>> >>>> If you cc soc@kernel.org on patches you want us to apply, you'll get >>>> them automatically tracked by patchwork. >>>> >>> >>> Does it means that you will take it directly in arm-soc tree ? >>> I mean, I used to take this kind of patch (multi-v7_defconfig patch >>> linked to STM32 driver) in my stm32 branch and to send PR for them. >> >> You can do that too -- it was unclear to me whether you posted the >> patch with us in the To: line because you wanted it applied or not. > > Also, we request that platform maintainers keep the defconfig updates > in a separate branch, since we normally track them in a separate > branch on our side. So if you do it in the future, please send > separate PR. > > For single patches, it's just as easy to send us the patch as a pull request. > Ok. So I'll continue as I did :) Thanks for clarifications Alex > > Thanks, > > -Olof > _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel