From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br (Marcelo Jimenez)
Date: Wed, 24 Mar 2010 20:20:19 -0300
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ARM: pcmcia: fix checkpatch.pl issues in soc_common.c
In-Reply-To: <20100324230729.GA21359@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
References: <1269471898-26301-1-git-send-email-mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
	<1269471898-26301-2-git-send-email-mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
	<20100324230729.GA21359@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <cecb6d8f1003241620v55fb960ds14818bf3a03fa334@mail.gmail.com>
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org

On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 20:07, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@arm.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 08:04:58PM -0300, Marcelo Roberto Jimenez wrote:
>> - ? ? debug(skt, 2, "mask: %s%s%s%s%s%sflags: %s%s%s%s%s%sVcc %d Vpp %d irq %d\n",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->csc_mask==0)?"<NONE> ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->csc_mask&SS_DETECT)?"DETECT ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->csc_mask&SS_READY)?"READY ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->csc_mask&SS_BATDEAD)?"BATDEAD ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->csc_mask&SS_BATWARN)?"BATWARN ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->csc_mask&SS_STSCHG)?"STSCHG ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->flags==0)?"<NONE> ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->flags&SS_PWR_AUTO)?"PWR_AUTO ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->flags&SS_IOCARD)?"IOCARD ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->flags&SS_RESET)?"RESET ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->flags&SS_SPKR_ENA)?"SPKR_ENA ":"",
>> - ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? (state->flags&SS_OUTPUT_ENA)?"OUTPUT_ENA ":"",
>> + ? ? debug(skt, 2, ? "mask: %s%s%s%s%s%s "
>> + ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? "flags: %s%s%s%s%s%s Vcc %d Vpp %d irq %d\n",
>
> NAK. ?Breaking kernel messages across multiple lines makes them impossible
> to grep for. ?checkpatch.pl is wrong on this one.

I will redo it, no problem. But just for my information, in that
particular case, is it usefull to grep using format specifiers?