From: mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br (Marcelo Jimenez)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: Fix for the use of wrong CPU_FREQ code in nanoengine.
Date: Sat, 27 Mar 2010 19:30:34 -0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cecb6d8f1003271530w11943d52hc1c815b23722fb35@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20100327230727.10def37d.kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Hi Kristoffer,
On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 19:07, Kristoffer Ericson
<kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Mar 2010 18:53:10 -0300
> Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br> wrote:
>
>> This patch selects the right CPU_FREQ module to use with nanoengine.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Marcelo Roberto Jimenez <mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br>
>
> I think you should add more information regarding the patch.
> Like addition of memory, extending the sdram_params->name length,
> Cleaning up header content and order.
> Just looking at the commit message it doesnt cover everything thats done.
Ok, will do that.
> Also, for me this doesnt apply at all. It might be my setup
> being corrupt, but is it synced with latest git?
>
> Patch number 2 doesnt either apply for me.
Sorry, they depend upon my first patch set, the one that adds
nanoengine back to the kernel. I thought about merging it with the
first, but I also thought it might cause confusion if someone had
already applied it:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.200959.9dd2e2d1.en.html
The other patches are:
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201022.58a74029.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201023.17169815.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201024.d78c81ac.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100311.201025.b9812efa.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100312.142346.0f32234c.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100312.142347.0c7e0e21.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100324.230457.f07b83bd.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100324.234510.4e6f1816.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100326.215310.ba4ef076.en.html
http://lists.arm.linux.org.uk/lurker/message/20100326.215311.ce1245a0.en.html
A total of eleven patches. The only dependency up to now is that the
last patch depends on the first.
> Best wishes
> Kristoffer
Regards,
Marcelo.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-03-27 22:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-03-26 21:53 [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: Fix for the use of wrong CPU_FREQ code in nanoengine Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
2010-03-26 21:53 ` [PATCH 2/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: fix checkpatch.pl issues Marcelo Roberto Jimenez
2010-03-27 22:07 ` [PATCH 1/2] ARM: mach-sa1100: Fix for the use of wrong CPU_FREQ code in nanoengine Kristoffer Ericson
2010-03-27 22:30 ` Marcelo Jimenez [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cecb6d8f1003271530w11943d52hc1c815b23722fb35@mail.gmail.com \
--to=mroberto@cpti.cetuc.puc-rio.br \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).