From: josh.cartwright@ni.com (Josh Cartwright)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups
Date: Sun, 28 Oct 2012 17:26:05 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1351466765.git.josh.cartwright@ni.com> (raw)
Michal-
Here is a v5 of the zynq cleanup patchset that addresses your feedback. I've
intentionally left patches 4 and 5 in the set until we figure out the
appropriate way to get them in tree (feel free to just apply 1-3)
I've also moved the uart mapping in patch 5 to a known working address, until
we can work out what is happening there. This should allow this patchset to be
applied and have the zc702 boot.
You had suggested removing/renaming the zynq-ep107.dts; it wasn't clear whether
you had wanted that in this patchset or not. I'm going to assume not. I'll
follow up with this, after this patchset is applied, if that works for you.
Thanks,
Josh
---
Things have been relatively quiet on the Zynq front lately. This patchset does
a bit of cleanup of the Zynq subarchitecture. It was the necessary set of
things I had to do to get a zynq target booting with the upstream qemu model.
Patches 1 and 2 move zynq to use the GIC and pl310 L2 cache controller device
tree bindings respectively.
Patch 3 removes unused clock infrastructure. The plan is to rework the
out-of-tree Xilinx generic clk support into something suitable for merging.
What's in tree now just isn't used at all, and can be removed.
Patch 4 and 5 move around the static peripheral mappings into the vmalloc area.
---
Changes since v4:
- Fixed uart interrupt spec in zynq-ep107.dtb (patch 1)
- Moved early uart mapping to a known working address (patch 5)
Changes since v3:
- Patch 3 also removes the zynq "use" of versatile
Changes since v2:
- Reordered patchset to prevent remapping peripherals that were subsequently
removed from the static map
- Use DT bindings for the L2 cache controller
Changes since v1:
- Make sure arm at kernel.org was included
- Rebased on arm-soc/for-next
- Added a cover letter
- Elaborated a bit on why I removed CLKDEV_LOOKUP
---
Josh Cartwright (5):
zynq: use GIC device tree bindings
zynq: use pl310 device tree bindings
zynq: remove use of CLKDEV_LOOKUP
ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC
zynq: move static peripheral mappings
arch/arm/Kconfig | 1 -
arch/arm/Makefile | 1 -
arch/arm/boot/dts/zynq-ep107.dts | 19 ++++++++++++++----
arch/arm/include/asm/pgtable.h | 2 +-
arch/arm/mach-zynq/common.c | 23 ++++++++++-----------
arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/clkdev.h | 32 ------------------------------
arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/zynq_soc.h | 31 ++++++++++++++---------------
7 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 68 deletions(-)
delete mode 100644 arch/arm/mach-zynq/include/mach/clkdev.h
--
1.8.0
next reply other threads:[~2012-10-28 23:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-10-28 23:26 Josh Cartwright [this message]
2012-10-18 0:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] zynq: use GIC device tree bindings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-29 7:59 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-21 16:17 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] zynq: remove use of CLKDEV_LOOKUP Josh Cartwright
2012-10-29 8:00 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-21 23:33 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] ARM: annotate VMALLOC_END definition with _AC Josh Cartwright
2012-10-22 2:15 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] zynq: move static peripheral mappings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-29 8:00 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-23 22:34 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] zynq: use pl310 device tree bindings Josh Cartwright
2012-10-29 8:00 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-29 0:16 ` [PATCH v4 0/5] zynq subarch cleanups Josh Cartwright
2012-10-29 7:24 ` Michal Simek
2012-10-29 13:36 ` Josh Cartwright
2012-10-29 14:48 ` Michal Simek
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2012-10-24 20:02 Josh Cartwright
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1351466765.git.josh.cartwright@ni.com \
--to=josh.cartwright@ni.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).