linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: luto@amacapital.net (Andy Lutomirski)
To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes
Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2014 18:49:13 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1405992946.git.luto@amacapital.net> (raw)

[applies on jmorris's security-next tree]

This is both a cleanup and a speedup.  It reduces overhead due to
installing a trivial seccomp filter by 87%.  The speedup comes from
avoiding the full syscall tracing mechanism for filters that don't
return SECCOMP_RET_TRACE.

This series works by splitting the seccomp hooks into two phases.
The first phase evaluates the filter; it can skip syscalls, allow
them, kill the calling task, or pass a u32 to the second phase.  The
second phase requires a full tracing context, and it sends ptrace
events if necessary.

Once this is done, I implemented a similar split for the x86 syscall
entry work.  The C callback is invoked in two phases: the first has
only a partial frame, and it can request phase 2 processing with a
full frame.

Finally, I switch the 64-bit system_call code to use the new split
entry work.  This is a net deletion of assembly code: it replaces
all of the audit entry muck.

In the process, I fixed some bugs.

If this is acceptable, someone can do the same tweak for the
ia32entry and entry_32 code.

This passes all seccomp tests that I know of.  Now that it's properly
rebased, even the previously expected failures are gone.

Kees, if you like this version, can you create a branch with patches
1-4?  I think that the rest should go into tip/x86 once everyone's happy
with it.

Changes from v2:
 - Fixed 32-bit x86 build (and the tests pass).
 - Put the doc patch where it belongs.

Changes from v1:
 - Rebased on top of Kees' shiny new seccomp tree (no effect on the x86
   part).
 - Improved patch 6 vs patch 7 split (thanks Alexei!)
 - Fixed bogus -ENOSYS in patch 5 (thanks Kees!)
 - Improved changelog message in patch 6.

Changes from RFC version:
 - The first three patches are more or less the same
 - The rest is more or less a rewrite

Andy Lutomirski (8):
  seccomp,x86,arm,mips,s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing
  seccomp: Refactor the filter callback and the API
  seccomp: Allow arch code to provide seccomp_data
  seccomp: Document two-phase seccomp and arch-provided seccomp_data
  x86,x32,audit: Fix x32's AUDIT_ARCH wrt audit
  x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases
  x86_64,entry: Treat regs->ax the same in fastpath and slowpath
    syscalls
  x86_64,entry: Use split-phase syscall_trace_enter for 64-bit syscalls

 arch/Kconfig                   |  11 ++
 arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c       |   7 +-
 arch/mips/kernel/ptrace.c      |   2 +-
 arch/s390/kernel/ptrace.c      |   2 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/calling.h |   6 +-
 arch/x86/include/asm/ptrace.h  |   5 +
 arch/x86/kernel/entry_64.S     |  51 ++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/ptrace.c       | 150 +++++++++++++++++++-----
 arch/x86/kernel/vsyscall_64.c  |   2 +-
 include/linux/seccomp.h        |  25 ++--
 kernel/seccomp.c               | 252 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------
 11 files changed, 360 insertions(+), 153 deletions(-)

-- 
1.9.3

             reply	other threads:[~2014-07-22  1:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-22  1:49 Andy Lutomirski [this message]
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 1/8] seccomp, x86, arm, mips, s390: Remove nr parameter from secure_computing Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 2/8] seccomp: Refactor the filter callback and the API Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 3/8] seccomp: Allow arch code to provide seccomp_data Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:49 ` [PATCH v3 4/8] seccomp: Document two-phase seccomp and arch-provided seccomp_data Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:53 ` [PATCH v3 5/8] x86,x32,audit: Fix x32's AUDIT_ARCH wrt audit Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:53   ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-28 17:37     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-28 18:58       ` TIF_NOHZ can escape nonhz mask? (Was: [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases) Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-28 19:22         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-29 17:54           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-30 16:35             ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-30 17:46               ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31  0:30                 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 16:03                   ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 17:13                     ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 18:12                       ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-31 18:47                         ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 18:50                           ` Frederic Weisbecker
2014-07-31 19:05                             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-02 17:30                           ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-08-04 12:02                             ` Paul E. McKenney
2014-07-28 20:23       ` [PATCH v3 6/8] x86: Split syscall_trace_enter into two phases Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 16:54         ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 17:01           ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 17:31             ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 17:55               ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 18:16                 ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-29 18:22                   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-29 18:44                     ` Oleg Nesterov
2014-07-22  1:53   ` [PATCH v3 7/8] x86_64, entry: Treat regs->ax the same in fastpath and slowpath syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22  1:53   ` [PATCH v3 8/8] x86_64, entry: Use split-phase syscall_trace_enter for 64-bit syscalls Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-22 19:37 ` [PATCH v3 0/8] Two-phase seccomp and x86 tracing changes Kees Cook
2014-07-23 19:20   ` Andy Lutomirski
2014-07-28 17:59     ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:29       ` Kees Cook
2014-07-28 23:34         ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:42           ` Kees Cook
2014-07-28 23:45             ` H. Peter Anvin
2014-07-28 23:54               ` Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1405992946.git.luto@amacapital.net \
    --to=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).