[PATCH 0/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug and add bounds-checking coverage

[PATCH 0/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug and add bounds-checking coverage

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

This small series aims to fix an undefined behavior bug in
`struct visconti_pll_provider` and add bounds-checking
coverage at run-time for flexible-array member `hws`
in `struct clk_hw_onecell_data` when accessed throught
`struct visconti_pll_provider`.

Gustavo A. R. Silva (2):
  clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct
    visconti_pll_provider
  clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct
    visconti_pll_provider

 drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c | 6 +++---
 drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h | 4 +++-
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

`struct clk_hw_onecell_data` is a flexible structure, which means that
it contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case array
`hws`:

include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
1381         unsigned int num;
1382         struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
1383 };

This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following
`clk_data` in `struct visconti_pll_provider`, in this case
`struct device_node *node;`, at run-time:

drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
 16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
 17         void __iomem *reg_base;
 18         struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
 19         struct device_node *node;
 20 };

Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array `hws`
at line 328. See below:

include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
 14 #define TMPV770X_NR_PLL		7

drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
 69 ctx = visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);

drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
321 struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node *np,
322                                                         void __iomem *base,
323                                                         unsigned long nr_plls)
324 {
325         struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
...
328         ctx = kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls), GFP_KERNEL);

`struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls)` above translates to
sizeof(struct visconti_pll_provider) + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * 7 ==
24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56
		  ^^^^
		   |
	allocated bytes for flex array `hws`

$ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o
struct visconti_pll_provider {
	void *                     reg_base;             /*     0     8 */
	struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;             /*     8     8 */
	struct device_node *       node;                 /*    16     8 */

	/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
	/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
};

And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members
of `struct visconti_pll_provider`:

332         for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
333                 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
334
335         ctx->node = np;
336         ctx->reg_base = base;
337         ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;

Fix all these by placing the declaration of object `clk_data` at the
end of `struct visconti_pll_provider`. Also, add a comment to make it
clear that this object must always be last in the structure, and
prevent this bug from being introduced again in the future.

Fixes: b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h | 4 +++-
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h
index 01d07f1bf01b..c4bd40676da4 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h
+++ b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h
@@ -15,8 +15,10 @@
 
 struct visconti_pll_provider {
 	void __iomem *reg_base;
-	struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
 	struct device_node *node;
+
+	/* Must be last */
+	struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
 };
 
 #define VISCONTI_PLL_RATE(_rate, _dacen, _dsmen, \
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

[PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct visconti_pll_provider

[Gustavo A. R. Silva]

In order to gain the bounds-checking coverage that __counted_by provides
to flexible-array members at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array
indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions),
we must make sure that the counter member, in this particular case `num`,
is updated before the first access to the flex-array member, in this
particular case array `hws`. See below:

commit f316cdff8d67 ("clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with
__counted_by") introduced `__counted_by` for `struct clk_hw_onecell_data`
together with changes to relocate some of assignments of counter `num`
before `hws` is accessed:

include/linux/clk-provider.h:
1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
1381         unsigned int num;
1382         struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
1383 };

However, this structure is used as a member in other structs, in this
case in `struct visconti_pll_provider`:

drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
 16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
 17         void __iomem *reg_base;
 18         struct device_node *node;
 19 
 20         /* Must be last */
 21         struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
 22 };

Hence, we need to move the assignments to `ctx->clk_data.num` after
allocation for `struct visconti_pll_provider` and before accessing the
flexible array `ctx->clk_data.hws`. And, as assignments for all members
in `struct visconti_pll_provider` are originally adjacent to each other,
relocate all assignments together, so we don't split up
`ctx->clk_data.hws = nr_plls` from the rest. :)

Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
---
 drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
index 1f3234f22667..e9cd80e085dc 100644
--- a/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
+++ b/drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c
@@ -329,12 +329,12 @@ struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node *np,
 	if (!ctx)
 		return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
 
-	for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
-		ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
-
 	ctx->node = np;
 	ctx->reg_base = base;
 	ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;
 
+	for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
+		ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
+
 	return ctx;
 }
-- 
2.34.1


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider

[Kees Cook]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 08:17:36PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> `struct clk_hw_onecell_data` is a flexible structure, which means that
> it contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case array
> `hws`:
> 
> include/linux/clk-provider.h:
> 1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> 1381         unsigned int num;
> 1382         struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
> 1383 };
> 
> This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following
> `clk_data` in `struct visconti_pll_provider`, in this case
> `struct device_node *node;`, at run-time:
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
>  16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
>  17         void __iomem *reg_base;
>  18         struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
>  19         struct device_node *node;
>  20 };
> 
> Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array `hws`
> at line 328. See below:
> 
> include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
>  14 #define TMPV770X_NR_PLL		7
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
>  69 ctx = visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
> 321 struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node *np,
> 322                                                         void __iomem *base,
> 323                                                         unsigned long nr_plls)
> 324 {
> 325         struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
> ...
> 328         ctx = kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls), GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> `struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls)` above translates to
> sizeof(struct visconti_pll_provider) + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * 7 ==
> 24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56
> 		  ^^^^
> 		   |
> 	allocated bytes for flex array `hws`
> 
> $ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o
> struct visconti_pll_provider {
> 	void *                     reg_base;             /*     0     8 */
> 	struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;             /*     8     8 */
> 	struct device_node *       node;                 /*    16     8 */
> 
> 	/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
> 	/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
> };
> 
> And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members
> of `struct visconti_pll_provider`:
> 
> 332         for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
> 333                 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> 334
> 335         ctx->node = np;
> 336         ctx->reg_base = base;
> 337         ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;
> 
> Fix all these by placing the declaration of object `clk_data` at the
> end of `struct visconti_pll_provider`. Also, add a comment to make it
> clear that this object must always be last in the structure, and
> prevent this bug from being introduced again in the future.
> 
> Fixes: b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and reset driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Another good catch. :)

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

Re: [PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct visconti_pll_provider

[Kees Cook]

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 08:18:45PM -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> In order to gain the bounds-checking coverage that __counted_by provides
> to flexible-array members at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array
> indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family functions),
> we must make sure that the counter member, in this particular case `num`,
> is updated before the first access to the flex-array member, in this
> particular case array `hws`. See below:
> 
> commit f316cdff8d67 ("clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with
> __counted_by") introduced `__counted_by` for `struct clk_hw_onecell_data`
> together with changes to relocate some of assignments of counter `num`
> before `hws` is accessed:
> 
> include/linux/clk-provider.h:
> 1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> 1381         unsigned int num;
> 1382         struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
> 1383 };
> 
> However, this structure is used as a member in other structs, in this
> case in `struct visconti_pll_provider`:
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
>  16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
>  17         void __iomem *reg_base;
>  18         struct device_node *node;
>  19 
>  20         /* Must be last */
>  21         struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
>  22 };
> 
> Hence, we need to move the assignments to `ctx->clk_data.num` after
> allocation for `struct visconti_pll_provider` and before accessing the
> flexible array `ctx->clk_data.hws`. And, as assignments for all members
> in `struct visconti_pll_provider` are originally adjacent to each other,
> relocate all assignments together, so we don't split up
> `ctx->clk_data.hws = nr_plls` from the rest. :)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Looks good; thanks!

Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>

-- 
Kees Cook

_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct visconti_pll_provider

[nobuhiro1.iwamatsu]

Hi Gustavo A. R. Silva,

Thanks for your patch!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 11:18 AM
> To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sboyd@kernel.org>; iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○ＤＩＴＣ□ＤＩＴ○Ｏ
> ＳＴ) <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Gustavo A.
> R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>; linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 1/2][next] clk: visconti: Fix undefined behavior bug in struct
> visconti_pll_provider
> 
> `struct clk_hw_onecell_data` is a flexible structure, which means that it
> contains flexible-array member at the bottom, in this case array
> `hws`:
> 
> include/linux/clk-provider.h:
> 1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> 1381         unsigned int num;
> 1382         struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
> 1383 };
> 
> This could potentially lead to an overwrite of the objects following `clk_data` in
> `struct visconti_pll_provider`, in this case `struct device_node *node;`, at
> run-time:
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
>  16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
>  17         void __iomem *reg_base;
>  18         struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
>  19         struct device_node *node;
>  20 };
> 
> Notice that a total of 56 bytes are allocated for flexible-array `hws` at line 328.
> See below:
> 
> include/dt-bindings/clock/toshiba,tmpv770x.h:
>  14 #define TMPV770X_NR_PLL		7
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll-tmpv770x.c:
>  69 ctx = visconti_init_pll(np, reg_base, TMPV770X_NR_PLL);
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll.c:
> 321 struct visconti_pll_provider * __init visconti_init_pll(struct device_node
> *np,
> 322                                                         void __iomem
> *base,
> 323                                                         unsigned long
> nr_plls)
> 324 {
> 325         struct visconti_pll_provider *ctx;
> ...
> 328         ctx = kzalloc(struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls),
> GFP_KERNEL);
> 
> `struct_size(ctx, clk_data.hws, nr_plls)` above translates to sizeof(struct
> visconti_pll_provider) + sizeof(struct clk_hw *) * 7 ==
> 24 + 8 * 7 == 24 + 56
> 		  ^^^^
> 		   |
> 	allocated bytes for flex array `hws`
> 
> $ pahole -C visconti_pll_provider drivers/clk/visconti/pll.o struct
> visconti_pll_provider {
> 	void *                     reg_base;             /*     0     8 */
> 	struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;             /*     8     8 */
> 	struct device_node *       node;                 /*    16     8 */
> 
> 	/* size: 24, cachelines: 1, members: 3 */
> 	/* last cacheline: 24 bytes */
> };
> 
> And then, after the allocation, some data is written into all members of `struct
> visconti_pll_provider`:
> 
> 332         for (i = 0; i < nr_plls; ++i)
> 333                 ctx->clk_data.hws[i] = ERR_PTR(-ENOENT);
> 334
> 335         ctx->node = np;
> 336         ctx->reg_base = base;
> 337         ctx->clk_data.num = nr_plls;
> 
> Fix all these by placing the declaration of object `clk_data` at the end of `struct
> visconti_pll_provider`. Also, add a comment to make it clear that this object
> must always be last in the structure, and prevent this bug from being
> introduced again in the future.
> 
> Fixes: b4cbe606dc36 ("clk: visconti: Add support common clock driver and
> reset driver")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel

RE: [PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for struct visconti_pll_provider

[nobuhiro1.iwamatsu]

Hi Gustavo A. R. Silva,

Thanks for your patch!

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
> Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2023 11:19 AM
> To: Michael Turquette <mturquette@baylibre.com>; Stephen Boyd
> <sboyd@kernel.org>; iwamatsu nobuhiro(岩松 信洋 ○ＤＩＴＣ□ＤＩＴ○Ｏ
> ＳＴ) <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>
> Cc: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>; linux-clk@vger.kernel.org;
> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org; Gustavo A.
> R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>; linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org
> Subject: [PATCH 2/2][next] clk: visconti: Add bounds-checking coverage for
> struct visconti_pll_provider
> 
> In order to gain the bounds-checking coverage that __counted_by provides to
> flexible-array members at run-time via CONFIG_UBSAN_BOUNDS (for array
> indexing) and CONFIG_FORTIFY_SOURCE (for strcpy/memcpy-family
> functions), we must make sure that the counter member, in this particular case
> `num`, is updated before the first access to the flex-array member, in this
> particular case array `hws`. See below:
> 
> commit f316cdff8d67 ("clk: Annotate struct clk_hw_onecell_data with
> __counted_by") introduced `__counted_by` for `struct clk_hw_onecell_data`
> together with changes to relocate some of assignments of counter `num`
> before `hws` is accessed:
> 
> include/linux/clk-provider.h:
> 1380 struct clk_hw_onecell_data {
> 1381         unsigned int num;
> 1382         struct clk_hw *hws[] __counted_by(num);
> 1383 };
> 
> However, this structure is used as a member in other structs, in this case in
> `struct visconti_pll_provider`:
> 
> drivers/clk/visconti/pll.h:
>  16 struct visconti_pll_provider {
>  17         void __iomem *reg_base;
>  18         struct device_node *node;
>  19
>  20         /* Must be last */
>  21         struct clk_hw_onecell_data clk_data;
>  22 };
> 
> Hence, we need to move the assignments to `ctx->clk_data.num` after
> allocation for `struct visconti_pll_provider` and before accessing the flexible
> array `ctx->clk_data.hws`. And, as assignments for all members in `struct
> visconti_pll_provider` are originally adjacent to each other, relocate all
> assignments together, so we don't split up `ctx->clk_data.hws = nr_plls` from
> the rest. :)
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>

Acked-by: Nobuhiro Iwamatsu <nobuhiro1.iwamatsu@toshiba.co.jp>

Best regards,
  Nobuhiro


_______________________________________________
linux-arm-kernel mailing list
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org
http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel