Linux-ARM-Kernel Archive on lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolin Chen <nicolinc@nvidia.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>, Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@nvidia.com>,
	"Kevin Tian" <kevin.tian@intel.com>
Cc: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
	Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>, "Shuah Khan" <shuah@kernel.org>,
	Pranjal Shrivastava <praan@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Yi Liu <yi.l.liu@intel.com>,
	Eric Auger <eric.auger@redhat.com>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
	<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 0/4] iommufd: Cache invalidation hardening and SMMUv3 batching rework
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2026 14:26:52 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1780521606.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com> (raw)

Sashiko pointed out several issues in the iommufd invalidation path, which
also prompted a rework of the ARM SMMUv3 vIOMMU invalidation handler:

 - entry_len is user-controlled and unbounded, so the trailing-zero check
   for its forward-compat fields can scan gigabytes of user memory without
   yielding, long enough to trip the soft-lockup watchdog.

 - A large entry_num drives a backend's per-entry invalidation loop with no
   reschedule, e.g. the VT-d nested path, pinning the CPU.

 - The full-array copy helper copies the array twice on the equal-size fast
   path: once in bulk, then again entry by entry.

 - arm_vsmmu_cache_invalidate() reports converted-but-unsubmitted commands
   as handled on its error paths.

 - It sizes a single kernel allocation from the user-controlled entry_num.

 - It rejects an empty-array data_type probe that the uAPI allows.

Fix them properly.

This is on Github:
https://github.com/nicolinc/iommufd/commits/smmuv3_fix_iommufd-v1

Nicolin Chen (4):
  iommufd: Set upper bounds on cache invalidation entry_num and
    entry_len
  iommufd/selftest: Add invalidation entry_num and entry_len boundary
    tests
  iommu: Avoid copying the user array twice in the full-array copy
    helper
  iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Process vIOMMU invalidations in batches

 include/linux/iommu.h                         |  1 +
 .../arm/arm-smmu-v3/arm-smmu-v3-iommufd.c     | 91 +++++++++++--------
 drivers/iommu/iommufd/hw_pagetable.c          | 11 ++-
 tools/testing/selftests/iommu/iommufd.c       | 15 +++
 4 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 37 deletions(-)

-- 
2.43.0



             reply	other threads:[~2026-06-03 21:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-03 21:26 Nicolin Chen [this message]
2026-06-03 21:26 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] iommufd: Set upper bounds on cache invalidation entry_num and entry_len Nicolin Chen
2026-06-03 21:26 ` [PATCH v1 2/4] iommufd/selftest: Add invalidation entry_num and entry_len boundary tests Nicolin Chen
2026-06-03 21:26 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] iommu: Avoid copying the user array twice in the full-array copy helper Nicolin Chen
2026-06-03 21:26 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Process vIOMMU invalidations in batches Nicolin Chen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1780521606.git.nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --to=nicolinc@nvidia.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=jgg@nvidia.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kevin.tian@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=praan@google.com \
    --cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=yi.l.liu@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox