From: Vitaliy Sochnev <sochnev.v.74@gmail.com>
To: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo@kernel.org>, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: upstream@airoha.com, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@lunn.ch>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Vitaliy Sochnev <sochnev.v.74@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH net v3 0/2] net: airoha: fix silent RX loss on the shared CPU ring
Date: Tue, 1 Sep 2026 19:32:52 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1788286284.git.sochnev.v.74@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260831234701.206021-1-sochnev.v.74@gmail.com>
v3: dropped the RX ring stall recovery (v2 2/3) as asked [1]. At 128 the
stall does not occur - 500 forced PPPoE reconnects over 20 h with the
detector compiled in and armed, zero triggers - and it did not fix the
bug on its own anyway. I will resend it if the stall turns up at the
larger ring.
2/2 keeps its code and its Acked-by; the commit message changed. It now
cites the register capture taken with no recovery in the tree instead of
numbers from builds carrying it, states that 1/2 does not cover this
failure, and quantifies what the bigger rings cost in memory.
v2 [2] answered the v1 review: DONE-bit overwrite hypothesis disproven,
QDMA_DESC_DROP_MASK never set, RX_DSCP_NUM default raised to the vendor
SDK's 32.
Still open for the airoha folks: in 2/2 hw set DONE on descriptor 15
while 0-14 were untouched and the driver's consumer sat at 0. Is
out-of-order completion within an RX ring expected, or is the driver
violating a constraint on RX_CPU_IDX by leaving one descriptor unposted?
Growing the ring avoids the symptom; the rule behind it is still unknown.
Tested on Nokia XG-040G-MF (AN7583) on a live PPPoE line. These two
patches without the recovery are what ran longest here: 508 forced
reconnects over 20 h 32 min, zero rx_dropped/rx_errors across 39158
samples.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/apaA5jDYH71F0JaS@lore-desk/
[2] https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260831234701.206021-1-sochnev.v.74@gmail.com/
Vitaliy Sochnev (2):
net: airoha: handle RX_NO_CPU_DSCP interrupt, not just RX_DONE
net: airoha: grow the small RX rings
drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.c | 16 +++++++++++-----
drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_eth.h | 3 ++-
drivers/net/ethernet/airoha/airoha_regs.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--
2.55.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-09-01 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 9:57 [PATCH 0/4] net: airoha: fix silent RX packet loss on ring 4 Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-30 9:57 ` [PATCH net 1/4] net: airoha: handle RX_NO_CPU_DSCP interrupt, not just RX_DONE Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-30 13:26 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-30 9:57 ` [PATCH net-next 2/4] net: airoha: recover RX ring after hw completion race Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-30 14:18 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-30 9:57 ` [PATCH net-next 3/4] net: airoha: add rx_stall_recover ethtool counter Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-30 9:57 ` [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: airoha: grow RX ring 4 to 128 descriptors Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-30 14:24 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-08-31 23:46 ` [PATCH net v2 0/3] net: airoha: fix silent RX loss on the shared CPU ring Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-31 23:46 ` [PATCH net v2 1/3] net: airoha: handle RX_NO_CPU_DSCP interrupt, not just RX_DONE Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-31 23:47 ` [PATCH net v2 2/3] net: airoha: recover RX ring after hw completion stall Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-09-01 7:38 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-01 18:33 ` Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-08-31 23:47 ` [PATCH net v2 3/3] net: airoha: grow the small RX rings Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-09-01 7:23 ` Lorenzo Bianconi
2026-09-01 18:32 ` Vitaliy Sochnev [this message]
2026-09-01 18:32 ` [PATCH net v3 1/2] net: airoha: handle RX_NO_CPU_DSCP interrupt, not just RX_DONE Vitaliy Sochnev
2026-09-01 18:32 ` [PATCH net v3 2/2] net: airoha: grow the small RX rings Vitaliy Sochnev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=cover.1788286284.git.sochnev.v.74@gmail.com \
--to=sochnev.v.74@gmail.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lorenzo@kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=upstream@airoha.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox