From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8138FC43219 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EA332087B for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="ddnX7IG7" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 4EA332087B Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=free.fr Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Date: Message-ID:From:References:To:Subject:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description :Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=77Y2lnOGWRDcBfbNf1E3imcxfaAtpFe2nWcy/MSL4X0=; b=ddnX7IG7N7T4iQ CQV8K0EO+ppRBU1zzr0cRz8afEzTdeH6wvIHDBz9zYm0LJYyZmo6Maz1yRtFkqBDXOXmHQktxZXfd 1sNQAgrb8Sazq8iwvIz84cee8yrHa0B/ZGXoUyNxqjPe0gwj272FsCIvkqK9lGRZQQvc0qTmp6G+c 3HkA0+3yEPLoUEjbT8CDN1z7DNFYdumsfoMhG+cscBnlL3TXXKz0lH5rSp1+ax1kUZJcr330pPpFU fCDsCF/FKrgJtLhLTYGLnxm0Yav3Cgb1F9Z2wDSjb7KfamNILD2QhB1GbnsxhMnVpoveHdF8L4Pv9 lsyHEju4TiAd1v3hqG5g==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hL1DC-0002WO-7t; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:00:30 +0000 Received: from ns.iliad.fr ([212.27.33.1]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.90_1 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1hL1D8-0002Va-Nd for linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 08:00:28 +0000 Received: from ns.iliad.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ns.iliad.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32BE120CA6; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:00:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.108.49] (freebox.vlq16.iliad.fr [213.36.7.13]) by ns.iliad.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C78D20415; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:00:21 +0200 (CEST) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: List arch/arm64/configs/ explicitly To: Olof Johansson References: <3d1862f6-f83d-dd8f-061f-8feff9588133@free.fr> <20190418131055.GE18646@arrakis.emea.arm.com> <4097b949-f285-b490-23cc-a8b4d9d37edf@free.fr> <20190429063242.blpen7vuuripsf56@localhost> From: Marc Gonzalez Message-ID: Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 10:00:21 +0200 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20190429063242.blpen7vuuripsf56@localhost> Content-Language: en-US X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV using ClamSMTP ; ns.iliad.fr ; Mon Apr 29 10:00:21 2019 +0200 (CEST) X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20190429_010027_063018_6A5B3DD9 X-CRM114-Status: GOOD ( 13.51 ) X-BeenThere: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Mark Rutland , Catalin Marinas , arm-soc , Will Deacon , Linux ARM Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+infradead-linux-arm-kernel=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org On 29/04/2019 08:32, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 07:48:15PM +0200, Marc Gonzalez wrote: > >> On 18/04/2019 19:25, Olof Johansson wrote: >> >>> On Thu, Apr 18, 2019 at 6:53 AM Marc Gonzalez wrote: >>> >>>> As it stands, get_maintainer.pl scans the changelog to determine the >>>> recipients for arm64 defconfig patches: >>>> >>>> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> Catalin Marinas (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) >>>> Will Deacon (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) >>>> Heiko Stuebner (commit_signer:10/73=14%) >>>> Simon Horman (commit_signer:9/73=12%) >>>> Maxime Ripard (commit_signer:8/73=11%) >>>> Olof Johansson (commit_signer:8/73=11%,added_lines:39/248=16%,removed_lines:63/135=47%) >>>> Andy Gross (commit_signer:8/73=11%) >>>> Jagan Teki (authored:7/73=10%) >>>> Bjorn Andersson (authored:7/73=10%,added_lines:32/248=13%) >>>> Enric Balletbo i Serra (authored:5/73=7%,added_lines:29/248=12%) >>>> Stefan Wahren (authored:4/73=5%) >>>> Ezequiel Garcia (authored:4/73=5%) >>>> Marc Gonzalez (added_lines:53/248=21%,removed_lines:63/135=47%) >>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) >>>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) >>>> >>>> Explicitly list arch/arm64/configs/ in order to limit the recipients >>>> list to AArch64 maintainers, and protect the innocent: >>>> >>>> $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl arch/arm64/configs/defconfig >>>> Catalin Marinas (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) >>>> Will Deacon (maintainer:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) >>>> linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org (moderated list:ARM64 PORT (AARCH64 ARCHITECTURE)) >>>> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list) >>>> >>>> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez >>> >>> This is inaccurate, most defconfig updates come in through arm-soc >>> since most of them are platform related. >> >> What is inaccurate? My assessment of the situation? >> ("As it stands, get_maintainer.pl scans the changelog to determine >> the recipients for arm64 defconfig patches.") > > The list of maintainers is inaccurate. What list are we discussing? The output of scripts/get_maintainer.pl above? Of course it is inaccurate... that's the whole point. > In general, defconfig updates should go in through the respective platform > maintainers for platform-related changes. For architecture related changes, > it'll go through Catalin/Will). I hear you. However, *some* people do use scripts/get_maintainer.pl to send a defconfig tweak. >>> For core features, Will and Catalin are there right maintainers. For >>> platform options, they usually go to the platform maintainers and then >>> to us. >>> >>> So, if you're turning on a feature for an SoC, send it to said >>> SoC/platform maintainer. >> >> I want to stop receiving defconfig patches, just because I poked >> the file a few months ago. > > The way maintenance of the file is setup, there's no good way to write > a maintainer entry for it. None of us want these patches directly. > > We've dealt with this just fine for years on 32-bit ARM. > > Feel free to just delete these patches when you receive them. I don't use filters to delete email. I inspect every message I receive. (Therefore unsolicited email is an annoyance.) In what ways is v2 a problem for you? Do you want a copy of defconfig patches sent to arm@kernel.org ? Regards. _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel